Deaths of Phillip Esposito and Louis Allen

Deaths of Phillip Esposito and Louis Allen

A temporary memorial to Phillip Esposito and Louis Allen
erected in Tikrit shortly after their deaths
Date June 7, 2005 (2005-06-07)
Location Forward Operating Base Danger, Tikrit, Iraq
Accused Staff Sergeant Alberto B. Martinez
Charges Two counts of premeditated murder
Verdict Acquittal

The fragging deaths of Phillip Esposito and Louis Allen occurred on June 7, 2005, at Forward Operating Base Danger in Tikrit, Iraq. Captain Phillip Esposito and First Lieutenant Louis Allen, from a New York Army National Guard unit of the United States 42nd Infantry Division, were mortally wounded in Esposito's office by a Claymore mine and died.

Military investigators determined that the mine was deliberately placed in the window and detonated to kill Esposito and Allen. Staff Sergeant Alberto B. Martinez, who was in the officers' unit, was charged with two counts of premeditated murder. In 2006, two years before the trial, Martinez volunteered in a plea bargain to plead guilty to murder in exchange for a life sentence without parole; Lt. Gen. John Vines, commander of the Army’s 18th Airborne Corps and the convening authority, rejected the deal. In the court martial, Martinez was acquitted on December 4, 2008 at Fort Bragg, North Carolina.

The case was one of only two publicly known alleged fragging incidents among American forces during the Iraq War and the only one to take place in Iraq, in contrast to numerous incidents among United States forces during the Vietnam War of the 1960s and early 70s. In April 2005, Sergeant Hasan Karim Akbar was convicted on charges of premeditated murder and sentenced to death for the first incident, which took place in March 2003 in Kuwait. Due to the sentence, as of August 2013, his case is still proceeding through automatic appeals.

Attack

On the evening of June 7, 2005, Captain Phillip Esposito, 30, and First Lieutenant Louis Allen, 34, were playing the board game Risk in Esposito's office in the Water Palace building on the United States Forward Operating Base (FOB) Danger in Tikrit, Iraq. The officers were from the Headquarters and Headquarters Company of the 42nd Infantry Division, a New York Army National Guard unit from Troy, New York; it was deployed to Iraq in support of American operations in the Iraq War. Esposito was the company commander and had been stationed in Iraq about six months. Allen was the company's new operations officer; he had arrived in the unit just four days before.[1]

At 10 p.m., a M18A1 Claymore mine placed next to the window of Esposito's office exploded, blasting 700 steel ball bearings into the office space and fatally wounding the two officers.[2] Seconds later, several grenades exploded in the vicinity of Esposito's office. The two injured officers were rushed to a hospital at Forward Operating Base Speicher. Both died early June 8, 2005, from serious internal injuries suffered in the first explosion.[3]

Victims

Focus on Martinez

In 2005, Army prosecutors accused Staff Sergeant Alberto B. Martinez of Schaghticoke, New York, (above), of murdering Captain Phillip Esposito and First Lieutenant Louis Allen. An XVIII Airborne Corps court-martial subsequently acquitted Martinez of all charges on December 4th, 2008.

Military investigators initially thought that the two officers were killed by an insurgent mortar or rocket attack. When they determined that the blast was deliberately caused by a hand-placed explosive device, they began looking for suspects. Learning that Staff Sergeant Alberto B. Martinez, 37, had made numerous threats against Esposito, and based on their investigation, they arrested and charged him with two counts of premeditated murder. This happened the same week in June that Esposito and Allen were buried in their home towns.[5]

From Schaghticoke, New York near Troy, Martinez is married with two children.[5] He had joined the National Guard in 1990 and been assigned to Iraq in 2004.[5] He was serving as the supply sergeant of the unit headed by Esposito and Allen.[2][6]

