No Fly List

The No Fly List is a list, created and maintained by the United States government's Terrorist Screening Center (TSC), of people who are prohibited from boarding a commercial aircraft for travel in or out of the United States. The list has also been used to divert aircraft, not flying to or from the U.S, away from U.S. airspace. The number of people on the list rises and falls according to threat and intelligence reporting. There were 10,000 names on the list in 2011, 21,000 in 2012, and 47,000 in 2013.

The list—along with the Secondary Security Screening Selection, which tags would-be passengers for extra inspection—was created after the September 11 attacks in 2001. The No Fly List, the Selectee List and the Terrorist Watchlist were created by the administration of George W. Bush and retained by the administration of Barack Obama. U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) said in May 2010: "The no-fly list itself is one of our best lines of defense."[1] However, the list has been criticized on civil liberties and due process grounds, due in part to the potential for ethnic, religious, economic, political, or racial profiling and discrimination. It has also raised concerns about privacy and government secrecy. Finally, it has been criticized as costly, prone to false positives, and easily defeated.

The No Fly List is different from the Terrorist Watch List, a much longer list of people said to be suspected of some involvement with terrorism. The Terrorist Watch List contained around 1,000,000 names by March 2009.

History

Before the attacks of September 11, 2001, the U.S. federal government had a list of 16 people deemed "no transport" because they "presented a specific known or suspected threat to aviation."[2][3] The list grew in the immediate aftermath of the September 11 attacks, reaching more than 400 names by November 2001, when responsibility for keeping it was transferred to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).[3] In mid-December 2001, two lists were created: the "No Fly List" of 594 people to be denied air transport, and the "Selectee" list of 365 people who were to be more carefully searched at airports.[2][3] By 2002, the two lists combined contained over a thousand names, and by April 2005 contained about 70,000 names.[2] For the first two and a half years of the program, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and Transportation Security Administration (TSA) denied that the program existed.[2]

The No Fly List program came to public light "when prominent antiwar activists, such as Jan Adams and Rebecca Gordan, and political opponents of the Bush administration, such as Senator Edward Kennedy and the civil rights attorney David Cole, found themselves included."[2] In October 2006, CBS News's 60 Minutes reported on the program after it obtained a March 2006 copy of the list containing 44,000 names.[4]

Many individuals were "caught in the system" as a result of sharing the exact or similar name of another person on the list;[5] TSA officials said that, as of November 2005, 30,000 people in 2005 had complained that their names were matched to a name on the list via the name matching software used by airlines.[6] In January 2006, the FBI and ACLU settled a federal lawsuit, Gordon v. FBI, brought by Gordon and Adams under the Freedom of Information Act in order to obtain information about how names were added to the list.[6] Under the settlement, the government paid $200,000 in the plaintiffs' attorneys' fees.[7] A separate suit was brought as a class action "filed by people caught in the name game."[5] In response, "TSA created an ombudsperson process, whereby individuals now can download and print out a Passenger Identity Verification Form and mail it, along with certain notarized documents, to the TSA "so the agency can differentiate the individual from others who may be on the list."[5]

In April 2007, the United States government "terrorist watch list" administered by the Terrorist Screening Center, which is managed principally by the FBI,[8] contained 700,000 records.[9] A year later, the ACLU estimated the list to have grown to over 1,000,000 names and to be continually expanding.[10][11][12] However, according to Homeland Security secretary Michael Chertoff, in October 2008 the No Fly list contained only 2,500 names, with an additional 16,000 "selectees" who "represent a less specific security threat and receive extra scrutiny, but are allowed to fly."[13]

As of 2011, the list contained about 10,000 names.[14][15] In 2012, the list more than doubled in size, to about 21,000 names.[16] In August 2013, a leak revealed that more than 47,000 people were on the list.[17][18]

Weapons purchases by listed persons

In a 2010 report, the Government Accountability Office noted that "Membership in a terrorist organization does not prohibit a person from possessing firearms or explosives under current federal law," and individuals on the No Fly List are not barred from purchasing guns.[19] According to GAO data, between 2004 and 2010, people on terrorism watch lists—including the No Fly List as well as other separate lists—attempted to buy guns and explosives more than 1,400 times, and succeeded in 1,321 times (more than 90 percent of cases).[20]

