Constantin Banu

Constantin Gheorghe Banu (March 20, 1873 – September 8, 1940) was a Romanian writer, journalist and politician, who served as Arts and Religious Affairs Minister in 1922–1923. He is remembered in literary history as the founder of Flacăra review, which he published in two editions, alongside Petre Locusteanu, Ion Pillat, Adrian Maniu, and, later, Vintilă Russu-Șirianu. A best-selling magazine for its time, it functioned as a launching pad for several writers of the Romanian Symbolist movement.

Banu was an affiliate and orator of the National Liberal Party, which he served continuously for 30 years, as a political journalist, public polemicist, and member of Parliament. His contribution as an essayist, lampoonist, and aphorist reflected his progressive approach to labor and productive life, his critique of conservatism, as well as his concept of civilized political mores.

Banu's career in politics reached the international level during World War I, when he took refuge from German-occupied Romania to campaign for the Romanian cause in Paris. Subsequently, during his term as minister, he focused on negotiating a Romanian Concordat and normalizing relations with the Catholic Church. In his final years in politics, he was an affiliate of the National Liberal Party-Brătianu. These activities, like much of his vast (but fragmentary) work in print, or his speeches, endured as the focus of political controversy.

Biography

Early years and political debut

Born in Bucharest,[1] his father was a Gheorghe N. Banu, and his mother a Smaranda (or Coralia) Banu.[2] French on his mother's side, and possibly descending from Romanian shepherds on his fathers',[3] Banu was baptized Romanian Orthodox.[4] He completed secondary education at Saint Sava National College, a classmate of writer Ioan A. Bassarabescu, actor Ion Livescu, and lawyer-politician Scarlat Orăscu. Influenced by their teacher, classical scholar Anghel Demetriescu, they formed their own literary club, which held its meetings in the Saint Sava basement, putting out the polygraphed magazine Armonia, then the bi-monthly Studentul Român.[5] Banu was also in a mathematics class taught by Ștefan Popescu. By his own recollection, he was a struggling student, and had much trouble learning trigonometry from the textbook of Spiru Haret—his future political mentor and employer.[6] He graduated from the literature and philosophy faculty of the University of Bucharest in 1895, and from the law faculty in 1900.[1] He had an enduring passion for history, as noted by his professor Nicolae Iorga, who recommended him for a teacher's chair.[3]

During a stint as a novice teacher in Brăila, he had his "second encounter" with Haret, who, as Education Minister, was personally inspecting the local schools. He equated listening to Haret's speech as a personal revelation about the sheer force of one's creative energies.[7] Returning to Bucharest, Banu began working as a history professor at Matei Basarab High School in 1898,[1] part of a teaching staff which came to include Dimitrie D. Pătrășcanu, Emanoil Grigorovitza, Theodor Speranția, Alexandru Toma, and Eugen Lovinescu.[8] He later transferred to the Nifon Mitropolitul Seminary.[1] In 1900, his former professor, folklorist Gheorghe Dem Theodorescu, died. At his funeral. Banu gave a rousing speech exhorting the values of work ethic.[9]

His political articles that appeared in Secolul XX starting in 1899, as well as his oratorical talent, drew the attention of Haret's own National Liberal Party (PNL).[1] Around 1903, he was a functionary in the upper echelons of Education Ministry, Chief Inspector of the Private Schools under Minister Haret,[10] in which capacity he first met and encouraged the novelist (and aspiring politician) Mihail Sadoveanu.[11] Working for the liberal press, he was editor-in-chief of Voința Națională from 1903 and director of Viitorul from 1907,[1] part of a team that also comprised Ion G. Duca and Henric Streitman.[12]

Running as a PNL member, Banu took a seat in to the Assembly of Deputies following the election of 1907 (he was Assembly Secretary from 1907 to 1911).[13] In 1910, he was among the jurors who condemned to prison Gheorghe Stoenescu-Jelea, the would-be assassin of Prime Minister Ion I. C. Brătianu.[14] Upon the Conservative Party return to power, he failed to win a seat in the 2nd College Ilfov County in the February 1911 election, running on a coalition anti-Conservative list headed by Nicolae Fleva.[15]

Banu's most important role involved heading or founding cultural and literary periodicals. Under his auspices, Voința Națională became a newspaper that consistently featured literature as well as commentary on literature, theater and painting. Under the pen name Teofil, he wrote the column Una-alta ("This and That") in a literary style, focusing both on politics and on his belief in the arts' value for society. It was also at this paper that he began a close collaboration with Petre Locusteanu.[1]

