Coherence (film)

Coherence

Theatrical release poster
Directed by James Ward Byrkit
Written by James Ward Byrkit
Story by
  • James Ward Byrkit
  • Alex Manugian
Starring
Music by Kristin Øhrn Dyrud
Cinematography Nic Sadler
Edited by Lance Pereira
Production
company
  • Bellanova Films
  • Ugly Duckling Films
Distributed by
Release dates
  • September 19, 2013 (2013-09-19) (Austin Fantastic Fest)
Running time
 88 minutes[1]
Country
  • United States
Language English
Budget $50,000
Box office $102,617[2]

Coherence is an American science fiction thriller film directed by James Ward Byrkit in his directorial debut.[3] The film had its world debut on September 19, 2013 at the Austin Fantastic Fest and stars Emily Baldoni as a woman who must deal with strange occurrences following a comet sighting.[4]

Plot

We begin by following our focal character, Em, on her way to a dinner party at the house of her friends, married couple Mike and Lee. Once at the house she helps them prepare for the dinner, together with Beth, their mutual friend. Whilst preparing the food they discuss one another's lives, among other topics, and Em shows Beth, Mike and Lee that her mobile phone cracked whilst she was using it in the car on the way over. She mentions that this could be because of a comet that is passing close by the Earth that evening, as reported in the news. As the remaining guests arrive, Kevin, Hugh (Beth's husband), and newly together couple Amir and Laurie (an ex of Kevin's), they casually discuss the comet and its supposed effects. Just like with Em's phone the screen on Hugh's phone has also cracked and he shows this to the others. He too mentions the comet and that his brother, who has a keen interest in Quantum Physics, has told him that the comet could have some strange effects on the planet whilst it passes. This is later expanded on during the dinner discussion by Em, who tells two stories about strange phenomena recorded after astral bodies came in close proximity to the Earth - one in Finland in 1923 when another comet passed, and an earlier meteor explosion over Russia in 1908. Laurie, who is meeting some of the guests for the first time, asks Mike what he does for a living. He explains that he is an actor who played a main character on a hit sci-fi TV show for many years. Laurie who is a huge fan of the show tells everyone that she doesn't recognise him. He makes a joke of this as do the others. We continue to learn details about the past and current lives of the others in the group through their conversations with Laurie and between themselves, including that Em should be a successful, famous dancer but for one indecisive moment in her life which resulted in another dancer 'living her life'.

During dinner a blackout occurs. Mike provides glow sticks as a temporary external light source, and Hugh and Amir after looking outside and spotting lights on in a house a few blocks away, decide to go to this house and ask if they have a working telephone, so that Hugh can call his brother. After power is restored, Hugh and Amir return. Hugh has an injury to his face and Amir has brought back a mysterious box that he found at the other house. When the others finally manage to get an explanation out of a shocked Hugh as to what happened, he tells them that when he looked in the window of the other house he saw it was set up for dinner exactly like theirs is. The others react with scorn and disbelief. Piqued with curiosity and in search of answers they decide to open the box. Inside they find a ping pong paddle and a photo of each of them with a number written on the back. Em tells Kevin that she recognises the handwriting on the pictures as hers, and Amir tells the group that the photo must have been taken of him that evening as in it he is wearing a sweater that he bought that day.

After much discussion about what to do, Mike, Laurie, Em and Kevin decide to go to the other house. When Mike sees the house he realises that it looks exactly like his house and he looks through the window. When they hear someone coming they head back to their house. In the street they encounter a group of people who look exactly like them, the only difference being the colour of the glow sticks they are holding. After a few seconds both groups panic and bolt back to their respective houses.

Back inside Beth remembers a quantum physics book that is in Hugh's car, that his brother lent to him. This book could help explain what is happening to them. Hugh retrieves the book and reads to the others the coherence theory many-worlds interpretation of quantum physics. The group decides from this information that the comet has opened up a door to a different reality, and that this de-coherence of reality will collapse back to one single reality after the comet has passed.

After further discussion they realize that owing to noticeable time delays in their actions being carried out by their other selves, that it is possible that the other versions of them haven't remembered the book or be aware of what is happening. They decide that it would be a good idea to steal the book in order to prevent their other selves from discovering this de-coherence in reality. Meanwhile, Mike, who we now discover has issues with alcohol and who has started drinking to help him cope with the collapse of what he understands to be reality, decides his best course of action is to blackmail his other self into keeping the other group from reading the book. He tells Kevin this who advises him not to, but he writes himself a threatening note anyway and whilst the others are busy he leaves the house. Whilst he is gone, the conversation continues and, discrepancies in details of things that happened during the evening are highlighted. The realisations of this result in Amir and Hugh leaving the house again, however, they soon return.