Senator Frank Lautenberg of New Jersey, a Democrat, repeatedly introduced legislation to bar individuals on the terror watch lists (such as the No Fly List) from buying firearms or explosives, but these efforts did not succeed.[19][20][21] Dianne Feinstein of California, also a Democrat, revived the legislation after the November 2015 Paris attacks, and President Barack Obama has called for such legislation to be approved.[19] Republicans in Congress, such as Senate Homeland Security Committee chairman Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, and Speaker of the House Paul Ryan, oppose this measure, citing due process concerns and efficacy, respectively.[19] Republicans have blocked attempts by Democrats to attach these provisions to Republican-backed measures.[22]

Vulnerabilities

False positives

A "false positive" occurs when a passenger who is not on the No Fly List has a name that matches or is similar to a name on the list. False positive passengers will not be allowed to board a flight unless they can differentiate themselves from the actual person on the list, usually by presenting ID showing their middle name or date of birth. In some cases, false positive passengers have been denied boarding or have missed flights because they could not easily prove that they were not the person on the No Fly List.

When an airline ticket is purchased, the reservation system uses software to compare the passenger's name against the No Fly List. If the name matches, or is similar to a name on the No Fly List, a restriction is placed in the reservation that prevents the passenger from being issued a boarding pass until the airline has determined whether or not he or she is the actual person whose name is on the No Fly List. Passengers are not told when a restriction has been placed on their reservation, and they normally do not find out that anything is unusual until they attempt to check in. "False positive" passengers cannot use Internet check-in or the automatic check-in kiosks in airports. Any attempt to use either check-in method will normally result in a message that the check-in cannot be completed and that the passenger needs to see a live check-in agent.

In order to be issued a boarding pass, "false positive" passengers must present identification that sufficiently differentiates them from the person on the No Fly List. This can include, but is not limited to, date and place of birth, middle name, citizenship, passport number, etc. Depending on the airline, this clearance can be done either electronically, with the check-in agent keying the information into the system, or a manual procedure where the agent telephones a centralized security office to obtain clearance. Once a "false positive" passenger has been cleared for a flight, the clearance will usually, but not always, apply to the remaining flights on that reservation, including the return. However, the next time this passenger purchases an airline ticket, he or she will have to be cleared all over again. If a passenger's identification is insufficient to differentiate that passenger from a name on the No-Fly List, the airline will refuse to issue a boarding pass and tell the passenger to contact the TSA.

Policies vary from airline to airline as to whether a check-in agent will tell passengers why they must always have additional steps performed when they check in, or why they are unable to check in via Internet, kiosk, or at curbside. In some cases, check-in agents will incorrectly tell passengers that they must be cleared because they are "on the No Fly List", when in fact they are simply a "false positive" (having the same name as someone on the No Fly List). False positive passengers who are ultimately issued boarding passes are not on the No Fly List. In the majority of instances, passengers are not told anything, and it is only through the repeated experience of needing to be cleared or being unable to use curbside, Internet or automatic check-in that they come to suspect that they are "false positives".

In an effort to reduce the number of false positives, DHS announced on April 28, 2008 that each airline will be permitted to create a system to verify and store a passenger's date of birth, to clear up watch list misidentifications. Passengers can voluntarily provide this information to the airline, which would have to be verified by presenting acceptable ID at the ticket counter. Once this data has been stored, travelers that were previously inconvenienced on every trip would be able to check in online or at remote kiosks.[23] It will be up to each individual airline to choose whether they wish to implement such a system.

Notable cases

False positives and abuses that have been in the news include:

DHS Traveler Redress Inquiry Program

The DHS Traveler Redress Inquiry Program (TRIP) is a procedure for travelers who are delayed or denied boarding of an aircraft, consistently receive excess scrutiny at security checkpoints, or are denied entry to the U.S. because they are believed to be or are told that they are on a government watch list. The traveler must complete an online application at the Department of Homeland Security website, print and sign the application, and then submit it with copies of several identifying documents. After reviewing their records, DHS notifies the traveler that if any corrections of data about them were warranted, they will be made.

Travelers who apply for redress through TRIP are assigned a record identifier called a "Redress Control Number". Airline reservations systems allow passengers who have a Redress Control Number to enter it when making their reservation.

DHS TRIP may make it easier for an airline to confirm a traveler's identity. False-positive travelers, whose names match or are similar to the names of persons on the No Fly List, will continue to match that name even after using DHS TRIP, so it will not restore a traveler's ability to use Internet or curbside check-in or to use an automated kiosk. It does usually help the airline identify the traveler as not being the actual person on the No Fly List, after an airline agent has reviewed their identity documents at check-in.

