Charles Cooley

Charles Horton Cooley
Born (1864-08-17)17 August 1864
Ann Arbor, Michigan
Died 7 May 1929(1929-05-07) (aged 65)
Ann Arbor, Michigan
Alma mater University of Michigan
Institutions University of Michigan
Main interests
 Politics, economics, psychology, sociology, social psychology

Charles Horton Cooley (August 17, 1864 – May 7, 1929) was an American sociologist and the son of Thomas M. Cooley. He studied and went on to teach economics and sociology at the University of Michigan, and he was a founding member and the eighth president of the American Sociological Association. He is perhaps best known for his concept of the looking glass self, which is the concept that a person's self grows out of society's interpersonal interactions and the perceptions of others.

Biography

Charles Horton Cooley as a young man

Charles Horton Cooley was born in Ann Arbor, Michigan, on August 17, 1864, to Mary Elizabeth Horton and Thomas M. Cooley. His father was very successful in the legal field, and with a high social status he was well respected in the community.[1] Thomas Cooley was the Supreme Court Judge for the state of Michigan and was one of the first three faculty members to start the University of Michigan Law School and was later appointed the dean at the law school from 1859-1884.[2] His mother, Mary Elizabeth Horton took an active interest with public affairs and traveled with her husband to several cities around the United States in relation to the Interstate Commerce Commission.[3] Charles was the fourth of six children. His father was a very successful man that stressed the importance of education to his six children. Nevertheless, Cooley had a difficult childhood and was somewhat of a passive child.[4] The intimidation and alienation he felt by his own father at a young age took a toll in his life later on. Due to this situation, he suffered for fifteen years from a variety of illnesses, some appearing to be psychosomatic. He was shy and developed several insecurities due to his speech impediment, and lack of playmates.[5] Cooley was a day dreamer and many of his "dreaming-life" had some form of influence to his sociological works.[6] As a child he dealt with the feeling of isolation and loneliness, which led him to take an interest in reading and writing.[7][8][9]

Education

Cooley grave in front of Cooley family obelisk, Forest Hill Cemetery, Ann Arbor

At the age of sixteen Cooley started attending the University of Michigan. Cooley suffered from "obstetative elimination" which is an illness that affects the mental and physical health of individuals.[10] His illness negatively affected his college life since it caused him to take breaks from studying.[11] Due to his illness it took him seven years to graduate from the University of Michigan in 1887. Charles continued with a year's training in mechanical engineering at the same school. In 1888, he returned for a master's degree in political economics, with a minor in sociology. He began teaching economics and sociology at the University in the fall of 1892. Cooley went on to receive a PhD in 1894. His doctoral thesis was The Theory of Transportation in economics.


Since Cooley's father was honored nationwide, Cooley feared the idea of failure. He did not know where he belonged in life and did not know what he wanted to do with his life. He questioned if he wanted to study science, mathematics, social science, psychology or sociology. He wanted a job that allowed him to write and think. After reading philosopher's Herbert Spencer's works Cooley realized he had an interest for social problems. Cooley decided that he wanted to study sociology because it gave him the ability to think and analyze social problems.[12] He began teaching sociology in the academic year of 1894 to 1895.

Family life

Cooley married in 1890 to Elsie Jones, the daughter of a professor of medicine at the University of Michigan. His marriage enabled him to concentrate fully on scholarly work and the contemplative life he prized above all. A highly cultivated woman, Mrs. Cooley differed from her husband in that she was outgoing, energetic, and hence capable of ordering their common lives in such a manner that mundane cares were not to weigh very heavily on her husband. The couple had three children, a boy and two girls, and lived quietly and fairly withdrawn in a house close to the campus. The children served Cooley as a kind of domestic laboratory for his study of the genesis and growth of the self. He would observe imitation behavior in his three children and analyzed these behaviors by comparing their ages and reactions.[13] Hence, even when he was not engaged in the observation of his own self but wished to observe others, he did not need to leave the domestic circle.

Contributions to social theory

Cooley's methodology

Cooley is noted for his displeasure at the divisions within the sociological community over methodology. He preferred an empirical, observational approach. While he appreciated the use of statistics, he preferred case studies: often using his own children as the subjects on his observation.[14]

Theory on transportation and the shift to sociology

Cooley's first major work, The Theory of Transportation (1894), was in economic theory. In his thesis he discussed the growth and expansion during the nineteenth century.[15] This book was notable for its conclusion that towns and cities tend to be located at the confluence of transportation routes—the so-called break in transportation. Cooley soon shifted to broader analysis of the interplay of individual and social processes. In Human Nature and the Social Order (1902) he foreshadowed George Herbert Mead's discussion of the symbolic ground of the self by detailing the way in which social responses affect the emergence of normal social participation. Cooley greatly extended this conception of the "looking-glass self" (I am, who I think you think, that I am) in his next book, Social Organization (1909), in which he sketched a comprehensive approach to society and its major processes.

