2011 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Elena Kagan

The 2011 term of the Supreme Court of the United States began October 3, 2011 and concluded September 30, 2012. This was the second term of Associate Justice Elena Kagan's tenure on the Court.
Elena Kagan 2011 term statistics
7
Majority or Plurality
1
Concurrence
0
Other
1
Dissent
1
Concurrence/dissent Total = 10
Bench opinions = 10 Opinions relating to orders = 0 In-chambers opinions = 0
Unanimous opinions: 5 Most joined by: Ginsburg (8) Least joined by: Roberts, Thomas, Alito (6)
Type Case Citation Issues Joined by Other opinions
1-01



Judulang v. Holder  [full text] 565 U.S. ___ (2011)

deportation   discretionary relief   comparable-grounds rule   Administrative Procedure Act Unanimous
The Court ruled that the Board of Immigration Appeals' "comparable-grounds rule" was arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act. The rule was used by the agency to determine the eligibility for discretionary relief of a long-term resident alien facing deportation for a past criminal conviction. The comparable-grounds rule asked whether the statutory deportation ground corresponded, in type and breadth, to a statutory exclusion ground under which a long-term resident alien who left the U.S. could be barred from re-entry. "But so what if it does?", the Court asked. "Each of these statutory grounds contains a slew of offenses. Whether each contains the same slew has nothing to do with whether a deportable alien whose prior conviction falls within both grounds merits the ability to seek a waiver." Comparing the comparable-grounds rule to decisionmaking by coin toss, the Court wrote that the rule was "unmoored from the purposes and concerns of the immigration laws. It allows an irrelevant comparison between statutory provisions to govern a matter of the utmost importance—whether lawful resident aliens with longstanding ties to this country may stay here." The rule was made further arbitrary by the fact that an official's choice of which of overlapping statutory deportation grounds covered a particular prior crime would itself determine the outcome of the comparison.
1-02



National Meat Assn. v. Harris 565 U.S. ___ (2012)

Federal Meat Inspection Act   regulation of slaughterhouses   disposition of nonambulatory livestock   federal preemption Unanimous
3-03



Messerschmidt v. Millender 565 U.S. ___ (2012)

Fourth Amendment   law enforcement reliance on overbroad search warrant   qualified immunity
Roberts
Breyer
Sotomayor
2-04



Kurns v. Railroad Friction Products Corp. 565 U.S. ___ (2012)

Locomotive Inspection Act   injury from asbestos exposure   state law claims for defective design and failure to warn   federal preemption
Thomas
Sotomayor
1-05



Martel v. Claire 565 U.S. ___ (2012)

habeas corpus   motion to substitute counsel in capital case   Unanimous
1-06



Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd. v. Novo Nordisk A/S 566 U.S. ___ (2012)

pharmaceutical patents   counterclaim by generic drug companies to force correction of patent-holder use code Unanimous
Sotomayor
1-07



Holder v. Martinez Gutierrez 566 U.S. ___ (2012)

cancellation of removal of alien   imputation to child of parent's continuous residence or lawful permanent residence status Unanimous
4-08



Williams v. Illinois 567 U.S. ___ (2012)

Sixth Amendment   Confrontation Clause   expert testimony Scalia, Ginsburg, Sotomayor
Alito
Thomas
Breyer
1-09



Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians v. Patchak 567 U.S. ___ (2012)

Indian Reorganization Act   government acquisition of property to provide to Native Americans   sovereign immunity   Quiet Title Act   prudential standing Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito
Sotomayor
1-10



Miller v. Alabama 567 U.S. ___ (2012)

Eighth Amendment   Cruel and Unusual Punishment   sentencing of juveniles to life without parole Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor
Breyer
Roberts
Thomas
Alito

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Sunday, April 26, 2015. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.