Stress measures

The most commonly used measure of stress is the Cauchy stress tensor, often called simply the stress tensor or "true stress". However, several other measures of stress can be defined.^[1][2][3] Some such stress measures that are widely used in continuum mechanics, particularly in the computational context, are:

1. The Kirchhoff stress ($\boldsymbol{\tau}$).
2. The Nominal stress ($\boldsymbol{N}$).
3. The first Piola-Kirchhoff stress ($\boldsymbol{P}$). This stress tensor is the transpose of the nominal stress ($\boldsymbol{P} = \boldsymbol{N}^T$).
4. The second Piola-Kirchhoff stress or PK2 stress ($\boldsymbol{S}$).
5. The Biot stress ($\boldsymbol{T}$)

Definitions of stress measures

Consider the situation shown the following figure. The following definitions use the notations shown in the figure.

Quantities used in the definition of stress measures

In the reference configuration $\Omega_0$, the outward normal to a surface element $d\Gamma_0$ is $\mathbf{N} \equiv \mathbf{n}_0$ and the traction acting on that surface is $\mathbf{t}_0$ leading to a force vector $d\mathbf{f}_0$. In the deformed configuration $\Omega$, the surface element changes to $d\Gamma$ with outward normal $\mathbf{n}$ and traction vector $\mathbf{t}$ leading to a force $d\mathbf{f}$. Note that this surface can either be a hypothetical cut inside the body or an actual surface. The quantity $\boldsymbol{F}$ is the deformation gradient tensor, $J$ is its determinant.

Cauchy stress

The Cauchy stress (or true stress) is a measure of the force acting on an element of area in the deformed configuration. This tensor is symmetric and is defined via

$d\mathbf{f} = \mathbf{t}~d\Gamma = \boldsymbol{\sigma}^T\cdot\mathbf{n}~d\Gamma$

or

$\mathbf{t} = \boldsymbol{\sigma}^T\cdot\mathbf{n}$

where $\mathbf{t}$ is the traction and $\mathbf{n}$ is the normal to the surface on which the traction acts.

Kirchhoff stress

The quantity $\boldsymbol{\tau} = J~\boldsymbol{\sigma}$ is called the Kirchhoff stress tensor and is used widely in numerical algorithms in metal plasticity (where there is no change in volume during plastic deformation).

Nominal stress/First Piola-Kirchhoff stress

The nominal stress $\boldsymbol{N}=\boldsymbol{P}^T$ is the transpose of the first Piola-Kirchhoff stress (PK1 stress) $\boldsymbol{P}$ and is defined via

$d\mathbf{f} = \mathbf{t}_0~d\Gamma_0 = \boldsymbol{N}^T\cdot\mathbf{n}_0~d\Gamma_0 = \boldsymbol{P}\cdot\mathbf{n}_0~d\Gamma_0$

or

$\mathbf{t}_0 = \boldsymbol{N}^T\cdot\mathbf{n}_0 = \boldsymbol{P}\cdot\mathbf{n}_0$

This stress is unsymmetric and is a two point tensor like the deformation gradient. This is because it relates the force in the deformed configuration to an oriented area vector in the reference configuration.

Second Piola-Kirchhoff stress

If we pull back $d\mathbf{f}$ to the reference configuration, we have

$d\mathbf{f}_0 = \boldsymbol{F}^{-1}\cdot d\mathbf{f}$

or,

$d\mathbf{f}_0 = \boldsymbol{F}^{-1}\cdot \boldsymbol{N}^T\cdot\mathbf{n}_0~d\Gamma_0 = \boldsymbol{F}^{-1}\cdot \mathbf{t}_0~d\Gamma_0$

The PK2 stress ($\boldsymbol{S}$) is symmetric and is defined via the relation

$d\mathbf{f}_0 = \boldsymbol{S}^T\cdot\mathbf{n}_0~d\Gamma_0 = \boldsymbol{F}^{-1}\cdot \mathbf{t}_0~d\Gamma_0$

Therefore,

$\boldsymbol{S}^T\cdot\mathbf{n}_0 = \boldsymbol{F}^{-1}\cdot\mathbf{t}_0$

Biot stress

The Biot stress is useful because it is energy conjugate to the right stretch tensor $\boldsymbol{U}$. The Biot stress is defined as the symmetric part of the tensor $\boldsymbol{P}^T\cdot\boldsymbol{R}$ where $\boldsymbol{R}$ is the rotation tensor obtained from a polar decomposition of the deformation gradient. Therefore the Biot stress tensor is defined as

$\boldsymbol{T} = \tfrac{1}{2}(\boldsymbol{R}^T\cdot\boldsymbol{P} + \boldsymbol{P}^T\cdot\boldsymbol{R}) ~.$

The Biot stress is also called the Jaumann stress.