Social organization

The first sixty pages of Social Organization (1909) were a sociological antidote to Sigmund Freud. In that much-quoted segment Cooley formulated the crucial role of primary groups (family, play groups and community of elders) as the source of one's morals, sentiments, and ideals. Primary groups are the first group of individuals one is introduced to and are also influenced in their ideas and beliefs. They are the result of intimate association and corporation. He argued that individuals have two different channels of life- one from heredity and the other from society. Heredity is biological, it is the human nature that human beings are born with. Society is the human nature that is expressed in primary groups that we can be found in all civilizations.[16] But the impact of the primary group is so great that individuals cling to primary ideals in more complex associations and even create new primary groupings within formal organizations.

In the "Social Organization" Cooley asks what makes up a society. He focuses on the relationship between the individual to the larger unity of the society.[17] He viewed society and the individual as one since they cannot exist without one another. Where the society has a strong impact on the individual behavior and vice versa. He also concluded that the more industrialized a society becomes, the more individualistic it becomes.[18] Also Cooley viewed society as a constant experiment in enlarging social experience and in coordinating variety. He therefore analyzed the operation of such complex social forms as formal institutions and social class systems and the subtle controls of public opinion. Class differences reflect different contributions to society, as well as the phenomena of aggrandizement and exploitation.

Social process

Cooley's last major work, Social Process (1918) emphasized the non-rational, tentative nature of social organization and the significance of social competition. Social Process was more of an essay based work that expressed Cooley's social theories. It was more philosophical than sociological. He interpreted modern difficulties as the clash of primary group values (love, ambition, loyalty) and institutional values (impersonal ideologies such as progress or Protestantism). As societies try to cope with their difficulties, they adjust these two kinds of values to one another as best they can. Cooley also mentions the idea of heroes and hero worshiping. He believed that heroes were an aide or a servant to the internalization of social norms because they represent and serve as an example to reinforce social values.[19]

Cooley and social subjectivity

Cooley's theories were manifested in response to a threefold necessity that had developed within the realm of society. The first of which was the necessity to create an understanding of societal phenomena that highlighted the subjective mental processes of individuals yet realized that these subjective processes were effects and causes of society's processes. The second necessity examined the development of a social dynamic conception that portrayed states of chaos as natural occurrences which could provide opportunities for "adaptive innovation." Finally, a need to manifest publics that were capable of exerting some form of "informed moral control" over current problems and future directions.

In regards to these, aforementioned, dilemmas Cooley responded by stating "society and individual denote not separable phenomena but different aspects of the same thing, for a separate individual is an abstraction unknown to experience, and so likewise is society when regarded as something apart from individuals."[20] From this, he resolved to create a "Mental-Social" Complex of which he would term the "Looking-glass self."

The Looking-glass self is created through the imagination of how one's self might be understood by another individual. This would later be termed "Empathic Introspection." This theory applied not only to the individual but to the macro-level economic issues of society and to those macro-sociological conditions which are created over time.

To the economy, Cooley presented a divergent view from the norm, stating that "...even economic institutions could [not] be understood solely as a result of impersonal market forces." With regard to the sociological perspective and its relevancy toward traditions he states that the dissolution of traditions may be positive, thus creating "the sort of virtues, as well as of vices, that we find on the frontier: plain dealing, love of character and force, kindness, hope, hospitality and courage." He believed that Sociology continues to contribute to the "growing efficiency of the intellectual processes that would enlighten the larger public will."[21]

The "Looking Glass Self"

Main article: Looking glass self

The concept of the "looking glass-self" is undoubtedly his most famous, and is known and accepted by most psychologists and sociologists today. It expanded William James's idea of self to include the capacity of reflection on its own behavior. Other people's views build, change and maintain our self-image; thus, there is an interaction between how we see ourselves and how others see us. Through these interactions human beings develop the idea of who they are. He argued that when we feel shame or pride it is due to what we think others view us as. He also mentions that we do not always perceive someone's impressions correctly. For example, a student incorrectly answers a question in class he might later think that others view him as dumb or not prepared for class. looking glass-self is a never ending process since we are always interacting with new people and are always evaluating ourselves due to the impressions of what others view us as.[22]

According to Cooley (1902), in his work Human Nature and the Social Order, his "looking-glass self" involved three steps:

• You imagine how you appear to the other person.

• You imagine the judgment of the other person.