However, DHS TRIP has not been very helpful to travelers who accidentally end up on the No Fly List, as their efforts to clear their names are often futile to the extent that they are not told why they are on the list.[59]

Lawsuits

On April 6, 2004, the American Civil Liberties Union "filed a nationwide class-action challenge to the government's No Fly List", in which they charge that "many innocent travelers who pose no security risk whatsoever are discovering that their government considers them terrorists – and find that they have no way to find out why they are on the list, and no way to clear their names."[60] The case was settled in 2006, when "the federal government agreed to pay $200,000 in attorneys' fees to the ACLU of Northern California" and to "[make] public, for the first time, hundreds of records about the government's secret 'no fly' list used to screen airline passengers after September 11, 2001."[6] On August 5, 2010, the ACLU filed a lawsuit on behalf of 14 plaintiffs challenging their placement on the No Fly List.[61] and on June 24, 2014, U.S. District Judge Anna J. Brown ruled in favor of the plaintiffs saying that air travel is a “sacred” liberty protected by the U.S. Constitution[62] and ordered the government to change its system for challenging inclusion.[61]

A Malaysian academic has been the first to successfully bring a suit involving the No Fly List to trial. On August 18, 2008, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco issued a ruling on behalf of Rahinah Ibrahim, overturning a lower court decision and allowing her case against inclusion in the No Fly List to proceed through the court system.[63] A public trial began on December 2, 2013 in San Francisco in the courtroom of U.S. District Judge William Alsup.[64] The judge frequently cleared the courtroom following the requests of government lawyers (even though the judge himself once declared that the reasons "don't make much sense sometimes.")[65] After the government revealed that Ibrahim had ended up on the list because of human error by the FBI,[66] Alsup ruled on January 14, 2014 "that Ibrahim did have the right to sue and ordered the government to tell Ibrahim whether she is still on the list."[67]

Gulet Mohamed, a U.S. citizen from Virginia, was placed on the no-fly list as a teenager in 2011 while he was visiting family in Kuwait. Because he was on the no-fly list, he was unable to return to the U.S. before his visa expired.[68] He was taken into custody in Kuwait for overstaying his visa, where he alleges that he “was repeatedly beaten and tortured by his interrogators,” one of whom spoke “perfect American English.”[69] Kuwaiti authorities tried to deport him to the U.S., but the airline denied him boarding, presumably because he was on the U.S. no-fly list, and he was returned to prison. While he was imprisoned in Kuwait, a lawsuit was filed on his behalf in the Eastern District of Virginia by the Council on American Islamic Relations. After the lawsuit was filed, he was allowed to return to the U.S.; the U.S. government then moved to dismiss the lawsuit as moot.[70] On May 28, 2013, the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the government's motion to dismiss Mohamed's lawsuit.[71] On January 22, 2014, Judge Anthony J. Trenga denied most of another government motion to dismiss the lawsuit, allowing the case to proceed toward trial.[72]

Controversy

Among the complaints about the No Fly List is the use of credit reports in calculating the risk score. In response to the controversy, Transportation Security Administration (TSA) officials said in 2005 that they would not use credit scores to determine passengers' risk score and that they would comply with all rights guaranteed by the First and Fourth Amendments.[73]

The European Union and other non-U.S. government entities have expressed concern about allowing the CAPPS II proposal to be implemented within their borders. During the early testing of the No Fly List and CAPPS II, the TSA privately asked airlines to disclose massive amounts of personal information about their passengers. This action has been said to be a violation of the Privacy Act of 1974, which forbids the government to compile secret databases on U.S. citizens.

The No Fly List has been variously described as Orwellian and Kafkaesque. Individuals usually do not know they have been put on the list until they attempt to board a plane. Efforts to discover the reasons for being barred from flying meet with indeterminate responses from the authorities, which would neither confirm nor deny that a name is on the List.[65]

In the midst of this controversy, the Government Accountability Office of the U.S. Congress produced a report critical of the CAPPS II system. It characterized the proposal as incomplete and seriously behind schedule, and noted that the TSA had failed to address "developmental, operational, and privacy issues identified by Congress". On July 14, 2004, TSA officials announced that CAPPS II was being pulled from consideration without proceeding to full testing. Critics have alleged that the TSA has merely chosen to start with a less controversial entry point that they are calling the "Registered Traveler" program.[74] TSA has also begun testing of another program called "Secure Flight", which is supposed to solve some of the problems of CAPPS I while avoiding the privacy issues of CAPPS II.