The quantity $\boldsymbol{T}$ does not have any physical interpretation. However, the unsymmetrized Biot stress has the interpretation

$\boldsymbol{R}^T~d\mathbf{f} = (\boldsymbol{P}^T\cdot\boldsymbol{R})^T\cdot\mathbf{n}_0~d\Gamma_0$

Relations between stress measures

Relations between Cauchy stress and nominal stress

From Nanson's formula relating areas in the reference and deformed configurations:

$\mathbf{n}~d\Gamma = J~\boldsymbol{F}^{-T}\cdot\mathbf{n}_0~d\Gamma_0$

Now,

$\boldsymbol{\sigma}^T\cdot\mathbf{n}~d\Gamma = d\mathbf{f} = \boldsymbol{N}^T\cdot\mathbf{n}_0~d\Gamma_0$

Hence,

$\boldsymbol{\sigma}^T\cdot (J~\boldsymbol{F}^{-T}\cdot\mathbf{n}_0~d\Gamma_0) = \boldsymbol{N}^T\cdot\mathbf{n}_0~d\Gamma_0$

or,

$\boldsymbol{N}^T = J~(\boldsymbol{F}^{-1}\cdot\boldsymbol{\sigma})^T = J~\boldsymbol{\sigma}^T\cdot\boldsymbol{F}^{-T}$

or,

$\boldsymbol{N} = J~\boldsymbol{F}^{-1}\cdot\boldsymbol{\sigma} \qquad \text{and} \qquad \boldsymbol{N}^T = \boldsymbol{P} = J~\boldsymbol{\sigma}^T\cdot\boldsymbol{F}^{-T}$

In index notation,

$N_{Ij} = J~F_{Ik}^{-1}~\sigma_{kj} \qquad \text{and} \qquad P_{iJ} = J~\sigma_{ki}~F^{-1}_{Jk}$

Therefore,

$J~\boldsymbol{\sigma} = \boldsymbol{F}\cdot\boldsymbol{N} = \boldsymbol{P}\cdot\boldsymbol{F}^T~.$

Note that $\boldsymbol{N}$ and $\boldsymbol{P}$ are not symmetric because $\boldsymbol{F}$ is not symmetric.

Relations between nominal stress and second P-K stress

Recall that

$\boldsymbol{N}^T\cdot\mathbf{n}_0~d\Gamma_0 = d\mathbf{f}$

and

$d\mathbf{f} = \boldsymbol{F}\cdot d\mathbf{f}_0 = \boldsymbol{F} \cdot (\boldsymbol{S}^T \cdot \mathbf{n}_0~d\Gamma_0)$

Therefore,

$\boldsymbol{N}^T\cdot\mathbf{n}_0 = \boldsymbol{F}\cdot\boldsymbol{S}^T\cdot\mathbf{n}_0$

or (using the symmetry of $\boldsymbol{S}$),

$\boldsymbol{N} = \boldsymbol{S}\cdot\boldsymbol{F}^T \qquad \text{and} \qquad \boldsymbol{P} = \boldsymbol{F}\cdot\boldsymbol{S}$

In index notation,

$N_{Ij} = S_{IK}~F^T_{jK} \qquad \text{and} \qquad P_{iJ} = F_{iK}~S_{KJ}$

Alternatively, we can write

$\boldsymbol{S} = \boldsymbol{N}\cdot\boldsymbol{F}^{-T} \qquad \text{and} \qquad \boldsymbol{S} = \boldsymbol{F}^{-1}\cdot\boldsymbol{P}$

Relations between Cauchy stress and second P-K stress

Recall that

$\boldsymbol{N} = J~\boldsymbol{F}^{-1}\cdot\boldsymbol{\sigma}$

In terms of the 2nd PK stress, we have

$\boldsymbol{S}\cdot\boldsymbol{F}^T = J~\boldsymbol{F}^{-1}\cdot\boldsymbol{\sigma}$

Therefore,

$\boldsymbol{S} = J~\boldsymbol{F}^{-1}\cdot\boldsymbol{\sigma}\cdot\boldsymbol{F}^{-T} = \boldsymbol{F}^{-1}\cdot\boldsymbol{\tau}\cdot\boldsymbol{F}^{-T}$

In index notation,

$S_{IJ} = F_{Ik}^{-1}~\tau_{kl}~F_{Jl}^{-1}$

Since the Cauchy stress (and hence the Kirchhoff stress) is symmetric, the 2nd PK stress is also symmetric.

Alternatively, we can write

$\boldsymbol{\sigma} = J^{-1}~\boldsymbol{F}\cdot\boldsymbol{S}\cdot\boldsymbol{F}^T$

or,

$\boldsymbol{\tau} = \boldsymbol{F}\cdot\boldsymbol{S}\cdot\boldsymbol{F}^T ~.$

Clearly, from definition of the push-forward and pull-back operations, we have

$\boldsymbol{S} = \varphi^{*}[\boldsymbol{\tau}] = \boldsymbol{F}^{-1}\cdot\boldsymbol{\tau}\cdot\boldsymbol{F}^{-T}$

and

$\boldsymbol{\tau} = \varphi_{*}[\boldsymbol{S}] = \boldsymbol{F}\cdot\boldsymbol{S}\cdot\boldsymbol{F}^T~.$

Therefore, $\boldsymbol{S}$ is the pull back of $\boldsymbol{\tau}$ by $\boldsymbol{F}$ and $\boldsymbol{\tau}$ is the push forward of $\boldsymbol{S}$.

See also

• Stress (physics)
• Finite strain theory
• Continuum mechanics
• Hyperelastic material
• Cauchy elastic material

References

1. J. Bonet and R. W. Wood, Nonlinear Continuum Mechanics for Finite Element Analysis, Cambridge University Press.
2. R. W. Ogden, 1984, Non-linear Elastic Deformations, Dover.
3. L. D. Landau, E. M. Lifshitz, Theory of Elasticity, third edition