• You feel some sense of pride, happiness, guilt, or shame. [23]

Following William James thoughts, this concept of "looking glass-self" tied in to the destruction of "Cartesian disjunction between mind and the external social world." Cooley wanted to destroy the barrier the Cartesian thought erected between the individual and his society.[24]

A self-idea of this sort seems to have three principal elements: the imagination of our appearance to the other person; the imagination of his judgment of that appearance, and some sort of self-feeling, such as pride or mortification.
— Charles Cooley, Human Nature and the Social Order, p. 152

Cooley's works

Quotations

“ How is a man to find where he belongs in life? The more original he is, the less likely is he to find his place prepared for him. He must not expect to see from the beginning what mould his life will take... The power to work on faith is what distinguishes great men. ”
                   - Charles Cooley, Human Nature and the Social Order, p. 111
“ To get away from one's working environment is, in a sense, to get away from one's self; and this is often the chief advantage of travel and change. ”
                   - Charles Cooley, Human Nature and the Social Order, p. 120
“ The social self is simply any idea, or system of ideas, drawn from the communicative life, that the mind cherishes as its own ”

[25]

                   - Charles Cooley, Human Nature and the Social Order, p. 17
“ I imagine your mind, and especially what your mind thinks about my mind, and what your mind thinks about what my mind thinks about your mind. I dress my mind before yours and expect that you will dress yours before mine. Whoever cannot or will not perform these feats is not properly in the game. ”
                  -Charles Cooley, Human Nature and Social Order

See also

  1. Herbert Spencer

Source

References

Notes

  1. ↑ Jandy, Edward (1942). Charles Cooley His Life and His Social Theory. New York: The Dryden Press.
  2. ↑ http://www.bolenderinitiatives.com/sociology/charles-horton-cooley-1864-1929/
  3. ↑ Jandy, Edward (1942). Charles Cooley His Life and His Social Theory. New York: The Dryden Press.
  4. ↑ http://www.asanet.org/about/presidents/Charles_Cooley.cfm
  5. ↑ http://www.bolenderinitiatives.com/sociology/charles-horton-cooley-1864-1929/
  6. ↑ Page, Charles Hunt (1964). Class and American Sociology. New York: Octagon Books Inc. pp. 183–209.
  7. ↑ Jandy, Edward (1942). Charles Cooley His Life and His Social Theory. New York: The Dryden Press.
  8. ↑ Jandy, Edward (1942). Charles Cooley His Life and His Social Theory. New York: The Dryden Press.
  9. ↑ Goode,Furstenberg, Mitchell, William,Frank,Larry (1970). William W. Waller on the Family, Education and War. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
  10. ↑ Jandy, Edward (1942). Charles Horton Cooley His Life and His Social Theory. New York: The Dryden Press.
  11. ↑ Jandy, Edward (1942). Charles Horton Cooley His Life and His Social Theory. New York: The Dryden Press.
  12. ↑ Jandy, Edward (1942). Charles Horton His Life and His Social Theory. New York: The Dryden Press.
  13. ↑ Jandy, Edward (1942). Charles Horton Cooley His Life and His Social Theory. New York: The Dryden Press.
  14. ↑ Wood, A. E. (1930). Charles Horton Cooley: An Appreciation. The American Journal of Sociology, 35 (5), 707-717.
  15. ↑ Jandy, Edward (1942). Charles Horton Cooley His Life and His Social Theory. New York: The Dryden Press.
  16. ↑ Jandy, Edward (1942). Charles Horton Cooley His Life and His Social Theory. New York: The Dryden Press.
  17. ↑ Jandy, Edward (1942). Charles Horton Cooley His Life and His Social Theory. New York: The Dryden Press.
  18. ↑ Jandy, Edward (1942). Charles Horton Cooley His Life and His Social Theory. New York: The Dryden Press.
  19. ↑ Schwartz, Barry (Spring 1985). "Emerson, Cooley, and the American Heroic Vision". Symbolic Interaction 8 (1): 103–120.
  20. ↑ Cooley, Human Nature and the Social Order, 1902, p.35
  21. ↑ Levine, Donald N. Visions of the Sociological Tradition. The University of Chicago Press. 1995. pgs. 263-267
  22. ↑ Jandy, Edward (1942). Charles Horton Cooley His Life and His Social Theory. New York: The Dryden Press.
  23. ↑ Mann, Doug (2008), Understanding society : a survey of modern social theory, Oxford University Press. pg.183, ISBN 978-0-19-542184-2
  24. ↑ http://www.bolenderinitiatives.com/sociology/charles-horton-cooley-1864-1929/
  25. ↑ Sica, Alan. Social Thought: From the Enlightenment to the Present. Pennsylvania State University. 2005. p.321
Preceded by
George E. Howard		 President of the American Sociological Association
1917–1918 		Succeeded by
Frank W. Blackmar

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Tuesday, April 19, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.