In January 2009, Marcus Holmes[75] conservatively estimated the total cost of the program to be $536 million since 9/11, with a reasonable estimation range that approaches $1 billion, and he questioned whether the benefits of the list outweigh the costs.[76]

No fly lists in other countries

The government of Canada has created its own no fly list as part of a program called Passenger Protect.[77] The Canadian list incorporates data from domestic and foreign intelligence sources, including the U.S. No Fly List.[78] It contains between 500 and 2,000 names.[79]

See also

References

  1. Shane, Scott (May 11, 2010). "Senators Demand Tighter Rules on No-Fly List and Addition to Terror Group List". The New York Times (Washington). p. A9. Retrieved 27 November 2010.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 Donohue 2008, p. 254
  3. 1 2 3 ""TSA Watch Lists, December 2002" (PDF), a PowerPoint presentation by the U.S. Department of Transportation's Transportation Security Intelligence Service. Entered into public record as Attachment A, Part 1, during Gordon v. FBI, 2003." (PDF). Retrieved 2007-12-27.
  4. 1 2 Kroft, Steve; Ira Rosen (Producer) (8 October 2006). "Unlikely Terrorists On No-Fly List". 60 Minutes (CBS News). Retrieved 2006-12-16. Cite uses deprecated parameter |coauthors= (help)
  5. 1 2 3 Donohue 2008, p. 255
  6. 1 2 3 "TSA and FBI Ordered to Pay $200,000 to Settle "No Fly" Lawsuit" (Press release). American Civil Liberties Union. 24 January 2006. Retrieved 2015-05-24.
  7. Associated Press, Feds to pay ACLU $200,000 to settle no-fly list dispute (January 25, 2006).
  8. "FBI — TSC Vision & Mission". Terrorist Screening Center. Federal Bureau of Investigation. August 10, 2010. Retrieved November 17, 2011.
  9. "Justice Department report tells of flaws in terrorist watch list". CNN. September 6, 2007. Retrieved 2007-12-25. As of April 2007, the terrorist watch list, which consolidated more than a dozen federal agency terror lists, contained 700,000 records, and the database continues to increase by an average of more than 20,000 records each month, the report states.
  10. Terrorist watch list at airports tops 1 million names, Los Angeles Times. Retrieved July 20, 2008.
  11. Eisler, Peter (March 10, 2009). "Terrorist watch list hits 1 million". USA Today. Retrieved December 22, 2013.
  12. Walter Pincus (November 1, 2009). "1,600 are suggested daily for FBI's list". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 17, 2011.
  13. "Terrorist watch lists shorter than previously reported". CNN. October 22, 2008. Retrieved May 20, 2010.
  14. Jamie Tarabay (January 26, 2011). "The No-Fly List: FBI Says It's Smaller Than You Think". NPR. Retrieved November 17, 2011.
  15. A.H. (February 21, 2011). "How the American no-fly list applies outside America". The Economist (The Economist Newspaper Limited). Retrieved November 17, 2011.
  16. "US No-Fly list doubles in 1 year". NPR. February 2, 2012. Retrieved July 17, 2013.
  17. "In First, Government Officially Tells ACLU Clients Their No Fly List Status". ACLU. October 10, 2014. Retrieved November 27, 2014.
  18. "FBI — TSC Vision & Mission". Terrorist Screening Center. Federal Bureau of Investigation. August 10, 2010. Retrieved November 17, 2011.
  19. 1 2 3 4 Jeff Stein, Terrorist Watch List No Bar to Buying Guns, Newsweek (December 3, 2015).
  20. 1 2 Ailsa Chang, People on Terrorism Watch List Not Blocked From Buying Guns, NPR (April 24, 2013).
  21. William Branigin, N.Y. mayor decries 'terror gap' in U.S. gun laws, Washington Post (May 5, 2010).
  22. Donovan Slack, Paul Singer & Erin Kelly, Republicans say no to new gun control legislation after San Bernardino, USA Today (December 3, 2015).
  23. DHS Announces New Aviation Security and Traveler Screening Enhancements, DHS, April 28, 2008.
