Comcast Corp. v. Behrend
Comcast Corp. v. Behrend |
---|
|
Argued November 5, 2012 Decided March 27, 2013 |
---|
Full case name |
Comcast Corp. v. Behrend |
---|
Docket nos. |
11-864 |
---|
Prior history |
decision against defendant, 264 F.R.D. 150 (E.D. Pa. 2010); affirmed, 655 F.3d 182 (3d Cir. 2011); rehearing en banc denied, unreported; certiorari granted, 567 U. S. ___ (2012) |
---|
Holding |
---|
Respondents’ class action was improperly certified under Rule 23(b)(3). |
Court membership |
---|
|
Case opinions |
---|
Majority |
Scalia, joined by Roberts, Alito, Kennedy, Thomas |
---|
Dissent |
Ginsburg and Breyer, joined by Kagan, Sotomayor |
---|
Laws applied |
---|
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3) |
Comcast Corp. v. Behrend is a 2013 U.S. Supreme Court case dealing with class certification under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.[1] The case restricted class certifications. The votes were split upon typical ideological lines, but, in an unusual move, the dissent was jointly written by two justices.
References
- ↑ Comcast Cor. Et Al v. Behrend Et Al. Text
External links