Aircraft classification number

The aircraft classification number (ACN) is a number expressing the relative effect of an aircraft on the runway pavement for a specified standard subgrade category, using a method defined by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO).

The ACN is a single unique number expressing the relative effect of an aircraft on a pavement for a specified subgrade strength specifying a particular pavement thickness. It consists of a number on a continuous scale, ranging from 0 on the lower end and with no upper limit, that is computed between two pavement types (rigid or flexible), and the subgrade support strength category. ACN values for civil aircraft have been published in ICAO’s Aerodrome Design Manual and in FAA Circular 150/5335-5.

Using the ACN method, it is possible to express the effect of individual aircraft on different pavements by a single unique number, which varies according to pavement type and subgrade strength, without specifying a particular pavement thickness.

The ACN is twice the derived single-wheel load expressed in thousands of kilograms, with single-wheel tire pressure standardized at 1.25 megapascals (= 181 psi). Additionally, the derived single-wheel load is a function of the sub-grade strength.

The ACN of an airplane is a function of not only its weight but also the design parameters of its landing gear such as the distances between the wheels of a multiple-wheel landing gear assembly.

The pavement’s strength is denoted by its pavement classification number (PCN).

The load exerted on a pavement by the landing gear of an airplane is denoted as its ACN, or airplane classification number. The ACN is not permitted to exceed the PCN of the runway to be used, in order to prolong pavement life and prevent possible pavement damage.

The ACN is defined for only four subgrade categories (high, medium, low, and ultra low).

The ACN-PCN method

The ACN-PCN system of rating airport pavements is designated by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) as the only approved method for reporting strength.

“The bearing strength of a pavement intended for aircraft of apron (ramp) mass greater than 5700 kg shall be made available using the aircraft classification number – pavement classification number ACN-PCN method………” (ICAO Annex 14, clause 2.6.2)

The ICAO system for civil airport pavements involves comparison of an airport’s pavement classification number (PCN) with an aircraft classification number (ACN). According to this worldwide ICAO standard, aircraft can safely operate on a pavement if their ACN is less than or equal to the pavement load bearing capacity or PCN. An aircraft having an ACN equal to or less than the PCN can operate without weight restrictions on a pavement. The PCN is formally published in an Aeronautical Information Publication (AIP).

States are required to evaluate and publish the strength of airport pavements using ICAOs ACN-PCN system. The method concentrates on classifying the relative damage of aircraft. ICAO foresees that each pavement authority will define a PCN by whatever means is considered suitable to indicate the support level of a particular pavement such that all aircraft with a published ACN equal to or less than the reported PCN can use that pavement safely, without load bearing failure or undue damage to the structure.

The ACN-PCN system provides a standardised international airplane/pavement rating system replacing the various S, T, TT, LCN, AUW, ISWL, etc., rating systems throughout the world. In 1981 ICAO promulgated the ACN-PCN method as the single universal system for determining the weight limitation of aircraft operating on airport pavements by a procedure of comparing an airport’s PCN with an ACN. To avoid accelerated deterioration and excessive maintenance costs and for the safeguarding of pavement integrity and assurance of optimum service life ICAO utilises the ACN /PCN load classification method for reporting pavement strength. According to this world-wide standard, aircraft can safely operate on a pavement if their ACN is less than or equal to the pavement load bearing capacity or PCN. An aircraft having an ACN equal to or less than the PCN can operate without weight restrictions on a pavement.

The ACN-PCN method is not a design or evaluation method, but purely a classification system. Unfortunately the fact that the method of calculating ACN utilises two common design and analysis methods (the CBR equation and Westergaard theories) has led a surprisingly large number of people to assume that it is a design and evaluation method. It is not uncommon for reference to be made to PCN’s calculated by the ACN-PCN method. In fact the ICAO documentation makes it very clear that it is not a design/evaluation method and that the PCN is simply the ACN of the most damaging aircraft that can use the pavement on a regular basis (regular being defined by the operator).

The ACN-PCN method only deals with aircraft weighting in excess of 5,700 kg (12,566 lb) as the airports with pavement for smaller size aircraft need only report the maximum allowable mass and the maximum allowable tire pressure if applicable.

