Board of Education of Oklahoma City v. Dowell
Board of Education of Oklahoma City v. Dowell | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Argued October 2, 1990 Decided January 15, 1991 | |||||||
Full case name | Board of Education of Oklahoma City Public Schools, Independent School District No. 80, Oklahoma County, Oklahoma v. Robert L. Dowell, et al. | ||||||
Citations | |||||||
Prior history | Cert. to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit | ||||||
Holding | |||||||
The Court of Appeals' test for dissolving a desegregation decree is more stringent than is required either by this Court's decisions dealing with injunctions or by the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. | |||||||
Court membership | |||||||
| |||||||
Case opinions | |||||||
Majority | Rehnquist, joined by White, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy | ||||||
Dissent | Marshall, joined by Blackmun, Stevens | ||||||
Souter took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. |
Board of Education of Oklahoma City v. Dowell, 498 U.S. 237 (1991), United States Supreme Court case "hasten[ing] the end of federal court desegregation orders."[1] The Court held that a federal desegregation order should be ended even though it meant that schools would become re-segregated since the Oklahoma schools had been arranged into a unitary system.
See also
- National Gay Task Force v. Board of Education: An employment law case for the Oklahoma City schools
References
- ↑ Chemerinsky, Erwin (2005). Constitutional Law. New York: Aspen Publishers. p. 703.
External links
- Board of Ed. of Oklahoma City Public Schools v. Dowell, 498 U.S. 237 (1991) (opinion full text).
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Wednesday, August 19, 2015. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.