2011 NCAA Division I men's soccer rankings

Throughout the 2011 NCAA Division I men's soccer season, several sources rank the top men's college soccer programs in the nation based on their results and perceived strength of their opponents. Notable ranking sources include the National Soccer Coaches Association of America, whose poll is the official rankings posted by the NCAA, as well as the Fox Soccer/SBI, Soccer America and TopDrawerSoccer.com polls.

Current rankings

NSCAA[1] TopDrawerSoccer.com[2] Fox Soccer/SBI[3] Soccer America[4] SoccerTimes.com[5] POV
1. New Mexico New Mexico Connecticut New Mexico New Mexico
2. Creighton North Carolina Maryland North Carolina Creighton
3. North Carolina Creighton New Mexico Maryland North Carolina
4. Maryland USF Creighton Connecticut Maryland
5. South Florida Connecticut Louisville Creighton South Florida
6. Akron Maryland St. John's Akron Connecticut
7. Connecticut Akron UCF USF Akron
8. UCLA Boston College Akron UCLA UCLA
9. Indiana Indiana South Florida Indiana Boston College
10. Boston College UCLA New Mexico Coastal Carolina Indiana
11. Charlotte Louisville Notre Dame Boston College Charlotte
12. James Madison Virginia UC Irvine James Madison Coastal Carolina
13. Coastal Carolina James Madison UC Santa Barbara UCF Louisville
14. UC Irvine Old Dominion UCLA Louisville UC Irvine
15. Louisville UC Irvine Indiana Charlotte James madison
16. Old Dominion UC Santa Barbara UC Santa Barbara UC Santa Barbara UC Santa Barbara
17. UC Santa Barbara Charlotte Georgetown Northwestern Central Florida
18. Notre Dame Furman James Madison UC Irvine Alabama at Birmingham
19. Furman West Virginia Cal State Bakersfield Notre Dame Notre Dame
20. Washington Ohio State Northern Illinois Washington West Virginia
21. UAB UCF Coastal Carolina UAB Old Dominion
22. UCF Georgetown Furman Furman st. John's
23. West Virginia Notre Dame UNC Charlotte Providence Washington
24. Iona UAB Xavier West Virginia Georgetown
25. Providence Memphis SMU Memphis Furman

National Rankings by week

Italics represent the ranking for non-ranked teams that received votes.

TeamWeek
P 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
New Mexico NR NR NR 16 11 9 6 6 5 2 1 1 1
Creighton 10 6 5 3 3 2 5 4 6 3 2 2 2
North Carolina 3 3 1 8 6 5 4 2 2 4 3 3 3
UCLA 6 13 NR NR 18 25 15 9 8 12 8 6 4
Connecticut 8 5 3 2 2 1 1 1 1 5 7 5 5
Maryland 4 4 2 1 1 3 2 3 3 1 4 4 6
UC Irvine 24 14 9 5 8 7 7 7 7 9 14 11 7
Boston College 25 16 8 11 10 13 16 14 18 13 10 13 8
Indiana 17 18 10 9 7 6 10 18 13 10 9 9 9
Akron 2 2 4 4 4 4 3 5 4 7 6 7 10
St. John's NR NR NR 14 12 15 9 21 12 18 NR 21 11
South Florida NR 20 11 17 21 16 17 11 9 6 5 10 12
UC Santa Barbara 14 9 6 6 13 10 19 13 16 23 17 15 13
Charlotte NR NR NR 19 14 12 14 15 10 16 11 8 15
Louisville 1 1 7 7 5 8 11 10 15 22 15 14 15
Northwestern NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 25 16
Coastal Carolina NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 20 17 13 12 17
Washington NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 23 20 20 19 18
SMU 5 17 NR NR NR NR NR NR 21 15 NR NR 19
UAB NR NR NR NR 24 NR NR NR NR NR 21 17 20
Old Dominion NR NR NR 21 15 20 21 17 11 8 16 18 21
Furman NR NR NR NR 25 24 NR NR NR 24 19 16 22
Monmouth NR 25 18 NR NR NR NR NR NR 25 NR NR 23
Bradley NR NR NR 18 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 22 24
Fairfield NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 25
Xavier NR NR NR NR NR NR 23 NR NR NR NR NR 25

Source: NCAA
P = Preseason rankings
NR = Not ranked

References

  1. "NCAA Division I Men's Soccer Rankings". National Soccer Coaches Association of America. NCAA.com. October 11, 2011. Retrieved October 13, 2011.
  2. "Men's College Rankings: Week 4". TopDrawerSoccer.com. Advanced Soccer Media, LLC. October 10, 2011. Retrieved October 13, 2011.
  3. Garlarcep, Ives (October 7, 2011). "UConn, Maryland dominate the top 25". MSN.FoxSports.com. Retrieved October 13, 2011.
  4. "Soccer America Men's Top 25". Soccer America. SoccerAmerica.com. September 6, 2011. Retrieved September 12, 2011.
  5. Davidson, Gary. "2011: Men's Top 25 Poll". SoccerTimes.com. Retrieved September 12, 2011.
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Friday, October 31, 2014. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.