The ACN/PCN system ensures that both aircraft and pavement can be utilised to their maximum extent without detrimental effects. According to the Design Manual the method is meant only for publication of pavement strength data in the Aeronautical Information Publication (AIPs). It is not intended for design or evaluation of pavements, nor does it contemplate the use of a specific method by the airport authority either for the design or evaluation of pavements. Although the Design Manual states that any method may be used to determine the load rating of the pavements, it is obvious that the use of layered elastic method in conjunction with calibrated failure criteria is preferred

ACN reporting

ACN values for selected aircraft have been calculated by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) using two computer programs, one for rigid pavements and the other for flexible pavements.

Manufacturers are required to calculate ACNs for new aircraft as they come into service and publish the results in flight manuals. The tables give ACN values for two weights, one at the maximum total weight authorized and the other at the operating weight when empty. If an aircraft is operating at an intermediate weight, the ACN value can be calculated by a linear variation between the limits. Extrapolation is not permissible. ACN is calculated with respect to the center of gravity position, which yields the critical loading on the critical gear. Normally, the aftmost center of gravity, or CG position, appropriate to the maximum gross apron (ramp) mass, or ramp weight, is used to calculate the ACN. In exceptional cases, the forwardmost CG position may make the nose-landing gear loading more critical.

The ICAO "Aerodrome Design Manual – Part 3 – Appendix 2" contains computer programs (source code) for the calculation of ICAO ACN's for aircraft operation on both rigid and flexible pavements. The ICAO ACN Fortran source code has been rewritten and recompiled by Transport Canada into two (2) executable stand-alone programs. The original input/output formats of the ICAO ACN programs were followed as closely as possible. The internal program calculations and equations of the ICAO programs were also followed and incorporated in the new .exe files. The result is the computation of aircraft ACN values that are fully compatible with the ICAO ACN/PCN strength reporting system for airfield pavements. The programs are available at http://www.tc.gc.ca/CivilAviation/.../software.htm

The FAA also has a large amount of guidance material available on their website. Advisory Circular AC 150/5335-5B provides further guidance on ACN and PCN calculations and the relationship between the two numbers. The FAA also provides a more user friendly version of the ICAO computer programs, although that code has been translated from the original Fortran language to Visual Basic. The FAA software is COMFAA and is available from their software download page at: http://www.airporttech.tc.faa.gov/naptf/download/index1.asp#soft

Subgrade support strength category

The ranges of subgrade strength covered by these standard subgrade categories (designated as A, B, C and D) are shown below.

Flexible pavements

The flexible pavements have four subgrade categories:

Rigid pavements

The rigid pavements have four subgrade categories:

Updates

As per October 2007, ICAO revised the alpha factor for four wheel undercarriages. Based on recent findings of full scale pavement tests, ICAO agreed to the following revisions concerning the alpha factor values: a. change the alpha factor value for all four-wheels per main landing gear from the current 0.825 to 0.80; b. retain the alpha factor for six-wheels per main landing gear at 0.72; and c. change the alpha factors for other main landing gears so that the ranking of the damaging effect remains consistent.

