Saifullah Paracha v. George W. Bush

Saifullah Paracha v. George W. Bush (Civil Action No. 04-cv-02022) is a habeas corpus petition filed on behalf of Guantanamo detainee Saifullah Paracha.[1]

His lawyers include Gaillard T. Hunt.[2]

His case was presented to US District Court judge Paul L. Friedman.[3]

On 21 December 2004, the Department of Defense published fifty-eight pages of unclassified documents related to his Combatant Status Review Tribunal. The documents included many character references, including one from his American partner, a Jewish man, who assured his Tribunal that he was held Judaism and the USA in high regard.

Military Commissions Act

The Military Commissions Act of 2006 mandated that Guantanamo captives were no longer entitled to access the US civil justice system, so all outstanding habeas corpus petitions were stayed.[4]

Boumediene v. Bush

On June 12, 2008 the United States Supreme Court ruled, in Boumediene v. Bush, that the Military Commissions Act could not remove the right for Guantanamo captives to access the US Federal Court system. And all previous Guantanamo captives' habeas petitions were eligible to be re-instated.

Re-initiation

Saifullah Paracha's habeas was re-filed on July 5, 2008.[5]

On 15 July 2008 Kristine A. Huskey filed a "notice of petitioners' request for 30 days' notice of transfer" on behalf of Paracha and several dozen other captives.[6] The petition would prevent the Department of Defense from transferring him out of US jurisdiction without giving his attorney's thirty days' notice. The Department of Defense had transferred some captives to countries where they were subsequently subjected to abusive treatment—even though they had active habeas corpus petitions.

On 21 July 2008 DoJ official Paul A. Dean challenged Paracha's attorneys' request for discovery.[7] Dean argued that, due to time constraints: "respondents respectfully submit that the discovery relief requested by petitioner is not appropriate at this time."

On 27 September 2008 Zachary Katznelson and Cori Crider of Reprieve filed a "notice of authorization" on behalf of Saifullah Paracha.[8] The document states: "Pursuant to Judge Hogan’s July 29, 2008 Order, counsel for Petitioner Saifullah Paracha respectfully submit the attached document authorizing counsel to pursue this action. See Exhibit A."—but no attachment was published.

On 23 October 2008 Gaillard T. Hunt opposed the governments's motion to dismiss improper respondents.[9] Paracha's petition, like many others, named several other officials in addition to President Bush. The Department of Justice moved to have all the other respondents struck from the petition.

On 31 October On 2008 DoJ official Kathryn C. Mason filed a reply memorandum to the DoJ's motion to dismiss improper respondents for this petition, and fourteen other petitions.[10] Mason wrote:

Petitioner Paracha (No. 04-cv-2022) argues that Respondents have waived any objections to the naming of the respondents in his petition, because Respondents did not challenge service of process or this Court’s jurisdiction over the named respondents via a Rule 12(b) motion. Paracha Opp., 08-mc-442 Dkt#790, p. 4. However, Petitioner’s argument is misplaced. Respondents are not challenging in this motion service of process or personal jurisdiction with respect to these improper respondents. Rather, the basis of Respondents’ motion is a challenge to the propriety of naming these respondents in Petitioners’ habeas claim. This challenge is not waived pursuant to Fed. R.Civ. Proc. 12(h)(1), as Petitioner contends, even if that Rule applied here,13 and can be brought at this time.

On 18 November 2008 DoJ official David H. White filed a "statement of legal justification for detention" for this petition, and for 54 other petitions.[11]

References

  1. ↑ "Saifullah Paracha v. George W. Bush 04-CV-2022 (PLF)" (PDF). United States Department of Defense. 8 December 2004. pp. pages 1–58. Retrieved 2008-06-10.
  2. ↑ "Exhibit B: List Of Enemy Combatant Detainees With Pending Habeas Corpus Petitions Who Have Been Released From United States Custody" (PDF). United States Department of Justice. April 17, 2007. Retrieved 2008-05-05.
  3. ↑ "Lead Petitioners' Counsel in Guantanamo Habeas Cases" (PDF). Center for Constitutional Rights. January 8, 2007. Retrieved 2008-06-11.
  4. ↑ Peter D. Keisler, Douglas N. Letter (2006-10-16). "NOTICE OF MILITARY COMMISSIONS ACT OF 2006" (PDF). United States Department of Justice. Retrieved 2008-09-30. mirror
  5. ↑ Gaillard Hunt (2008-07-05). "MOTION TO VACATE ORDERS STAYING ACTION AND DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR DISCOVERY, AND FOR AN ORDER REQUIRING RESPONDENTS TO COMPLY WITH PETITIONER’S DISCOVERY REQUESTS" (PDF). Retrieved 2008-08-13.
  6. ↑ Kristine A. Huskey (2008-07-15). "Guantanamo Bay Detainee Litigation: Doc 63 -- NOTICE OF PETITIONERS’ REQUEST FOR 30-DAYS NOTICE OF TRANSFER" (PDF). United States Department of Justice. Retrieved 2008-11-13. mirror
  7. ↑ Paul A. Dean (2008-07-21). "Guantanamo Bay Detainee Litigation: Doc 168 -- RESPONDENTS’ RESPONSE TO PETITIONER’S MOTION TO VACATE ORDERS STAYING ACTION AND DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR DISCOVERY, AND FOR AN ORDER REQUIRING RESPONDENTS TO COMPLY WITH PETITIONER’S DISCOVERY REQUESTS" (PDF). United States Department of Justice. Retrieved 2008-12-30.
  8. ↑ Zachary Katznelson. Cori Crider (2008-09-27). "Guantanamo Bay Detainee Litigation: Doc 542 -- NOTICE OF AUTHORIZATION BY PETITIONER SAIFULLAH PARACHA TO PURSUE THIS ACTION" (PDF). United States Department of Justice. Retrieved 2008-09-30. mirror
  9. ↑ Gaillard T. Hunt (2008-10-23). "Guantanamo Bay Detainee Litigation: Doc 790 -- OPPOSITION TO "RESPONDENTS' MOTION TO DISMISS IMPROPER RESPONDENTS"" (PDF). United States Department of Justice. Retrieved 2008-12-30.
  10. ↑ Kathryn C. Mason (2008-10-31). "Guantanamo Bay Detainee Litigation: Doc 907 -- RESPONDENTS’ REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS IMPROPER RESPONDENTS" (PDF). United States Department of Justice. Retrieved 2008-12-30.
  11. ↑ David H. White (2008-11-18). "Guantanamo Bay Detainee Litigation: Doc 1006 -- RESPONDENTS’ STATEMENT OF LEGAL JUSTIFICATION FOR DETENTION" (PDF). United States Department of Justice. Retrieved 2008-12-16.
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Sunday, October 25, 2015. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.