Chow's lemma
Chow's lemma, named after Wei-Liang Chow, is one of the foundational results in algebraic geometry. It roughly says that a proper morphism is fairly close to being a projective morphism. More precisely, a version of it states the following:[1]
- If
is a scheme that is proper over a noetherian base
, then there exists a projective
-scheme
and a surjective
-morphism
that induces an isomorphism
for some dense open
.
Proof
The proof here is a standard one (cf. EGA II, 5.6.1).
It is easy to reduce to the case when is irreducible, as follows.
is noetherian since it is of finite type over a noetherian base. Then it's also topologically noetherian, and consists of a finite number of irreducible components
, which are each proper over
(because they're closed immersions in the scheme
which is proper over
). If, within each of these irreducible components, there exists a dense open
, then we can take
. It is not hard to see that each of the disjoint pieces are dense in their respective
, so the full set
is dense in
. In addition, it's clear that we can similarly find a morphism
which satisfies the density condition.
Having reduced the problem, we now assume is irreducible. We recall that it must also be noetherian. Thus, we can find a finite open affine cover
.
are quasi-projective over
; there are open immersions over
,
into some projective
-schemes
. Put
.
is nonempty since
is irreducible. Let
be given by 's restricted to
over
.
Let
be given by and
over
.
is then an immersion; thus, it factors as an open immersion followed by a closed immersion
. Let
be the immersion followed by the projection. We claim
induces
; for that, it is enough to show
. But this means that
is closed in
.
factorizes as
.
is separated over
and so the graph morphism
is a closed immersion. This proves our contention.
It remains to show is projective over
. Let
be the closed immersion followed by the projection. Showing that
is a closed immersion shows
is projective over
. This can be checked locally. Identifying
with its image in
we suppress
from our notation.
Let where
. We claim
are an open cover of
. This would follow from
as sets. This in turn follows from
on
as functions on the underlying topological space. Since
is separated over
and
is dense, this is clear from looking at the relevant commutative diagram. Now,
is closed since it is a base extension of the proper morphism
. Thus,
is a closed subscheme covered by
, and so it is enough to show that for each
the map
, denoted by
, is a closed immersion.
Fix . Let
be the graph of
. It is a closed subscheme of
since
is separated over
. Let
be the projections. We claim that
factors through
, which would imply
is a closed immersion. But for
we have:
The last equality holds and thus there is that satisfies the first equality. This proves our claim.
Additional statements
In the statement of Chow's lemma, if is reduced, irreducible, or integral, we can assume that the same holds for
. If both
and
are irreducible, then
is a birational morphism. (cf. EGA II, 5.6).
References
- ↑ Hartshorne, Ch II. Exercise 4.10
- Grothendieck, Alexandre; Dieudonné, Jean (1961). "Éléments de géométrie algébrique: II. Étude globale élémentaire de quelques classes de morphismes" Check
value (help). Publications Mathématiques de l'IHÉS 8. doi:10.1007/bf02699291. MR 0217084.|url=
- Hartshorne, Robin (1977), Algebraic Geometry, Graduate Texts in Mathematics 52, New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-0-387-90244-9, MR 0463157