Aircraft ACN list

Aircraft Classification Numbers (ACNs)
Aircraft Weight
Maximum
(kN)		 Tire
Pressure
(MPa)		 Flexible pavement sub-grades
CBR%		 Rigid pavement sub-grades
k (MPa/m3)
High Medium Low Very low High Medium Low Ultra low
A B C D A B C D
15 10 6 3 150 80 40 20
A330-200 (Configuration 1) 2,137 1.34 57 62 72 98 48 56 66 78
A330-200 (Configuration 2) 2,264 1.42 62 67 78 106 53 61 73 85
A330-300 (Configuration 1) 2,088 1.31 55 60 70 94 46 54 64 75
A330-300 (Configuration 2) 2,137 1.33 57 61 71 96 47 55 65 77
A330-300 (Configuration 3) 2,264 1.42 62 68 79 107 54 62 74 86
A380-800 (6 Wheel Main Gear) 5,514 1.47 56 62 75 106 55 67 88 110
A380-800 (4 Wheel Wing Gear) 5,514 1.47 62 68 80 108 55 64 76 88
B737-800 777 1.47 44 46 51 56 51 53 55 57
B737-900 777 1.47 44 46 51 56 51 53 55 57
B737-BBJ 763 1.47 43 45 50 55 50 52 54 56
B747-400, 400F, 400M 3,905 1.38 53 59 73 94 53 62 74 85
B747-400D (Domestic) 2,729 1.04 36 39 47 65 30 36 43 51
B747-400ER 4,061 1.58 57 63 78 100 59 69 81 92
B747-SP 3,127 1.26 45 50 61 81 40 48 58 67
B777-300 2,945 1.48 53 59 72 100 54 68 88 108
B777-300ER 3,345 1.52 64 71 89 120 66 85 109 131
B787-8 2,240 1.57 60 66 81 106 61 71 84 96
BAC-111 Series 400 390 0.97 23 24 27 29 25 27 28 29
BAC-111 Series 475 440 0.57 23 28 29 32 26 28 29 31
BAC-111 Series 500 467 1.1 29 31 33 35 33 34 35 36
BAe-146-100 376 0.84 18 20 23 26 20 22 24 25
BAe-146-200 416 0.97 22 23 26 29 24 26 27 29
BAe-146-300 436 1.1 24 25 28 31 27 28 30 31
Bae-ATP 232 0.85 12 13 14 16 13 14 15 16
Beech 1900C, 1900D 76 0.67 3 4 4 5 4 4 5 5
Beech 2000 Starship 65 0.54 2 3 4 4 3 4 4 4
Beech Jet 400, 400A 73 0.86 6 7 7 7 6 6 6 6
Beech King Air 100, 200 Series 56 0.73 2 3 3 4 3 3 3 4
Beech King Air 300, 300C, 350, 350C 67 0.73 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4
Bombardier 415 (Canadair CL-215, 415) 196 0.53 12 14 17 17 14 14 15 15
Bombardier BD-700, Global Express, XRS 437 1.15 26 28 31 32 30 31 32 33
Bombardier Challenger 300 168 1.21 9 9 11 12 11 11 12 12
Bombardier Challenger 800 237 1.12 13 14 16 17 16 16 17 18
Bombardier Challenger CL 600, 601, 604 215 1.21 12 13 15 16 15 15 16 16
Bombardier CRJ100, CRJ200, CRJ440 237 1.12 13 14 16 17 16 16 17 18
Bombardier CRJ700 Series 335 1.06 18 18 21 24 20 21 22 23
Bombardier CRJ900 Series 377 1.06 21 21 24 27 23 24 26 27
Bombardier Dash 8 Q100, Q200 Series 162 0.9 8 8 9 11 9 9 10 10
Bombardier Dash 8 Q300 Series 192 0.67 8 9 11 13 10 11 11 12
Bombardier Dash 8 Q400 287 0.67 14 16 18 20 16 17 18 19
Bombardier Global 391 1.15 23 24 27 29 26 27 28 29
C-123K Provider (Fairchild/Republic) 267 0.69 20 22 24 25 21 21 22 22
C-141B Starlifter (Lockheed) 1,553 1.31 52 60 73 88 51 61 70 78
C-17A (Globemaster III) 2,736 0.95 46 51 61 80 55 51 61 76
C-5 Galaxy (Lockheed) 3,723 0.77 31 33 40 51 28 31 37 45
Cessna 501 (Citation I – Eagle) 56 0.69 4 5 5 5 4 5 5 5
Cessna 550 (Citation II) 64 0.69 5 5 6 6 5 5 5 5
Cessna 550 (Citation Bravo) 67 0.69 5 6 6 6 5 5 6 6
Cessna 560 (Citation V, Ultra, Encore) 75 0.69 6 6 7 7 6 6 6 6
Cessna 560 XL (Citation Excel) 90 1.48 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