Flacăra creation

On October 22, 1911,[16] Banu and Locusteanu printed the first issue of Flacăra, a weekly literature and current events magazine. With a "people's agenda",[17] it had unparalleled success among the urban middle classes, particularly with its exposure of literary scandals,[2] but was poorly received by literary professionals. Due to criticism it received for its alleged eclecticism and lack of aesthetic discernment, the magazine became involved in polemics, mainly written by Banu,[1] who also personally interviewed his featured writers.[2] Largely through Locusteanu's contribution in publicity, Flacăra had a circulation of 30,000, which was unusually high for the demographic and literacy standards of the Kingdom of Romania.[18]

The magazine set out as a mainstream review, hosting established talents such as Ion Luca Caragiale and Barbu Ștefănescu Delavrancea; its most nonconformist contributors were "moderate" Romanian Symbolists: Ion Minulescu, Caton Theodorian, and Victor Eftimiu.[2] Most of Banu's own writings appeared in Flacăra; these included poems, aphorisms and literary, cultural and political articles. He also signed his work as Glaucon and Mefisto, and sometimes used Al. Șerban, Const. Paul and Cronicarul Dâmboviței, pen names he shared with Locusteanu.[1] His journalistic work, also carried in George Diamandy's Revista Democrației Române,[19] sought to express political objectivity and sincerity. Some of his socially themed texts, conceived as sketches or little scenes, denounced parasitism, lack of patriotism, arrogance and aggressive stupidity; his ideology veered toward sympathy and a sense of duty toward the productive classes.[1] According to literary historian George Călinescu, such works are without stylistic value: "C. Banu shows up in his aphorisms as a grieving but trite Guicciardini, of no humanistic worth".[2]

Over a few years, with Ion Pillat and Adrian Maniu as caretakers of the literary pages, Flacăra turned to more radical forms of modernism.[20] Pillat, Maniu, and Horia Furtună also "conspired" to relaunch here the disgraced Symbolist mentor, Alexandru Macedonski, serializing his novel Thalassa; and helped launch the career of George Bacovia, publishing his plaquette Plumb.[21] Symbolist N. Davidescu took over as the literary reviewer, pushing an aesthetic ideal that was inspired by readings from Remy de Gourmont;[22] the other staff reviewer was Spiru Hasnaș who, Călinescu notes, merely wrote "earnestly".[2]

In the years before World War I, returned to the Assembly, Banu debated major national issues with the Conservative Party doctrinaires. Responding to Constantin C. Arion's call for national unity after the Balkan Wars, he argued that such internal peace could never be achieved with "an aggrieved peasantry as the basis of our State". A land reform, he contended, could even make Romania into a great regional power.[23] Nevertheless, Banu was also critical of the populist currents undermining the PNL, and thus picked sides against Iorga and his Democratic Nationalists. His Facla articles, Iorga noted at the time, supported anti-nationalist causes such as Jewish emancipation,[24] while his parliamentary speeches expressed worries against the rise of Romania's insurrectionist "Boulangisme".[25] By 1914, Banu was also writing for the Flacăra satellite Semnalul, for the PNL paper Democrația, and for the literary bimonthly Văpaia.[26]

World War I

Plaque honoring the 1917–1918 National Committee for Romanian Unity, at the former Hôtel des deux mondes, Avenue de l'Opéra, Paris. Banu credited as one of three La Roumanie editors

Romania kept neutral during the first two years of war, but an intellectual battle divided Romanian society, between "Francophiles" who supported the Entente and "Germanophiles" who looked to the Central Powers. Banu and the National Liberals leaned toward the Entente Francophiles. In October 1914, he directed a rally of university students who vandalized the offices of Ziua, a Germanophile daily put out by Ioan Slavici, and chanted threats against Grigore Gheorghe Cantacuzino, owner of the Germanophile Seara.[27]

Flacăra also followed the Ententist line, notably with texts by Barbu Nemțeanu.[28] Although, as historian Lucian Boia writes, it remained "without jarring partisanship",[29] Flacăra's Ententist-and-populist tinges were ridiculed and parodied in Chemarea, the radical-left Symbolist review put out by Ion Vinea.[28] Banu's 1916 book Sub mască ("Under the Mask"), signed Mefisto, included poems initially published in Flacăra's "Gazeta rimată" column. Their subjects received varying treatment, with tones that ranged from humor and pamphleteering jokes to invective. As critics note, his critical virulence and moralizing intent were balanced by a certain literary talent, itself subsumed by the categorical nature of polemic.[1] Also published that year, the brochure Trăiască viaţa!… ("Long Live Life!…") is a collection of articles, some of them distinctly autobiographical.[1]