  24. Miller, Leslie (Associated Press) (15 August 2005). "'No-fly list' grounds some unusual young suspects". Boston Globe. Retrieved 2008-05-24.
  25. Sharkey, Joe (30 September 2008). "ON THE ROAD; Not Too Small to Appear On a Big No-Fly Watch List". The New York Times. p. 5. Retrieved 10 October 2008.
  26. "Airline pulls 18 month old girl off plane in 'no-fly' alert". The Telegraph (London). 11 May 2012. Retrieved 11 May 2012.
  27. "‘No-fly’ list delays Marine's homecoming – World news – Mideast/N. Africa – Conflict in Iraq – NBC News". MSNBC.
  28. ACLU sues U.S. over 'no-fly' list, CNN, April 6, 2004.
  29. Due Process Vanishes in Thin Air, Wired, April 8, 2003
  30. NYCLU Calls For Relief For New York Man In Mistaken Identity “No Fly” Dilemma, New York Civil Liberties Union, March 29, 2004
  31. Pakistani American Repeatedly Detained: Mistaken identity confuses security authorities, Asian Week, April 9, 2004
  32. Profiled: for one New York businessman, sharing his name with a terrorist has been a yearlong nightmare, National Catholic Reporter, September 6, 2002
  33. LoTemplio, Joe (22 February 2006). "Congressional candidate put on no-fly list". PressRepublican.com. Retrieved 2006-12-16.
  34. Greene, Thomas C (19 August 2004). "Database snafu puts US Senator on terror watch list". The Register. Retrieved 2006-12-16.
  35. Rudolph W. Giuliani: The Resilient Society. A blueprint for homeland security. City Journal winter 2008, vol.18, no.1
  36. Barrett, Ted; Staff (20 August 2004). "Kennedy has company on airline watch list". Politics (CNN). Retrieved 2006-12-16.
  37. Wente, Margaret (19 June 2007). "Are you feeling safer now?". The Globe and Mail (Toronto). Retrieved 2007-06-21.
  38. Michael Streeter and Steve Boggan (2 July 1997). "IRA team who planned terror blitz on capital given 35 years". The Independent.
  39. Wolf, Naomi (April 24, 2007). "Fascist America, in 10 easy steps". The Guardian (London). Retrieved May 20, 2010.
  40. 1 2 Sharkey, Joe (14 February 2006). "Jumping Through Hoops to Get Off the No-Fly List". On the road. Retrieved 2006-12-16.
  41. Moe, Doug (7 October 2006). "'no-fly List' Snares Average Joes". The Capital Times (Madison.com). p. A2. Retrieved 2006-12-16.
  42. Radack, Jesselyn (April 30, 2010). "When whistle-blowers suffer: Jesselyn Radack". The Plain Dealer. Retrieved 2010-08-19.
  43. "Cat Stevens 'In the Dark' Over No-Fly List". ABC News. 1 October 2004. Retrieved 2006-12-16.
  44. "The Testimony of U.S. Senator Ted Stevens (R-Alaska)". Committee Hearing: TSA's Secure Flight and Registered Traveler Programs. United States Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation. 9 February 2006. Archived from the original on December 13, 2006. Retrieved 2006-12-16.
  45. Sara Kehaulani Goo (9 October 2004). "Faulty 'No-Fly' System Detailed". Business. pp. A01. Retrieved 2006-12-16.
  46. Hudson, Audrey (2008-04-30). "Air marshals grounded in list mix-ups". The Washington Times. Retrieved 2008-05-01.
  47. "Airline captain, lawyer, child on terror 'watch list'". CNN. August 19, 2008. Retrieved May 20, 2010.
  48. "Quebec man changes name to dodge relentless airport screening". CBC News. September 11, 2008. Archived from the original on September 17, 2008.
  49. Rein, Lisa (8 October 2008). "Md. Police Put Activists' Names On Terror Lists". The Washington Post. Retrieved 9 November 2010.
  50. Samuel, Henry (April 24, 2009). "US authorites (sic) divert Air France flight carrying 'no-fly' journalist to Mexico". The Daily Telegraph (London). Retrieved May 20, 2010.
  51. Blechschmidt, Peter. "USA: Überflugsrechte: Der gesperrte Himmel". sueddeutsche.de (in German). ISSN 0174-4917. Retrieved 2016-04-13.
  52. "Bollywood star Shah Rukh Khan detained at US airport". The Daily Telegraph (London). 17 August 2009. Retrieved 24 September 2010.
  53. 1 2 Shane, Scott (June 15, 2010). "American Man in Limbo on No-Fly List". The New York Times (New York). Retrieved June 16, 2010.
