Anderson's Pty Ltd v Victoria
| Anderson's Pty Ltd v Victoria | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Court | High Court of Australia |
| Full case name | Anderson's Pty Ltd v Victoria |
| Decided | 17 December 1964 |
| Citation(s) | (1964) 111 CLR 353 |
| Case history | |
| Prior action(s) | none |
| Subsequent action(s) | none |
| Court membership | |
| Judge(s) sitting | Barwick CJ, McTiernan, Kitto, Taylor, Menzies and Windeyer JJ |
Anderson's Pty Ltd v Victoria (1964) 111 CLR 353 is a High Court of Australia case that dealt with section 90 of the Australian Constitution. In this case, following on from such cases as Dennis Hotels Pty Ltd v Victoria, Barwick CJ accepted the broad approach to the definition of an excise, but rejected the formalistic criterion of liability approach for determining if the excise falls at the relevant step. He adopted the substance over form approach, or the substantial effects doctrine, in that there are many factors to be considered, for example, the indirectness of the tax, its effect on the cost of goods and its proximity to the production or distribution of the goods.
See also
References
- Winterton, G. et al. Australian federal constitutional law: commentary and materials, 1999. LBC Information Services, Sydney.
External links
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Wednesday, November 04, 2015. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.