The group decides to create a means to identify themselves and the house they are in as belonging to them and their own reality. They decide to find a box and put into it a photo of each of them with a randomly generated number on the back together with a key object. Em collates the photos and writes the assigned random numbers on each one and in a list on a note pad. The objects are then put into the box. It is closed and left outside the house for them to use as their marker.

As Em is the only one with all the marker information she soon realises that the people coming into and leaving the house are not the original or even the alternate version others who she thought had been entering and leaving, and that because of this there must be more than two realities co-existing. More discussion identifies the existence of a "dark zone" outside in the street, which they have all passed through when going to the other house or to their cars. Em theorises that this dark zone must act as some kind of multiple access point to many alternate realities and that anyone who enters it exits into one of these realities at random. This means that anyone who enters has no way of knowing if they have returned, or ever will return, to the same reality that they just left. This theory is seemingly backed up by the groups apparent amnesia about events or actions they have decided to take or that have already happened during the evening. Em herself tests this theory on Kevin when she retrieves a ring that in her reality he bought her. She shows it to him and he recognizes it. She shows it to him again later after one of them has left and re-entered the house and he doesn't.

The group is then disturbed by the arrival of Mike's note to himself. Hugh reads it and discovers that it refers to an infidelity between his wife Beth and Mike. He attacks Mike and it is at this point that 'reality' breaks down and descends into chaos. We follow Em as she leaves the house and crosses through the dark zone. We see her going to multiple realities where she observes how their other selves are coping in this situation and if they are even aware of it.

In one reality where the group has no idea of the situation (and in which she and Kevin are a couple and she is a successful dancer), she decides to take action. She lures her other self outside, and after attacking her and hiding her body in the trunk of her car she takes her place. With this group she goes outside to watch the comet and it breaks up as it passes the planet signifying that this strange astral event is ending.

Walking through the house Em discovers another Em who is vulnerable and clearly in distress. Panicked that the others will see both of her, she drags her other self into the bathroom, knocks her unconscious and hides her in the bath. As she calms down and composes herself before leaving the bathroom and returning to the others, she checks to make sure she is wearing her ring. We see she is; however, we also see it on the bathroom floor. She then returns to the others in the living room where she promptly collapses.

Em awakes the next morning to find herself on the couch in the living room. She gets up and wanders through the house and finds everything in order and everyone in good spirits. She goes outside and finds Kevin who tells her that they were worried about her because of her collapse last night. Whilst they are talking his phone rings. He answers noting that it's weird because it's her calling him, and the film ends with them looking suspiciously at each other.

Cast

Production

Development

Byrkit came up with the idea for Coherence after deciding that he wanted to test the idea of shooting a film "without a crew and without a script".[5] He chose to shoot in his own home and developed the film's science fiction aspect out of necessity, as he wanted to "make a living room feel bigger than just a living room".[5] While Byrkit did have a specific idea for how the film would unfold, he selected improvisational actors and gave them the basic outline of their characters, motivations, and major plot points.[6]

Byrkit told an interviewer, "For about a year, all I did was make charts and maps and drew diagrams of houses, arrows pointing where everyone was going, trying to keep track of different iterations. Months and months of tracking fractured realities, looking up what actual scientists believe about the nature of reality — Schrödinger's cat and all that. It was research, but despite all the graphs and charts, I think our whole idea was that it has to be character-based. We want the logic of our internal rules to be sound, and we wanted it to be something people could watch 12 times and still discover a new layer."[7]

Casting

Byrkit intentionally chose actors who did not know each other. He told an interviewer that, after working on blockbuster films (such as Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl), "I come from theater where I was trained to really just concentrate on story and character on a stage with actors and so I was craving getting rid of everything, getting rid of the crew; getting rid of script, no special effects, no support, no money, no nothing, and just getting back to the purity of that, of a camera in your hand and some actress (actors?) that you trust and an idea."[8]

Byrkit added,

"...instead of having a script, each actor was given a page of notes each day with their back story or sort of motivation for the night. But they wouldn't know what the other actors had received so it had a very natural, very spontaneous collision of motivations that ended up being what you see on film; obviously guided by a very strict outline that we have been working on for about a year that tracked all the clues and the puzzles and all the rehearsals and things like that. But the actors weren't aware of those, those things happened because we were sort of guiding them through it."

