Controversies of the United States Senate election in Maryland, 2006

This article covers the controversies of Maryland's 2006 campaign for the U.S. Senate between Democrat Ben Cardin and Republican Michael Steele.

Racial attacks during campaign

Since announcing his candidacy, Steele had been the target of attacks that he says are racially tinged. A blog run by a Steve Gilliard,[1] a politically liberal African-American, depicted Steele as a blackface minstrel. Tim Kaine, the Democratic Governor of Virginia, subsequently pulled all his ads from the blog.

Stem cell comparison

When discussing his position on embryonic stem cells before Jewish leaders on February 9, 2006, Steele compared the science with experiments performed on Jews during the Holocaust and with slavery, saying, "(Y)ou of all folks know what happens when people decide they want to experiment on human beings.... I know that as well in my community, out of our experience with slavery, and so I'm very cautious when people say this is the best new thing, this is going to save lives."[2] Art Abramson, executive director of the Baltimore Jewish Council, criticized Steele for his remarks, rejecting the comparison "between ethical and lifesaving medical research, and the horrors committed by the Nazis in their evil drive to create a master race." Cardin, who is Jewish and a supporter of embryonic stem-cell research, also criticized Steele.[2]

DSCC credit report incident

Staffers of the DSCC illegally obtained a copy of Steele's credit report during the campaign. Researcher Lauren Weiner used Steele's SSN to obtain his credit report from TransUnion. Weiner used Research Director Katie Barge's DSCC credit card to pay for the report. After an internal investigation, the Maryland Democratic Party determined the credit report was obtained illegally, and reported the incident to the U.S. Attorney.[3] Weiner pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge of computer fraud and will do 150 hours of community service. Barge resigned from the DSCC.[4][5] [6] Steele has commented upon the incident: "It is a stain on the entire organization and the operations of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. It's the kind of politics that turns people off and demeans the electoral process."[7]

Steele used the incident in a fund-raising mailing and attack ads against Ben Cardin. Steele stated in the fund-raising letter "from stealing my credit report to endless personal attacks, Congressman Ben Cardin just can't seem to have a real debate on the issues..." In the TV ad, Steele said "Ben Cardin's team hacks into my credit report...". Cardin responded "and Michael Steele knows this – there is no connection whatsoever with the [credit report] episode and [me] or my campaign."

Campaign website

In July 2006, Steele posted photographs on his website that included him with prominent local and national Democrats from events where Steele appeared as the Lieutenant Governor, not as a candidate, without their permission. The posting came under criticism from the local party and Steny Hoyer (D-5th), and Steele removed the photos.[8] The Maryland Democratic Party started its own website with photographs of Steele with Republicans unpopular in the state.[9]

Martin Luther King, Jr. advertisement

In September 2006, an advertisement run by the National Black Republican Association in support of Steele generated controversy for its claims. For example, it claimed that Martin Luther King, Jr., was a Republican. The ad also accused Democrats in general of opposing civil rights legislation and releasing "vicious dogs and fire hoses on blacks." [10] After hearing the ad for himself, Steele disavowed it and asked that it be pulled from the air.

Cardin staffer blogging

On September 16, 2006, Cardin's campaign fired a staffer who had maintained a blog about her experiences within the campaign. In addition to revealing details about the campaign, some of the blog entries contained racial and ethnic slurs. For example, some entries discussed the hypersensitivity of the campaign to racial issues, claiming that a black staffer on the campaign was able to keep his job solely due to playing "the racism card". In another entry, the staffer expressed her belief that she was a "sex object" for Jewish friends of Cardin, whom she described as having "Jewish noses."[11] Although the Cardin campaign maintained it was a "junior staffer," some bloggers revealed that the staffer was Ursula Gruber, a regional director in charge of other workers in the campaign.[12][13]

Handing out misleading voter guides

On November 7, 2006, Bob Ehrlich's gubernatorial re-election campaign and Michael Steele's Maryland senatorial campaign recruited seven busloads of homeless Philadelphians to distribute misleading voter guides in Maryland. Each "official voter guide", headlined "Democratic Sample Ballot", had boxes checked beside Ehrlich's and Steele's names and those of Democratic candidates in other races, with photos of black Democratic leaders on the front. The fliers were handed out to mostly poor and black voters in Prince George's County in Maryland. Workers said that first lady Kendel Ehrlich personally gave them T-shirts and hats and thanked them. However, Ehrlich claimed to be unaware that these workers were hired from Philadelphia. The campaign tactic was widely criticized by Democrats for confusing and misleading voters.[14][15]

Election-eve campaign mailers

On November 6, 2006, the day before the general election, Gov. Ehrlich's and Lt. Gov. Steele's campaigns mailed a flier to a number of Prince George's County residents. The flier, a self-proclaimed "Ehrlich-Steele Democrats Official Voter Guide," was a sample ballot endorsing Ehrlich and Steele alongside numerous Democratic politicians. The front cover of the mailer featured pictures of several current and former Democratic candidates for public office, with the text, "These Are Our Choices."