Cessna 650 (Citation III, VI) 99 1.02 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 7
Cessna 650 (Citation VII) 104 1.16 6 7 7 8 7 8 8 8
Cessna 750 (Citation X) 160 1.16 10 11 12 12 12 12 13 13
CF-18 249 1.38 21 20 20 20 21 21 21 21
Convair 240 190 0.64 7 9 10 12 9 10 10 11
Convair 340, 440, 540 222 0.47 7 9 11 14 9 10 11 12
Convair 580 259 0.59 10 12 14 17 12 13 14 15
Convair 5800 280 0.59 11 13 15 19 13 14 16 17
Convair 600 210 0.73 9 10 11 14 10 11 12 13
Convair 640 245 0.52 8 11 12 15 10 12 13 14
Convair 880 860 1.03 27 31 36 44 26 31 36 40
Convair 990 1,135 1.28 40 46 53 64 40 47 54 60
Dassault Falcon 164 1.36 9 10 11 12 11 12 12 13
Dassault Falcon 2000EX 189 1.51 11 12 13 14 14 14 15 15
Dassault Falcon 10 84 0.93 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 6
Dassault Falcon 20 128 0.92 8 9 9 10 10 10 10 10
Dassault Falcon 50 173 0.93 9 10 12 13 11 12 12 13
Dassault Falcon 900 202 1.3 11 12 14 15 14 14 15 15
DC-10-10, 10CF, 15 2,037 1.34 57 62 74 101 49 58 69 80
DC-10-20, 20CF, 30CF, 40CF 2,485 1.14 60 67 81 110 49 59 72 85
DC-10-30, 30ER, 40 2,593 1.22 59 65 79 107 50 59 72 84
DC-3 147 0.31 5 7 10 12 8 8 9 9
DC-4 335 0.53 12 15 17 21 14 16 17 19
DC-6, 6B 480 0.73 20 23 25 30 22 24 26 27
DC-7 (All Models) 640 0.89 34 36 42 46 37 40 42 44
DC-8-10, 20 Series 1,226 1.01 36 41 49 62 32 39 46 53
DC-8-43, 55, 61, 71 1,470 1.3 47 54 64 79 45 54 63 71
DC-8-61F, 63F 1,557 1.32 51 59 69 85 50 59 68 76
DC-8-62, 62F, 63, 72, 73 1,593 1.35 52 59 70 87 50 59 69 77
DC-9-10, 15 404 0.93 22 23 26 29 24 26 27 28
DC-9-21 445 1.02 25 26 30 32 28 29 31 32
DC-9-30, 32 485 1.05 27 29 33 35 30 32 34 35
DC-9-41, 50, 51 543 1.17 31 33 37 40 35 37 39 40
DHC4 Caribou 130 0.28 2 3 5 7 4 4 5 6
DHC5 Buffalo 187 0.41 6 8 10 12 8 9 10 11
DHC6 Twin Otter Series 300 56 0.26 2 2 3 5 3 3 3 4
DHC7 Dash 7 209 0.74 10 12 13 15 12 13 14 14
DHS-2 Conair Firecat 116 0.62 8 10 10 11 9 9 9 10
Dornier 228 Series 63 0.9 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
Dornier 328 Jet 155 1.13 8 8 10 11 10 10 10 11
Dornier 328-110 (Turboprop) 138 0.8 7 7 8 10 8 8 9 9
Dornier SA227 (Metro, Merlin, Expediter) 74 0.73 3 4 4 5 4 5 5 5
Douglas A-26 Invader 120 0.48 7 8 10 11 8 8 9 9
Douglas B-26 Invader 156 0.48 9 11 13 14 10 11 11 12
Embraer 170, 175 368 1.04 20 21 24 26 22 24 25 26
Embraer 190, 195 481 1.1 28 30 33 35 31 33 35 36
Embraer EMB-110 (Bandeirante) 59 0.62 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Embraer EMB-120 (Brasilia) Series 119 0.76 5 6 7 8 7 7 7 8
Embraer ERJ-145 Series 237 0.9 14 15 16 17 16 16 17 18
Fokker 100 452 0.94 25 27 31 33 28 30 31 33
Fokker 50 205 0.59 9 11 13 14 11 12 13 13
Fokker 60 226 0.62 10 13 14 16 13 14 14 15
Fokker 70 410 0.81 21 24 27 30 24 26 27 29
Fokker F27 Friendship 205 0.57 9 11 13 14 11 12 13 13
Fokker F28 Fellowship 325 0.53 14 17 20 23 16 18 20 21
Gulfstream G100 (IAI-1125-Astra SPX) 111 0.86 6 6 7 8 7 7 7 8
Gulfstream G159 156 0.83 8 8 10 11 9 10 10 11
Gulfstream G200 (IAI-1126-Galaxy) 159 0.86 9 10 11 12 10 11 11 12
Gulfstream II 294 1.04 17 18 20 22 20 21 21 22