When asked whether the actors were people whom Byrkit knew pretty well, he answered, "Yeah exactly. They were just friends that I knew I could just call up and say, 'Show up at my house in a couple days. I can't really tell you what we're doing, trust me I'm not going to kill you. It should be fun!' And they didn't know each other before they got to my house and so I had to pick people that seemed to be like they could be couples, seemed like they could be best friends and that I just knew were up to the task of jumping into it."[8]

Interviewer Nell Minow confessed her reaction to the actors' relationships: "I just assumed that they all knew each other very well because they fell into the kinds of rhythms that old friends have." Byrkit replied, "That's just casting great people that could do that. Just five minutes after they arrived at my house they had to pretend to be married and lovers and best friends."[8]

Reviewer Matt Prigge praised the choice of casting and their actions: "Byrkit ... focuses not on brainiacs, as in Primer, but on smart but mostly under-informed NPR types, who know enough to slowly piece all this together but not enough that they don't usually descend into blabbering, shouting and drinking. Indeed, Coherence is largely improvised, with a game cast first believably under-reacting to some weird business with laughter and disbelief, then always maintaining a degree of levity (read: jokes and occasional put-downs) even when stuff has gotten real."[9]

Writing

Ryan Lattanzio wrote, "Byrkit brought eight unwitting actors to his Santa Monica home, threw them a few red herrings and set them loose for five days knowing that the film could evolve organically, like great jazz, if he kept his players in the dark. But he and co-storywriter Alex Manugian weren't just making it up as they went along." Byrkit told him that his desire was "to strip down a film set to the bare minimum: getting rid of the script, getting rid of the crew."

Byrkit added, "...instead of a script I had my own 12-page treatment that I spent about a year working on. It outlined all of the twists, and reveals, and character arcs and pieces of the puzzle that needed to happen scene-by-scene. But each day, instead of getting a script, the actors would get a page of notes for their individual character, whether it was a backstory or information about their motivations. They would come prepared for their character only. They had no idea what the other characters received, so each night there were completely real reactions, and surprises and responses. This was all in the pursuit of naturalistic performances. The goal was to get them listening to each other, and engaged in the mystery of it all."[10]

Actor Brendon discussed the improvisational style of the dialogue with CraveOnline journalist Fred Topel, who asked: "I understand the way Coherence was done was that everyone got notecards about their characters and the scenes. What was on your notecards?"

Brendon replied, "I can't remember now, but every day we had five different things that we had to convey... but I do know that Jim [Byrkit], and then Alex [Manugian], the other writer, had to make sure that we were all on point. So it was just a matter of getting that information out. ... Since there was no script, I had no idea how it ended. ... When I saw the movie, I'm like, 'Oh shit, this is awesome!' ... To be quite honest with you, I never really knew what was going on fully until I saw the movie done."[11]

Filming

Principal photography took place over the course of five nights in Byrkit's house.[7]

An interviewer asked Byrkit, "Did you run into any unexpected problems in filming?"

Byrkit admitted, "... you're constantly dealing with unexpected things. One night we tried to shoot outside and we had to make the whole thing look completely desolate and the power being off; that was the one night that we had another movie shooting on our street. So the whole street is completely ablaze with lights and hundreds of extras." Another team was shooting a Snickers commercial. "We would be right in the middle of the dramatic scenes and there would be another knock on the door that would just scare the hell out of everybody..."[8]

Inspirations and themes

Byrkit told an interviewer for Spinning Platters, "Well, we came up with the premise in my living room, where the movie is shot. A couple years ago we were trying to think about what a good low budget, or no budget, movie would be. And, since we didn't have any resources, I had to think of what we actually had. We had a camera. We had some actors who were pretty good, and we had a living room. So we had to find out how to make a living room feel like more than just a living room. And, that led to a whole Twilight Zone type story... I was craving a more naturalistic type of dialogue, where people overlap and it's very messy, where people talk more like real humans talk. And so, we planned the story for a year, including the twists and turns and reversals and betrayals so that we had a really tight puzzle – almost like a fun house that we knew we could lead the actors through."[12]

