Bartle v. Coleman
| Bartle v. Coleman | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| Decided March 10, 1821 | |||||||
| Full case name | ' | ||||||
| Citations | |||||||
| Court membership | |||||||
| |||||||
| Case opinions | |||||||
| Majority | Marshall | ||||||
Bartle v. Coleman, 19 U.S. 475 (1821), was a United States Supreme Court case.
Background
Andrew Bartle, George Coleman, and Ferdinand Marsteller had entered into a contract with the United States government to rebuild a location called Fort Washington, possibly meaning Fort Washington (Maryland) which was captured by the British in the War of 1812.[1]
Arbitrators had rules that Bartle should pay Coleman.[1]
Opinion
The Supreme Court reversed the judgement.[2]
See also
References
- 1 2 Statement of Thomas Swann, attorney for plaintiff Bartle
- ↑ 19 U.S. 475 - Bartle v. Coleman at openjurist.org
 |
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Bartle v. Coleman. |
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Wednesday, December 16, 2015. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.