Honoring its secret commitment to the Entente, Romania entered the war in August 1916. Flacăra closed down with a final issue on November 13 of that year,[30] as Bucharest prepared for the German siege. Banu later escaped to Paris, where, from January 1918, he joined the directorial staff of La Roumanie journal (with Emil Fagure and Constantin Mille), campaigning in French for the cause of Greater Romania.[31] He intervened directly to obtain statements of solidarity with beleaguered Romania from Ernest Lavisse, Lucien Poincaré, and other French academics, while trying in vain to prevent the Romanian government from negotiating a separate peace with the Central Powers.[32] With the turn of tides, Banu formed part of the Romanian delegation to the Paris Peace Conference in 1919, attending as co-director of La Roumanie.[1] He put out two more editions of Flacăra between December 10, 1921 and June 1923, with contributions from old regulars such as Minulescu and Macedonski, and with Vintilă Russu-Șirianu as his second.[33] During that interval, he was also one of the regulars at Cuget Românesc monthly.[34]

As Minister, and later life

A Senator, Banu served as Arts and Religious Affairs Minister under Prime Minister Brătianu, from 1922 to 1923.[1] During that time, he involved himself in negotiating a Concordat, in the hope of normalizing relations with the Holy See. According to memoirist and PNL man Ion Rusu Abrudeanu, Banu erred in keeping by his side the Greek Catholic functionary Zenovie Pâclișanu, who stood accused of undermining the PNL and of leaking the Concordat draft to the Catholic press in Transylvania.[35] Reportedly, Pâclișanu also sabotaged Banu's investigation into allegations of church art smuggling by Catholic clergymen who migrated to Hungary.[36]

Banu's accomplishments as minister include his successful promotion of Romania's first copyright law, on January 15, 1923.[37] He also founded an Inspectorate of Romanian Museums, under Alexandru Tzigara-Samurcaș, but withheld its financing later on.[38] The two politicians negotiated for an reciprocal exchange of coveted cultural goods between, on one hand, Romania and, on the other, Weimar Germany and the Austrian Republic. They only managed to obtain the Cucuteni Treasure from Berlin.[39]

Replaced in his function by Alexandru Lapedatu, Banu largely withdrew from public life. His articles and musings were being still published in Adevărul, Convorbiri Literare, and Cele Trei Crișuri.[1] In 1927, celebrating the golden jubilee of Romanian Independence with conferences at the Bucharest Atheneum, Banu outlined his liberal critique of the conservative ethos, turning against "reactionary" cultural figures such as Caragiale, Mihail Eminescu, and the Junimea circle.[40] As Caragiale scholar Șerban Cioculescu noted at the time, Banu's "effete phraseology" and "cliche vocabulary" encased his resentments against conservative intellectuals, who had exposed and satirized the "characteristics of practical liberalism".[41]

Between 1927 and 1930, the PNL polarized into competing factions: one led by Vintilă Brătianu and the other, the "Georgists", by Gheorghe Brătianu. Banu was on the side of the former, and also expressed his faction's sympathy for King Carol II, who had returned from exile to reclaim his throne.[42] By December 1933, with Vintilă dead and Duca, his one-time colleague at Viitorul, in charge of the party, Banu had embraced Georgism and defected to the PNL's seceded wing, the "National Liberal Party-Brătianu". He and Artur Văitoianu were the most notorious PNL assets to follow Gheorghe Brătianu on this venture.[43] This move was also a sign of Banu's opposition to the politically ambitious Carol II: Banu, Brătianu, and Constantin C. Giurescu were working on a proclamation against Carol, his camarilla, and Duca, the acting PNL Prime Minister. A year later, after Duca's unexpected assassination by the Iron Guard, a National Peasants' Party administration intervened to stop Banu, Brătianu, P. P. Negulescu and others from coordinating massive opposition rallies.[44]

Banu's final book appeared in 1937 as Grădina lui Glaucon sau Manualul bunului politician ("Glaucon's Garden or A Textbook for Good Politicians"). Here, he uses his political and artistic experience to analyze his peers in 757 sections (aphorisms, words of advice and morality sketches). Through these, he shows his ethical leanings, irony, and skepticism, formulating concise general judgments.[1] Banu died three years later at a hospital in Roman,[3] and was buried in Plot 21 of Bellu Cemetery, Bucharest.[45] His former mentor and adversary Iorga paid homage to him with an obituary in Neamul Românesc, emphasizing that Banu, the "unusual figure" among his peers, belonged to an older era of "dignity and decency, when people were held up by talent and merit".[3] Banu's oratory was of "great formal restraint, unjarring."[46]