Gulfstream III 312 1.21 19 20 22 23 22 23 23 24
Gulfstream IV 334 1.21 20 22 24 25 24 25 25 26
Gulfstream V 405 1.37 26 28 30 31 31 32 32 33
Hawker 1000 (BAe 1000A) 138 0.83 8 8 9 10 9 9 10 10
Hawker 400XP (Beech Jet 400A) 73 0.86 6 7 7 7 6 6 6 6
Hawker 800, 800XP (HS-125-800, 800XP) 125 0.83 7 7 8 9 8 8 9 9
Hercules C-130, 082, 182, 282, 382 778 0.67 29 34 37 43 33 36 39 42
Hercules L-100 (Commercial) 693 0.74 27 30 33 38 30 33 35 38
HS/BAe 125 (All Series to 600) 112 0.83 6 6 7 8 7 7 8 8
HS/BAe 700 114 0.88 6 7 7 8 7 8 8 8
HS/BAe 748 227 0.51 9 11 14 16 11 12 13 14
Ilyushin IL-18 625 0.8 16 17 21 29 13 16 20 23
Ilyushin IL-62, 62M 1,648 1.65 52 58 68 83 51 59 68 77
Ilyushin IL-76T 1,677 0.64 24 27 34 45 29 33 30 34
Ilyushin IL-76TD 1,775 0.66 27 30 37 49 32 35 32 37
Ilyushin IL-86 2,054 0.88 34 36 43 61 26 31 38 46
Jetstream 31, 32 (BAe) 69 0.39 3 4 5 6 4 5 5 5
Jetstream 41 (BAe) 107 0.83 5 5 6 7 6 6 7 7
KC-10 (McDonnell Douglas) 2,593 1.22 59 65 79 107 50 59 72 84
KC-135 Stratotanker (Boeing) 1,342 1.38 38 41 49 64 35 40 48 55
L-1011-1 Tristar 1,913 1.35 52 56 66 90 45 52 62 72
L-1011-100, 200 Tristar 2,073 1.35 57 63 75 101 49 58 69 81
L-1011-250 Tristar 2,269 1.35 64 71 86 114 55 66 79 91
L-1011-500 Tristar 2,295 1.35 65 72 87 116 56 67 80 93
Learjet 24F (Bombardier) 62 0.79 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4
Learjet 25D, 25F (Bombardier) 69 0.79 3 4 4 5 4 5 5 5
Learjet 25G (Bombardier) 75 0.79 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5
Learjet 28, 29 (Long-horn) (Bombardier) 69 0.79 3 4 4 5 4 5 5 5
Learjet 31A, 35A, 36A (Bombardier) 83 0.79 4 5 5 6 5 5 6 6
Learjet 40, 45, 45XR (Bombardier) 98 0.79 5 6 7 7 6 7 7 7
Learjet 55B, 55C (Bombardier) 97 1.24 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 7
Learjet 60 (Bombardier) 106 1.48 6 7 7 8 8 8 8 8
Lockheed 188 Electra 503 0.95 27 29 33 36 30 32 34 36
MD-11 2,805 1.38 67 74 90 119 58 69 83 96
MD-81 628 1.14 36 38 43 46 41 43 45 46
MD-82 670 1.14 39 41 46 49 43 46 48 50
MD-83 716 1.14 42 45 50 53 47 50 52 54
MD-87 628 1.14 36 38 43 46 41 43 45 46
MD-88 670 1.14 39 41 46 50 44 46 48 50
MD-90-30 699 1.14 41 43 48 52 46 48 50 52
MD-90-30ER 739 1.14 44 47 52 55 49 51 54 56
MD-90-50, 55 772 1.14 46 50 54 57 52 54 57 58
P-3A/B/C Orion 623 1.31 38 41 44 47 44 46 48 49
Saab 2000 226 0.69 11 13 14 16 13 14 15 15
Saab 340 A, B 131 0.82 6 7 8 9 7 8 8 9
Sepecat Jaguar (Configuration 1) 154 0.58 7 9 10 11 9 10 10 11
Sepecat Jaguar (Configuration 2) 108 0.58 4 6 6 7 6 6 7 7
Shorts 330 102 0.55 6 8 9 9 7 8 8 8
Shorts 360 121 0.54 7 9 10 11 9 9 9 9
Shorts Sherpa 114 0.54 7 8 10 10 8 8 9 9
Shorts Skyvan 67 0.28 2 3 4 6 4 4 4 4
Swearingen SJ30-2 60 1.07 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4
Transall C-160 500 0.38 8 10 13 18 10 10 10 13
Tupolev TU-134 463 0.59 10 12 15 20 9 11 14 16
Tupolev TU-154 961 0.93 19 22 28 37 18 24 30 36
Tupolev TU-204, 214, 224, 234 1,096 1.38 31 33 40 53 29 34 40 46
VC10 Series 1,590 1.01 48 54 66 83 41 50 60 69
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Friday, October 17, 2014. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.