California Reform Sex Offender Laws
This article is part of a series on the |
Sex offender registries in the United States |
---|
Legislation
|
Constitutionality |
Social issues
|
Type | Non-profit organization |
---|---|
Purpose | Civil rights advocacy, Reforming sex offender laws |
Headquarters | Los Angeles, California |
President | Janice Bellucci |
Vice President | Chance Oberstein |
Website | californiarsol.org |
California Reform Sex Offender Laws, also CA RSOL, is a civil rights, legal reform, and support organization, based in Los Angeles, for people required to register as sex offenders, and their families. CA RSOL is one of more than 50 reform organizations movement to reform sex offender laws in the United States, and an affiliate of the national Reform Sex Offender Laws, Inc.
Purpose
CA RSOL advocates for registrants' constitutional rights and for legislation that is based on scientific research instead of fear and panic. The organization is dedicated to restoring the civil rights of those convicted of sexual crimes. To achieve this objective, CA RSOL initiates and supports legal action, legislation and public outreach.[1] It aims to educate law-makers and public that sex offenders are diverse group of individuals; that contrary to popular belief, general recidivism rate of 5% over 5 years[2] is the second lowest of all offender groups;[3] and that residency restrictions and public notification have no demonstrable effect on recidivism and might actually undermine public safety,[4] thus making onerous restrictions and stigmatizing effect of public sex offender lists unfair and unfounded when applied broadly to all offenders without considering the individual risk and underlying facts of individual cases.
CA RSOL condemns all sexual offending, but holds that current sex offender registration laws and policies that paint all sex offenders with one broad brush, without considering actual facts of individual cases and the risk posed by the offender, are counterproductive, waste law enforcement resources and taxpayers money, while causing needless harm to many registrants and their family members. They say, the money spend on further punishing ex-offenders who have served their court imposed sentence, should be used for prevention, healing, and rehabilitation.[1]
Lawsuits
CA RSOL has engaged in legal battles challenging local Halloween ordinances,[5] and residency restrictions aimed at registrants in federal court across the state of California.[6][7][8] During 2014 over 20 municipalities has been sued by CA RSOL.[9] As of October 11, 15 of the lawsuits had been settled, 38 cities had avoided litigation by revoking their sex offender ordinances, and 6 cities had chosen to discontinue enforcing the ordinances. At the time, sex offender ordinances were under review in 18 additional cities.[10] CA RSOLs efforts culminated in March 2015 when Supreme Court of California struck down part of the California Proposition 83 (2006) declaring San Diego Countys blanket residency restrictions imposed on all offender regardless of the facts of individual cases unconstitutional. Court cited restrictions unfairness and counterproductive effects, stating that blanket policies "infringed their liberty and privacy interests, however limited, while bearing no rational relationship to advancing the state’s legitimate goal of protecting children from sexual predators."[11] CA RSOL is currently planning to sue other municipal ordinances that go further than states Jessica’s Law.[12]
See also
- Arkansas Time After Time
- Reform Sex Offender Laws, Inc.
- Florida Action Committee
- Advocates For Change
- USA FAIR, Inc.
- Illinois Voices for Reform
- Michigan Citizens for Justice
- Women Against Registry - W.A.R
References
- 1 2 "About Us - CA RSOL". California Reform Sex Offender Laws, Inc.
- ↑ Zgoba, Kristen; Miner, Michael; Knight, Raymond; Letourneau, Elizabeth; Levenson, Jill; Thorton, David. "A Multi - State Recidivism Study Using Static - 99R and Static - 2002 Risk Scores and Tier Guidelines from the Adam Walsh Act" (PDF). National Institute of Justice.
- ↑ Langan, Patrick A.; Schmitt, Erica L.; Durose, Matthew R. (2003). "Recidivism of Sex Offenders Released from Prison in 1994" (PDF). U.S. Department of Justice.
- ↑ "Sex Offender Registration and Notification". Sex Offender Management Assessment and Planning Initiative. Office of Justice Programs.
- ↑ Case, Stephanie (September 19, 2013). "City of Orange Sued Over Sex Offender Halloween Restrictions". KTLA 5.
- ↑ Blow, Steve (17 July 2014). "We can do better on sex offender laws". The Dallas Morning News. Retrieved 14 November 2014.
- ↑ Belluci, Janice (21 July 2013). "CA RSOL Challenges El Dorado County Sex Offender Ordinance". In Eldorado County News. Retrieved 14 November 2014.
- ↑ Howes, Rebecca (April 24, 2014). "Attorney files sex offender lawsuit against Lompoc". Lompoc Record. Retrieved 14 November 2014.
- ↑ Johnson, Shea (Oct 21, 2014). "County sued over sex offender ordinance". Daily Press. Retrieved 14 November 2014.
- ↑ Nelson, Joe (10 November 2014). "SPECIAL REPORT: Pair seeks repeal of sex-offender laws in California". Daily Breeze. Retrieved 14 November 2014.
- ↑ "Housing Restrictions For Sex Offenders Unconstitutional, California Court Rules". The Huffington Post.
- ↑ "CALIFORNIA: Sex offender law too restrictive, court rules". The Press Entrprise. 2 March 2015.
External links
- California Reform Sex Offender Laws
- Reform Sex Offender Laws, Inc.
- Registrants and Families Support Line