Some reviewers have suggested that Byrkit was influenced by the eeriness of The Twilight Zone and/or the mind-challenging complexities of the science fiction film Primer.[7][9][13][14][15]

Byrkit answered one interviewer: "Twilight Zone, for sure. Primer wasn't really an influence so much as it was a sign to us that maybe there was an audience for this kind of movie. The actual movie itself is so different than ours that it wasn't as much of an influence as, say, Carnage by Roman Polanski, or other non-sci-fi movies."[7]

Reception

Critical reception for Coherence has been predominantly positive and the film currently holds a rating of 88% on Rotten Tomatoes, based on 74 reviews.[16][17]

Much of the film's praise centered upon its cast, which Bloody Disgusting and Fangoria cited as a highlight.[18][19] Film School Rejects gave Coherence a positive review, stating that the film's cast was "remarkably grounded for how complicated and bizarre the story is."[20]

Dread Central commented on the film's themes and wrote, "What's frightening about the story is how willing the characters are to abandon the reality they know in favor of one that may be a little more appealing. Whether that's a byproduct of the comet and the rift it creates or caused by the characters undermining everyone else around them to get the life they really want is the fundamental idea of Coherence and what makes it so unsettling."[21]

Clark Collis of Entertainment Weekly praised the film, granting it a B+ rating: "In an impressive big-screen debut from James Ward Byrkit, eight friends discover metaphysics on their menu when a passing comet creates a set of doppelgängers down the road, enjoying their own identical soiree. Byrkit makes the most of the claustrophobic one-house setting, ratcheting up the dread and paranoia as his characters make a string of seemingly reasonable but ultimately wrongheaded decisions. The star-free cast is great too, with Buffy the Vampire Slayer vet Nicholas Brendon poking fun at himself by playing an actor who used to be on a TV show... Coherence is a satisfying and chilling addition to the ever-growing pal-ocalypse subgenre. And really, you have to love a film that not only explains the concept of Schrödinger's cat but also includes a joke about it ("I'm allergic!").[22]

Stephen Dalton of The Hollywood Reporter also enjoyed the film: "An ingenious micro-budget science-fiction nerve-jangler which takes place entirely at a suburban dinner party, Coherence is a testament to the power of smart ideas and strong ensemble acting over expensive visual pyrotechnics... A group of eight friends gather for dinner... Marital tensions and sexual secrets sizzle just below the surface, but relationship drama is soon overshadowed by astrological weirdness when a comet passes close to Earth, shutting down power supplies and phone connections... It slowly becomes clear that the fabric of reality has been radically remixed by the comet's arrival. We are definitely not in Kansas any more... Byrkit only gave his cast limited information about the narrative loops and swerves ahead, encouraging a semi-improvised naturalism that feels authentically tense."[14]

Matt Zoller Seitz, editor-in-chief of Roger Ebert's website, gives the movie three gold stars and writes that the film "is proof that inventive filmmakers can do a lot with a little... [but] none of the movie's technical or artistic shortcomings prove to be deal breakers. Once Coherence delves into its premise, the viewer is bound to come down with a bad case of the creeps. This is a less-is-more science fiction-horror tale... And it's genuinely more of a horror film than a suspense or "terror" film because, while there's some violence, the source of unease is philosophical."[23]

Ryan Lattanzio of Indiewire praised the film's originality: "Coherence is not just smart science fiction: it's a triumph of crafty independent filmmaking, made with few resources and big ambition. Gotham-nominated debut director James Ward Byrkit stripped his vision down to the barest of bones to achieve a mind-shifting, metaphysical freakout about a dinner party gone cosmically awry. This film explodes with ideas, and it has that thing we always hope for at the movies: the element of surprise."[10]

The reviewer for Salon was ambivalent: "After the fundamental problem of Coherence has become clear, or clear-ish – there's another dinner party, at that other house, that looks an awful lot like this one – the movie becomes slightly too much like an unfolding mathematical puzzle, although an ingenious one that reaches a chilling conclusion. Notes appear before they are written, the significance of those numbered photographs comes into focus through a series of neat twists, and while the characters are half aware that their actions are being shaped by a space-time continuum whose cause-and-effect relationship has gone awry, that's not enough to stop them."[24]