  54. "Virginia Man Flies Home on Waiver". The New York Times (New York). July 18, 2010. Retrieved December 7, 2015.
  55. Michael Winter (September 12, 2011). "Oregon Muslim on U.S. no-fly list held after sailing to Britain". USA Today.
  56. MATTHEW BARAKAT (September 12, 2011). "US citizen to Italy after detention in England". Associated Press.
  57. Guzzardi, Will (March 21, 2011). "Veteran Abe Mashal On No-Fly List For Reported Emails To Cleric About Parenting". The Huffington Post. Retrieved 29 March 2012.
  58. Lindorff, Dave (2002-11-15), "Grounded: A federal agency confirms that it maintains an air-travel blacklist of 1,000 people.", Salon, retrieved 2014-02-01 It's not clear why Stuber was targeted. He was initially pulled aside after loudly declaring to a fellow passenger, "George Bush is as dumb as a rock." He was on the list for over 2 years but was later allowed to fly. Stuber, Doug (2011-11-07), Dougstuber's Blog: Stuber V. Crawley and Stanley 1
  59. Singel, Ryan (2007-11-27). "Stuck Inside a Watch List With the Redress Blues Again". Wired News. Archived from the original on August 22, 2010. Retrieved 22 August 2010.
  60. "Gordon v. FBI". Landmark Cases. American Civil Liberties Union. 22 April 2003. Retrieved 2006-12-16.
  61. 1 2 "Latif, et al. v. Holder, et al. – ACLU Challenge to Government No Fly List". American Civil Liberties Union.
  62. Phelps, Timothy M.; Muskal, Michael (24 June 2014), "Federal judge declares government no-fly list rules unconstitutional", Los Angeles Times, retrieved 26 June 2014
  63. Egelko, Bob (August 19, 2008). "Court: Passengers can challenge no-fly list". The San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved 2008-08-20.
  64. Hasbrouck, Edward. ""No-fly" trial in San Francisco this week". The Practical Nomad. Hasbouck.org. Retrieved 15 February 2014.
  65. 1 2 "Papers, Please!". papersplease.org.
  66. David Kravets. "How Obama Officials Cried 'Terrorism' to Cover Up a Paperwork Error", Wired, February 11, 2014. Retrieved July 24, 2014.
  67. Hafiz, Yasmine (2014-01-25 <!- – 4:01 pm EST -->), "Rahinah Ibrahim Wins No-Fly List Ruling: Muslim Woman Contests Controversial Program", The Huffington Post (01/16/2014 4:20 pm EST), retrieved 2014-02-01 Check date values in: |date=, |publication-date= (help) Dr. Ibrahim was represented by the San Jose-based law firm of McManis Faulkner.
  68. Mazzetti, Mark (5 January 2011). "Detained American Says He Was Beaten in Kuwait". The New York Times. Retrieved 15 February 2014.
  69. Baumann, Nick (6 January 2011). "Did the US Government Have an American Teenager Beaten In Kuwait?". Mother Jones. Retrieved 15 February 2014.
  70. "DHS, FBI still try to evade judicial review of no-fly orders". PapersPlease.org. Retrieved 15 February 2014.
  71. "4th Circuit Court of Appeals upholds right to judicial review of no-fly order". PapersPlease.org. Retrieved 15 February 2014.
  72. "4th Circuit Court of Appeals upholds right to judicial review of no-fly order". PapersPlease.org. Retrieved 15 February 2014.
  73. Meckler, Laura (2005-09-22). "Security List for Air Travelers Won't Use Commercial Database". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 2007-12-27.
  74. Tom Paine
  75. "Marcus Holmes, Ph.D.". marcusholmes.com.
  76. Holmes, Marcus. "Just How Much Does That Cost, Anyway? An Analysis of the Financial Costs and Benefits of the "No-Fly" List". Homeland Security Affairs Journal. Retrieved 2009-01-30.
  77. "NEW Passenger Protect program". Retrieved 2007-06-19.
  78. "Passenger Protect Program". Archived from the original on March 3, 2007. Retrieved 2007-02-23.
  79. ""As many as 2,000 names on no-fly list: Cannon," CTV News". Retrieved 2007-06-28.

Sources

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Saturday, April 30, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.