Notes

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 (Romanian) «Rotonda 13: Constantin Banu şi Revista Flacăra», la MNLR, Agenția de Carte
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Călinescu, p. 713
  3. 1 2 3 4 Iorga (1967), p. 380
  4. ↑ Rusu Abrudeanu (1930), p. 557
  5. ↑ Ion Livescu, Amintiri și scrieri despre teatru, pp. 7, 299–300. Bucharest: Editura pentru literatură, 1967
  6. ↑ Banu, pp. 169–171
  7. ↑ Banu, pp. 171–175
  8. ↑ Popescu-Cadem, p. 260
  9. ↑ Petre Haneș, "Figuri de dascăli. II: Teodorescu. Gh. Dem.", in Preocupări Literare, Nr. 1/1942, p. 42
  10. ↑ Popescu-Cadem, p. 170
  11. ↑ (Romanian) Ion Simuț, "Centenarul debutului sadovenian", in România Literară, Nr. 41/2004
  12. ↑ S. Podoleanu, 60 scriitori români de origină evreească, Vol. II, p. 311. Bucharest: Bibliografia, Bucharest, [1935]. OCLC 40106291
  13. ↑ Călinescu, p. 720
  14. ↑ Constantin Bacalbașa, Bucureștii de altă dată, Vol. III, p. 256. Bucharest: Universul, 1936
  15. ↑ Constantin Bacalbașa, Bucureștii de altă dată, Vol. IV, pp. 12–14. Bucharest: Universul, 1936
  16. ↑ Călinescu, p. 713; Baiculescu et al., p. 245; Desa et al., p. 348
  17. ↑ Cernat, p. 54
  18. ↑ Boia, pp. 96–97
  19. ↑ Baiculescu et al., p. 532
  20. ↑ Călinescu, p. 713; Cernat, pp. 23, 32, 54, 61
  21. ↑ Tudor Vianu, Scriitori români, Vol. III, Editura Minerva, Bucharest, 1971, pp. 353, 383. OCLC 7431692
  22. ↑ Cernat, p. 61
  23. ↑ Sebastian-Dragoș Bunghez, "Parlamentul și politica externă a României în ajunul Primului Război Mondial (februarie-iunie 1914)", in Cercetări Istorice, Vol. 33, 2014, pp. 197–198
  24. ↑ Nicolae Iorga, Acțiunea militară a României. În Bulgaria cu ostașii noștri, p. 19. Bucharest: Editura Socec, 1914
  25. ↑ Nicolae Iorga, Oameni cari au fost, Vol. II, p. 332. Bucharest: Editura Fundațiilor Regale, 1935
  26. ↑ Baiculescu et al., pp. 178, 613, 694
  27. ↑ Carmen Patricia Reneti, "Relații româno-germane în anul 1914", in Revista de Istorie Militară, Nr. 1–2/2010, pp. 36, 39
  28. 1 2 Cernat, pp. 107–108
  29. ↑ Boia, p. 97
  30. ↑ Baiculescu et al., p. 245; Desa et al., p. 348
  31. ↑ Desa et al., pp. 829–830; Rusu Abrudeanu (1921), pp. 442–443
  32. ↑ Rusu Abrudeanu (1921), pp. 446–450
  33. ↑ Desa et al., p. 209
  34. ↑ Desa et al., p. 209
  35. ↑ Rusua Abrudeanu, pp. 557, 562–563, 565–568
  36. ↑ Rusu Abrudeanu (1930), pp. 564–565
  37. ↑ (Romanian) Cassian Maria Spiridon, "Secolul breslei scriitoricești", in Convorbiri Literare, April 2008
  38. ↑ Tzigara-Samurcaș, pp. 165–166
  39. ↑ Tzigara-Samurcaș, p. 338
  40. ↑ Cioculescu, pp. 151–154
  41. ↑ Cioculescu, pp. 153–154
  42. ↑ Ioan Lupaș, "Între «Vintiliști» și «Gheorghiști»", in Țara Noastră, Nr. 10/1930, p. 945
  43. ↑ Vasile Netea, Memorii. Târgu Mureș: Editura Nico, 2010, p. 204. ISBN 978-606-546-049-2
  44. ↑ Petre Țurlea, "România sub stăpânirea Camarilei Regale (1930–1940) (III)", in Analele Universității Creștine Dimitrie Cantemir. Seria Istorie, Vol. 2, Issues 1–2, pp. 172–173, 190–191
  45. ↑ Gheorghe G. Bezviconi, Necropola Capitalei, p. 63. Bucharest: Nicolae Iorga Institute of History, 1972
  46. ↑ Iorga (1967), p. 381

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Saturday, April 30, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.