Many Democrats criticized the mailer as misleading, as it could imply that Ehrlich and Steele were Democrats. (The text on the back of the mailer encouraged Democrats to vote for Republican candidates, but the sample ballot itself made no mention of the candidates' party affiliations.) Others, including Kweisi Mfume and Jack B. Johnson said that the featuring of three Prince George's County Democrats on the front of the mailer suggested that they all had endorsed Ehrlich and Steele, which was not the case.[16]

Alleged misuse of campaign funds

In 2009, it became known that Steele's former finance chairman, Alan B. Fabian, had reported to federal prosecutors that Steele used his 2006 Senate campaign fund to pay a by-then-defunct company, Brown Sugar Unlimited run by his sister, for "catering/web services" that were allegedly never performed.[17][18] Fabian provided the information to federal prosecutors in 2008 during his plea negotiations on unrelated fraud charges (for which he was sentenced to 9 years in prison).[17] On February 7, 2009, Steele, through a spokesman, said that the payments to his sister "were fully disclosed and are completely proper and in full compliance with all state and federal laws."[19]

In March 2009, Jayne Miller of WBAL Baltimore 11 reported that Steele's Senate campaign made four payments for "political consulting" in October and November 2006 to the company Allied Berton, totaling more than $64,000; the company also received more than $350,000 during the same period from campaign committees controlled by Maryland Governor Robert Ehrlich and the Maryland Republican party. Allied Berton's business, according to its website, was trading commodities, such as minerals, metals, coffee and sugar. According to Miller's report, the owner of the firm, Sandy Roberts, hosted a tribute to Michael Steele in New York during the 2004 Republican National Convention and was the beneficiary of an Ehrlich-Steele administration action which paved the way for a multiple-outlet retail concession at Baltimore Washington International Airport. A Steele spokesman said only that his campaign complied with all Federal Election Commission regulations.[20]

References

  1. ↑ "The News Blog". Stevegilliard.blogspot.com. December 28, 2005. Retrieved 2010-01-13.
  2. 1 2 Dennison, Thomas (February 10, 2006). "Cardins blast Steele for comparing stem cell research to the Holocaust". gazette.net (Post-Newsweek Media). Retrieved 2008-11-12.
  3. ↑ Cella, Matthew (September 21, 2005). "Democrats got Steele's credit report". Washington Times. Retrieved 2006-09-18.
  4. ↑ Wagner, John (March 16, 2006). "Researcher Will Face Charges in Steele Case". The Washington Post (washingtonpost.com). Retrieved 2010-01-13.
  5. ↑
  6. ↑ Wagner, John (March 16, 2006). "Researcher Will Face Charges in Steele Case". Washington Post. pp. B04. Retrieved 2006-09-18.
  7. ↑ "Democrat to Plead Guilty to Steele Credit Report Crime". NewsMax. March 17, 2006. Retrieved 2006-09-19.
  8. ↑ Mosk, Matthew (July 11, 2006). "Steele's Web Site Parades Democrats". The Washington Post (washingtonpost.com). p. B05. Retrieved 2010-01-13.
  9. ↑ "Free Download". therealsteele.com. Retrieved 2010-01-13.
  10. ↑ Mosk, Matthew (September 21, 2006). "Black GOP Groups Woo Mfume, Blast Democrats to Back Steele - washingtonpost.com". The Washington Post (washingtonpost.com). Retrieved 2010-01-13.
  11. ↑ John Fritze, Baltimore Sun, "Cardin campaign staffer fired over racial blog posts", September 17, 2006.
  12. ↑ "Secret Cardin Staffer Blog Exposed! (Wizbang Politics)". Politics.wizbangblog.com. September 15, 2006. Retrieved 2010-01-13.
  13. ↑ "More Trouble For Ben Cardin Over Persuasionatrix Blogger (Wizbang Politics)". Politics.wizbangblog.com. September 17, 2006. Retrieved 2010-01-13.
  14. ↑ Ernesto Londono, "Sample Ballots in Pr. George's Misidentify Candidates", Washington Post, November 7, 2006
  15. ↑ Matthew Mosk and Avis Thomas-Lester, "GOP Fliers Apparently Were Part Of Strategy: Md. Tactics Similar To Ones in 2002", Washington Post, November 13, 2006
  16. ↑ Mosk, Matthew (November 7, 2006). "Democrats Denounce Flier Mailed by GOP.". Washington Post. Retrieved 2006-11-12.
  17. 1 2 Cauvin, Henri E. (February 7, 2009). "Steele's Campaign Spending Questioned: Agents Contact Sister After Ex-Aide's Claims". Washington Post. p. A01. Retrieved February 7, 2009.
  18. ↑ Lipton, Eric (February 7, 2009). "New G.O.P. Chairman Defends Payment to Sister". The New York Times. Retrieved February 11, 2009.
  19. ↑ Lipton, Eric (February 7, 2009). "New G.O.P. Chairman Defends Payment to Sister". The New York Times. Retrieved May 14, 2009.
  20. ↑ Jayne Miller (February 27, 2009). "I-Team Questions 2006 Campaign Expenditures". WBAL TV 11 News.
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Thursday, January 21, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.