Claymoor (Mișu Văcărescu)

Claymoor

Caricature of Claymoor by Nicolae Petrescu Găină
Born Mișu (Mihai Ion) Văcărescu
1842 or 1843
Died June 12, 1903(1903-06-12) (aged 60–61)
Bucharest
Occupation journalist, army officer
Nationality Wallachian
Romanian
Period 1873–1903
Genre fashion journalism, gossip column, theater criticism, film criticism

Mișu or Mihail Ion Văcărescu (Francized Michel Vacaresco; 1842 or 1843 – June 12, 1903), most commonly known as Claymoor, was a Wallachian-born Romanian fashion journalist and gossip columnist, the son of poet Iancu Văcărescu. A retired cavalry officer in the Romanian Land Forces, he began writing in his late twenties or early thirties, reaching his fame as a contributor to the Francophone daily L'Indépendence Roumaine. He was widely respected for his verdicts on fashion, and, as an arbiter of taste, contributed to his paper's renown; however, people of his day also ridiculed him for his florid literary style and his apparent homosexuality.

Claymoor's period of prominence, at the height of the Belle Époque, ended with his sudden death. By that time, he had also left a mark as one of Romania's first film critics. Although his almanac was still published, he himself was largely forgotten in the Kingdom of Romania by the end of World War I. Traces of his memory are preserved in disguised portrayals and parodies by writers such as Ion Luca Caragiale and Petru Dumitriu.

Biography

Early life and debut

Văcărescu's exact birth date remains unknown.[1][2] However, he died at the age of 60[3] or 61,[4] meaning that he was born in 1842 or 1843. It also certain that he was of aristocratic upbringing, from the Văcărescu family of boyars, and directly related to other prominent families of Wallachia; unlike them, he had inherited litte wealth.[5] Mihail was the son of the more famous Wallachian poet Iancu (Ioan) Văcărescu, which made him the grandson of Alecu and the grandnephew of Ienăchiță Văcărescu.[3] His sister was Eufrosina m. Fălcoianu, which made Claymoor the uncle of Elena Văcărescu.[6] His cousins included Theodor C. Văcărescu, the diplomat.[5]

A graduate of Lycée Henri-IV in Paris, Văcărescu always endured as a "great friend of France", according to his colleagues at Le Figaro.[4] His first calling was the army, and he reached an Captain's rank[7] in the cavalry corps, later retiring to take up work for the Bucharest daily press.[8] According to several accounts, he was by then openly gay, or, as historian Ion Bulei writes, "a notorious pederast".[5] Writer-diplomat Gheorghe Crutzescu also notes that Claymoor "did not quite like women", although he was particularly fond of cross-dressing acts such as La Belle Otero and the Barrison Sisters.[9] Around 1890, he was involved in a legal conflict with a Major Baldovici, and rumor spread in the rival press that he had tried to seduce him and other army subordinates.[7] However, Bacalbașa disputes such "mean-spirited" rumors as "fables".[10]

Văcărescu's first experience with Francophone journalism was at La Roumanie daily (1873–1876), where he used the pen name Velréas.[2] He later had a stint at the left-wing paper Românul (1877–1879), where he began using his consecrated pen name.[2] As Claymoor, he began his activity at L'Indépendence Roumaine in 1879[5][6] or 1880,[2] taking over for the Frenchman Ulysse de Marsillac.[11] Simultaneously, as Babylas, he was writing for La Roumanie Ilustrée.[12] His regular chronicle was the Carnet du High-life, which later spawned an Almanach du High-Life.[3] Claymoor's first almanac had been La Vie à Bucarest 1882–1883 ("Life in Bucharest 1882–1883"), published with Theil & Weiss company,[1] followed by La Lanterne Mondaine ("Worldly Lantern") in 1884.[2] These early chronicles coincided with the introduction of electric lighting, which, from ca. 1882, allowed open-air night parties to become fashionable.[13]

Claymoor soon became one of the regulars at the journalists' hangout, Casa Capșa, frequenting a society that also included Nicolae Filipescu and N. T. Orășanu.[14] Bacalbașa recalls him as "perfectly collegial". However, he also writes that Claymoor, "a very decent man", "was a journalist, but by no means was he one of the journalistic world; he lived inside the boyar society that had spawned and raised him".[10] More controversially, from 1888, when he became a Romanian delegate to the Paris World Fair,[15] Claymoor was depicted as a political client of the ruling Conservative Party.[16]

Arbiter of fashion

Writer George Costescu describes L'Indépendence Roumaine as adhering to "Western journalistic norms", and notes Claymoor's role in pioneering locally the genre of "fashion reports": "the crafty Mihail Văcărescu-Claymoor chronicled all the political and diplomatic receptions, all artistic reunions and balls, concerts, fêtes and weddings involving Bucharest's elite families."[17] Similarly, Bulei sees the Carnet as copying from Le Figaro and Le Gaulois, "but with its Dâmbovița relish." He suggests that some of the chronicles—for instance one describing Zoe Sturdza, wife of the politician D. A. Sturdza—were unintentionally amusing.[5]

