Anderson's Pty Ltd v Victoria

Anderson's Pty Ltd v Victoria
Court High Court of Australia
Full case name Anderson's Pty Ltd v Victoria
Decided 17 December 1964
Citation(s) (1964) 111 CLR 353
Case history
Prior action(s) none
Subsequent action(s) none
Court membership
Judge(s) sitting Barwick CJ, McTiernan, Kitto, Taylor, Menzies and Windeyer JJ

Anderson's Pty Ltd v Victoria (1964) 111 CLR 353 is a High Court of Australia case that dealt with section 90 of the Australian Constitution. In this case, following on from such cases as Dennis Hotels Pty Ltd v Victoria, Barwick CJ accepted the broad approach to the definition of an excise, but rejected the formalistic criterion of liability approach for determining if the excise falls at the relevant step. He adopted the substance over form approach, or the substantial effects doctrine, in that there are many factors to be considered, for example, the indirectness of the tax, its effect on the cost of goods and its proximity to the production or distribution of the goods.

See also

References

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Wednesday, November 04, 2015. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.