Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc.
Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc. | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Argued March 18, 2013 Decided June 17, 2013 | |||||||
Full case name | ' | ||||||
Docket nos. | 12-71 | ||||||
Citations | |||||||
Holding | |||||||
Arizona’s evidence-of-citizenship requirement, as applied to Federal Form applicants, is pre-empted by the National Voter Registration Act's mandate that States “accept and use” the Federal Form. | |||||||
Court membership | |||||||
| |||||||
Case opinions | |||||||
Majority | Scalia, joined by Roberts, Ginsburg, Kagan, Breyer, and Sotomayor; and Kennedy (in part) | ||||||
Concurrence | Kennedy (in part and in judgement) | ||||||
Dissent | Thomas | ||||||
Dissent | Alito | ||||||
Laws applied | |||||||
National Voter Registration Act & Elections Clause |
Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc., 570 U.S. __ (2013), is a 2012-term Supreme Court Case revolving around Arizona's unique voter registration requirements, which include the necessity of documenting citizenship. The Court, led by Justice Scalia, held that these requirements were pre-empted by the federal National Voter Registration Act. However, the Court did suggest ways for Arizona to overcome this hurdle.[1]
See also
References
- ↑ Marty Lederman (June 17, 2013). "Pyrrhic victory for federal government in Arizona voter registration case?". SCOTUSBlog. Retrieved July 6, 2013.
External links
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Tuesday, March 01, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.