Early reviewers were similarly inclined. In 1890, Amiculu Familiei newspaper described Claymoor as "a sad figure in [Romanian] journalism". It deplored the Frenchified culture which had produced Claymoor, but also noted that his metaphorical style was being laughed at by the Belgian paper La Réforme.[18] Yet, as noted by memoirist Constantin Bacalbașa, Claymoor's writings made him "a tiny celebrity": "for 24 years Bucharest has had its Claymoor epoch."[8] According to the same source, Claymoor could describe "wonderfully and competently the ladies' full attire at the various soirées that he attended. Some claimed that [Claymoor] was being paid by luxury seamstresses, but this was never proven true."[10] According to Crutzescu: "not being cited by Claymoor [...] was a catastrophe, an insult that equated social death. Which is why Claymoor's home was always full of diverse gifts, from ladies who wished not to be forgotten, or overlooked."[19] Văcărescu's recommendations were such "that all fashionable society would adopt both the seamstress and the attire."[10]

Claymoor in drag, as pictured in 1898 by Constantin Jiquidi.

At times, his contributions doubled as theater criticism, such as when, in 1884, he chronicled O scrisoare pierdută, by the Romanian classic Ion Luca Caragiale. His overall negative judgment of the play was itself judged negatively by later critics.[20] He was repeatedly included in retrospectives as one of Caragiale's detractors.[20][21] Claymoor earned more respect as a pioneer cinema critic: in 1896–1897, he was among the first to chronicle the earliest Romanian film shows and, as film historian Dinu-Ioan Nicola argues, had "surprising critical intuitions."[22] Having been present at a screening of Paul Menu's "Romanian vistas" in May 1897, Claymoor prophesied that "cinema will reestablish truth and the sincerity of our lives will be transmitted over the ages, beyond ourselves. To us it is entertainment. To future generations, it will be a priceless document".[23]

Having contributed directly to L'Indépendence Roumaine's success (it became the second-most popular newspaper by 1897),[24] Claymoor made a return trip to Paris in 1899.[4] He died in Bucharest on June 12, 1903, after falling down in front of L'Indépendence Roumaine office, just as he was bringing in his latest Carnet chronicle. Although he is sometimes assumed to have died there, on the spot,[5] he actually did so at the home of his sister Eufrosina.[6] Claymoor was buried at Bellu cemetery, Plot 17.[25] The Almanach du High-Life continued to be published over the following years.[3]

Legacy

By the 1920s, Bacalbașa claims, "nobody so much as remember[ed] this [...] arbiter of female elegance".[10] Crutzescu also noted in passing that Claymoor's writing style was antiquated, "so very obnoxious".[9] His "yellowing notebooks", Crutzescu writes, revealed a world "of bearded and mustachioed gents and ladies with malakoffs that, when stirred, will rustle the way dead leaves do."[26] Nevertheless, Claymoor endured as the hero of "so many anecdotes" relating to his lifestyle and his alleged vanities. By the end of his life, he was completely bald, but was hiding it. One such story claims that he lost his wig while bathing on the Romanian littoral and went chasing for his wig in the water.[10] Claymoor's likeness is also preserved in the work of various cartoonists, including his Capșa colleague Constantin Jiquidi, who drew him doing drag.[27]

From the beginning of his career in journalism, Claymoor's style irritated more senior writers. In 1883, Ion Ghica and Dimitrie C. Ollănescu-Ascanio had sketched out a comedy of mores, which, if finalized, was to feature a leading character based on Claymoor.[28] Anton Bacalbașa also refers to Claymoor as the favorite writer of Moș Teacă's ignorant wife, and gives him a brief role in one of his sketches (where Claymoore's homosexuality is again hinted at).[29]

Claymoor is more famous as the target of satires by Caragiale, in his Momente și schițe series—one of his favorite techniques here was to pastiche Claymoor's "pirouettes-and-colored-ribbons" prose.[30] Caragiale's sketch "High-life", first published on Christmas Eve 1899,[3][31] is entirely dedicated to Claymoor, who appears as "Edgar Bostandaki" or "Turturel" ("Turtledove"), chronicler for the fictional Voice of the Aurochs. A licentious typo subverts his description of a high-society dame as an "indefatigable sylphid", and he has to deal with her husband's wrath (readers were left unsure as to what the hinted typo was).[3][31]

There are other supposed echoes of Claymoor in Romanian prose. Author Radu Cernătescu claims that Claymoor is the character "Poponel", appearing in Craii de Curtea-Veche—a 1929 novel by Mateiu Caragiale (son of Ion Luca).[32] This contradicts other accounts, according to which "Poponel" is based on another Romanian aristocrat, who was still alive in 1936.[33] At a later stage, Petru Dumitriu referred to Claymoor (as "Michel Ipsilanti-Seymour"), and to the Bostandaki–typo sketch, in his own novel, Family Chronicle.[31][34]

