Brachypodosaurus
| Brachypodosaurus Temporal range: Late Cretaceous, 66 Ma | |
|---|---|
| Scientific classification | |
| Kingdom: | Animalia |
| Phylum: | Chordata |
| Class: | Sauropsida |
| Superorder: | ?Dinosauria |
| Order: | ?Ornithischia |
| Suborder: | ?Thyreophora |
| Infraorder: | ?Ankylosauria |
| Genus: | Brachypodosaurus Chakravarti, 1934 |
| Species: | B. gravis Chakravarti, 1934 |
| Binomial name | |
| Brachypodosaurus gravis | |
Brachypodosaurus (meaning "short-footed lizard") is a dubious genus of possibly thyreophoran dinosaur from the Late Cretaceous Lameta Formation (Maastrichtian) in India.
The only remains discovered so far for this animal consist of a single fossil bone, excavated at the Chota Simla Hill near Jabalpur. In 1934, geologist Dhirendra Kishore Chakravarti, of the Geological Museum of the Banaras Hindu University, considered it a humerus, of a stegosaurian. He named it as the type species Brachypodosaurus gravis. The generic name is derived from Greek βραχύς, brachys, "short", and πούς, pous, "foot". The specific name gravis means "heavy" in Latin.[1] Chakravarti hereby became the first local scientist to name a dinosaur.
The holotype is IM V9. The bone is over a foot long. Chakravarti based his identification of the element as a humerus on the presence of a large crest on the shaft, which he took for the deltopectoral crest. The status as a (dinosaurian) humerus is problematic. The bone is flat, has a crest on the other side of the shaft also, is not twisted around its longitudinal axis, is strongly constricted above and below the crests and lacks a clear caput or condyles. In any case, it lacks stegosaurian synapomorphies.[2] On the assumption it might at least be some member of the Thyreophora, it has been considered a possible ankylosaurian, the ankylosaurs being a sister group of the Stegosauria that survived into the Late Cretaceous. Even then, however, it was considered a nomen dubium as so few remains of the animal have been found.[3] In 2004, Matthew Lamanna e.a. considered it unlikely that any Ornithischia were present in the Maastrichtian of India.[4] The other Late Cretaceous genus from India originally described as a stegosaur, Dravidosaurus, is also a nomen dubium based on plesiosaurian remains.
References
- ↑ Chakravarti, D. K., 1934, "On a stegosaurian humerus from the Lameta beds of Jubbulpore", Quarterly Journal of the Geological, Mining, and Metallurgical Society of India, 30; 75-79
- ↑ Wilson, J. A., P. C. Sereno, S. Srivastava, D. K. Bhatt, A. Khosla, and A. Sahni. 2003. "A new abelisaurid (Dinosauria, Theropoda) from the Lameta Formation (Cretaceous, Maastrichtian) of India", Contributions from the Museum of Paleontology of the University of Michigan, 31:1–42
- ↑ Maryanska T., 1977. "Ankylosauridae (Dinosauria) from Mongolia", Palaeontologia Polonica 37:85-151
- ↑ Lamanna, M.C., J.B. Smith, Y.S. Attia, and P. Dodson, 2004, "From dinosaurs to dyrosaurids (Crocodyliformes): removal of the post-Cenomanian (Late Cretaceous) record of Ornithischia from Africa", Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 24: 764-768