Accolades

See also

References

  1. ↑ "COHERENCE (15)". British Board of Film Classification. January 26, 2015. Retrieved January 26, 2015.
  2. ↑ "Coherence (2014)". Box Office Mojo. Retrieved July 21, 2014.
  3. ↑ Wiseman, Andreas. "Independent to sell Coherence". Screen Daily. Retrieved 8 June 2014.
  4. ↑ Hunter, Rob. "‘Coherence’ Trailer Teases a Film That Engages Your Mind Before Bending It". FSR. Retrieved 8 June 2014.
  5. 1 2 Topel, Fred. "Fantastic Fest 2013: James Ward Byrkit & Emily Foxler on Coherence". CraveOnline. Retrieved 8 June 2014.
  6. ↑ Brown, Todd. "COHERENCE: Watch The Theatrical Trailer For James Ward Byrkit's Stellar Indie SciFi". Twitch Film. Retrieved 8 June 2014.
  7. 1 2 3 4 Tobias, Scott (June 26, 2014). "How James Ward Byrkit constructed Coherence". The Dissolve. Retrieved November 11, 2014.
  8. 1 2 3 4 Minow, Nell (2014). "Interview: James Ward Byrkit of Coherence". BeliefNet. Retrieved November 11, 2014.
  9. 1 2 Prigge, Matt (June 19, 2014). "Review: 'Coherence' is a mind-blower that's actually mind-blowing". Metro (Metro International). Retrieved November 11, 2014.
  10. 1 2 Lattanzio, Ryan (October 23, 2014). "How Gotham Nominee James Ward Byrkit Made Coherence in 5 Days with No Script or Budget". Thompson on Hollywood. Retrieved November 11, 2014.
  11. ↑ Topel, Fred (June 20, 2014). "Coherence: Nicholas Brendon on Schrodinger's Cat and Buffy". CraveOnline. Retrieved November 11, 2014.
  12. ↑ LIffmann, Chad (June 23, 2014). "Spinning Platters Interview: James Ward Byrkit, Writer/Director, Coherence". Spinning Platters. Retrieved November 11, 2014.
  13. ↑ Barone, Matt (June 20, 2014). "Permanent Midnight: On Coherence, a Must-See Twilight Zone Homage For the Bourgeoisie". Complex. Retrieved November 11, 2014.
  14. 1 2 Dalton, Stephen (2014-06-13). "Coherence: Film Review: Cosmic Catastrophe comes to Dinner in first-time director James Ward Byrkit's Smart, Spooky, Low-Budget Sci-Fi Shocker". The Hollywood Reporter. Retrieved June 16, 2014.
  15. ↑ Feldberg, Isaac (June 21, 2014). "Coherence Review". We Got This Covered. Retrieved November 11, 2014.
  16. ↑ Prime, Samuel B. "Fantastic Fest 2013: Coherence, Patrick, Why Don't You Play in Hell?, & The Congress". Slant Magazine. Retrieved 8 June 2014.
  17. ↑ "Coherence". Rotten Tomatoes. Retrieved 16 June 2015.
  18. ↑ Macomber, Shawn. "COHERENCE (Fantastic Fest Movie Review)". Fangoria. Retrieved 8 June 2014.
  19. ↑ Cooper, Patrick. "[Fantastic Fest '13 Review] Get Paranoid As Hell with the Twisty Sci-Fi Thriller Coherence". Bloody Disgusting. Retrieved 8 June 2014.
  20. ↑ Treveloni, Michael. "Fantastic Fest: Coherence is an Excellent, Comprehensible Mess". FSR. Retrieved 8 June 2014.
  21. ↑ Tinnin, Drew. "Coherence (review)". Dread Central. Retrieved 8 June 2014.
  22. ↑ Collis, Clark (June 12, 2014). "Coherence (2014)". Entertainment Weekly: 50.
  23. ↑ Seitz, Matt Zoller (June 20, 2014). "Coherence". www.rogerebert.com. Retrieved November 11, 2014.
  24. ↑ O'Hehir, Andrew (June 19, 2014). "Coherence puts a strange, sci-fi twist on the dinner party movie". Salon. Retrieved November 11, 2014.
  25. 1 2 "Coherence Trailer Introduces Psychological Puzzle". Bloody Disgusting. Retrieved 8 June 2014.
  26. ↑ "Sitges - 46ed. Festival Internacional de Catalunya (11/10 - 20/10)". Sitges Film Festival. Retrieved 8 June 2014.
  27. 1 2 "And the winners are...". IFF. Retrieved 8 June 2014.

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Monday, May 02, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.