Notes

  1. 1 2 Lucreția Angheluță, Salomeea Rotaru, Liana Miclescu, Marilena Apostolescu, Marina Vazaca, Bibliografia românească modernă (1831–1918). Vol. IV: R–Z, p. 722. Bucharest: Editura științifică și enciclopedică, 1996. ISBN 973-27-0501-9
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 Mihail Straje, Dicționar de pseudonime, anonime, anagrame, astronime, criptonime ale scriitorilor și publiciștilor români, p. 768. Bucharest: Editura Minerva, 1973. OCLC 8994172
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 (Romanian) Ioana Pârvulescu, "O adresă high-life", in România Literară, Nr. 25/2010
  4. 1 2 3 Ferrari, "Le Monde & La Ville. Renseignements mondains", in Le Figaro, July 26, 1899, p. 2
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 (Romanian) Ion Bulei, "În epoca lui Claymoor", in Ziarul Financiar, October 18, 2002
  6. 1 2 3 Ferrari, "Le Monde & La Ville. Deuil", in Le Figaro, June 28, 1903, p. 2
  7. 1 2 "Svonuri", in Voința Națională, January 5 (17), 1891, p. 2
  8. 1 2 Bacalbașa, pp. 60–61
  9. 1 2 Crutzescu, p. 118
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Bacalbașa, p. 61
  11. ↑ Crutzescu, p. 135
  12. ↑ George Potra, Din Bucureștii de altădată, p. 244. Bucharest: Editura științifică și enciclopedică, 1981
  13. ↑ Crutzescu, p. 38
  14. ↑ Costescu, p. 378. See also Crutzescu, p. 119
  15. ↑ Georges Bibesco, Exposition universelle 1889. La Roumanie avant-pendant-après, p. 366. Paris: Imprimerie Typographique J. Kugelmann, 1890
  16. ↑ "O rușine națională", in Voința Națională, December 20, 1888 (January 1, 1889), p. 1
  17. ↑ Costescu, p. 238
  18. ↑ A. C. Șor., "Din viéța de Bucureșcĭ", in Amiculu Familiei, Nr. 15/1890, pp. 218–219
  19. ↑ Crutzescu, p. 119
  20. 1 2 Mihai Florea, "Este nouă noua ediție Caragiale?", in Teatrul, Nr. 10/1959, p. 20
  21. ↑ Dan C. Mihăilescu, "Unde îi sunt detractorii?", in Biblioteca Bucureștilor, Nr. 7/2002, p. 5
  22. ↑ (French) Dinu-Ioan Nicola, "Sur les traces du film roumain muet", in Journal of Film Preservation, Vol. XXVI, N° 54, April 1997, p. 44
  23. ↑ (Romanian) Manuela Cernat, "Cinematograful în istorie (I)", in Studii și Cercetări de Istoria Artei. Teatru, Muzică, Cinematografie, Issues 5–6 (49–50), 2011–2012, p. 7
  24. ↑ (Romanian) Emanuel Bădescu, "Duelul Emanoil Lahovary–Nicolae Filipescu", in Ziarul Financiar, July 2, 2015
  25. ↑ Gheorghe G. Bezviconi, Necropola Capitalei, p. 277. Bucharest: Nicolae Iorga Institute of History, 1972; Crutzescu, p. 259
  26. ↑ Crutzescu, p. 151
  27. ↑ Costescu, p. 378 and Plate II, pp. 328–329; Traian Demetrescu, Profile literare, p. 49. Craiova: Editura Tipografiei D. I. Benvenisti, 1891
  28. ↑ Șerban Cioculescu, "Ion Ghica", in Șerban Cioculescu, Ovidiu Papadima, Alexandru Piru (eds.), Istoria literaturii române. III: Epoca marilor clasici, pp. 438–439. Bucharest: Editura Academiei, 1973
  29. ↑ Anton Bacalbașa, "Moș Teacă și Mealy. La teatrul liric", in Adevărul, October 18, 1893, p. 3
  30. ↑ Silvian Iosifescu, "I. L. Caragiale", in Șerban Cioculescu, Ovidiu Papadima, Alexandru Piru (eds.), Istoria literaturii române. III: Epoca marilor clasici, p. 343. Bucharest: Editura Academiei, 1973
  31. 1 2 3 (Romanian) Mihai Iovănel, "O îngrozitoare greșală de tipar", in Cultura, Nr. 298, November 2010
  32. ↑ (Romanian) Cosmin Ciotloș, "Cum grano salis", in România Literară, Nr. 44/2010
  33. ↑ Șerban Cioculescu, Caragialiana, p. 351. Bucharest: Editura Eminescu, 1974. OCLC 6890267
  34. ↑ (Romanian) Ion Vartic, "Un veac de singurătate boierească", in Apostrof, Nr. 10/1009

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Wednesday, May 04, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.