Aryana Institute for Regional Research and Advocacy

Aryana Institute for Regional Research and Advocacy is a think tank of researchers and activists from Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) and Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa province of Pakistan.[1] It conducts research, does surveys and collects statistics on issues concerning Taliban and Al-Qaeda activities in the region.[1] Based in Islamabad its work has been widely quoted by national and International news media.[2][3][4]

Activities

Its researchers go deep into FATA into areas not accessible to other journalists. Between November 2008 and January 2009 it conducted a survey of the public opinion about the drone strikes in Federally Administered Tribal Areas. 5 teams of 5 researchers each interviewed a total of 550 people from all walks of life.[2] Based on the responses the researchers concluded ' The popular notion outside the Pashtun belt that a large majority of the local population supports the Taliban movement lacks substance'. According to the research, most people also thought that the drone attacks were accurate and did not lead to anti American sentiment and were effective in damaging the militants. In addition the locals wanted the Pakistani forces to also target the militants.[1]

Khadim Hussain a member of the institute criticized the attempt of Pakistani government to impose Islamic law in Malakand District and called it a surrender to the militants.[3] In December 2009 he was quoted as saying that the entire FATA was controlled by Haqqani network and any efforts against Taliban that excluded them would be ineffective.[4]

In an analysis published in Daily Times on January 2, 2010 author Farhat Taj, a member of the Institute challenged the view that the local people of Waziristan were against the drone attacks. Author states on the basis of personal interviews with people in Waziristan that the locals in Waziristan support the attacks and see the drones as their 'liberators' from the clutches of Taliban and Pakistan's Intelligence agencies. She further challenged the government of Pakistan to provide accurate figures about the 'civilian' casualties and tell what methodology was used to collect this data. According to her 'The people of Waziristan are suffering a brutal kind of occupation under the Taliban and al Qaeda. It is in this context that they would welcome anyone, Americans, Israelis, Indians or even the devil, to rid them of the Taliban and al Qaeda.'[5]

In response to this analysis Irfan Husain writing in Dawn agreed with her assessment and called for more drone attacks. He wrote 'We need to wake up to the reality that the enemy has grown very strong in the years we temporized and tried to do deals with them. Clearly, we need allies in this fight. Howling at the moon is not going to get us the cooperation we so desperately need. A solid case can be made for more drone attacks, not less.[6]

See also

References

  1. 1 2 3 Drone attacks -- a survey, The News International, 2009-03-05
  2. 1 2 C.I.A. to Expand Use of Drones in Pakistan, The New York Times, 2009-12-03
  3. 1 2 Pakistan imposes Islamic law in Taliban stronghold, The Guardian, 2009-02-15
  4. 1 2 Will Pakistan military go after Taliban in North Waziristan?, The Christian Science Monitor, 2009-12-16
  5. ↑ analysis: Drone attacks: challenging some fabrications —Farhat Taj, Daily Times (Pakistan), 2010-01-02
  6. ↑ Howling at the moon, Dawn (newspaper), 2010-01-09

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Saturday, May 26, 2012. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.