Esposito and Martinez had come into conflict before arriving in Tikrit in April 2004, as Esposito tried to bring the sergeant in line.[5] Martinez was later described in court "as a poorly disciplined and foul-mouthed guardsman who needed a special waiver to qualify for duty."[2] Witnesses testified that Martinez "could not account for hundreds of thousands of dollars in missing equipment."[2] Esposito eventually restricted Martinez from going into the supply area without an escort.[2] Martinez feared Esposito would get him kicked out of the Guard, costing him $2,859 in monthly pay.[2]

Witnesses later testified that Martinez had openly threatened to kill Esposito. The captain had already disciplined Martinez for poor job performance; he had also initiated proceedings that might have resulted in Martinez being discharged from the military or removed from his full-time Guard position.[6] Esposito was considered the target of the attack, as Allen had arrived in the unit in Tikrit only days before.[5] Witnesses placed Martinez in the vicinity of the Water Palace shortly after the explosion.[2][6]

Proceeding to trial

In October and November 2005, the military held an Article 32 hearing, similar to a grand jury hearing, in Kuwait rather than Tikrit, in order to allow the wives of Martinez, Esposito and Allen to attend; all three did. In addition, the Army arranged for transmission of an audio link of the two-day proceedings to West Point to allow other family members in the area to follow them.[1]

Nine witnesses testified. Colonel Patrick Reinert recommended a general court-martial for Martinez on murder charges based on the evidence presented.[1]

In early 2006 Martinez learned of additional evidence against him. This included testimony from a soldier who said she had given Martinez Claymore mines and grenades shortly before the killings. On April 3, 2006, he volunteered to plead guilty to murder in exchange for a life sentence with the possibility of parole after 10 years. But, Lieutenant General John Vines, commander of the XVIII Airborne Corps and convening authority over the legal proceedings, rejected the plea agreement. Vines sent the case to court-martial under two counts of premeditated murder, Article 118 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice.[6]

In April 2007 the defense asked for more time to prepare its case and presented the judge with four motions. In addition to the charges of premeditated murder, at the time Martinez was charged with one count each of wrongful possession of a privately owned firearm, unexploded ordnance, and alcohol. The other charge against him was for wrongfully giving government property, in this case printers and copiers, to an Iraqi national. One of the defense motions was to sever the murder charges from the others. The case was scheduled to go to trial in August 2007.[7]

In August 2008, the defense asked the judge to dismiss the murder charges, because of what they alleged was the prosecutor trying to influence a witness who could help the defense. The judge refused the request.[8]

The court-martial was held at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, beginning in October 2008, with Colonel Stephen Henley sitting as the trial judge. During the trial, Sergeant Sandra Pelton, a 42nd Division cook, testified for the prosecution that Martinez twice mentioned fragging when he came through her dining facility a few days before the explosion. On one occasion when Pelton asked Martinez how he was doing, he made a noise simulating an explosion and said, "Frag him, frag. I mean it."[9] Approximately 20 other soldiers and officers testified that they had heard Martinez threaten or insult Esposito.[10]

Martinez's defense team countered that the Army's evidence against Martinez was circumstantial, and prosecution witnesses' testimonies were inconsistent. The defense team also presented evidence that Martinez was not the only soldier in the unit with a grudge against Esposito. After two days of deliberations, the jury acquitted Martinez on December 4, 2008. In the military, a two-thirds vote by the jury is needed for conviction. The prosecutor in the case speculated that some jurors' known opposition to the death penalty may have influenced their votes for acquittal.[6]

Acquittal and honorable discharge

Soon after his acquittal, Martinez received an honorable discharge from the military; he "proclaimed his innocence and a sense of vindication."[6] The prosecution repeated their belief that he was guilty; they were crushed by the verdict. The U.S. Army has not publicly identified or charged any other suspects in the killings.[6]

When it was revealed that Martinez had offered in 2006 to plead guilty in a plea bargain, debate arose again about whether the prosecution's pursuit of the death penalty may lead defendants to plead guilty for crimes they have not committed. This has been an issue in the civilian justice system. At the same time, military spokesmen had discussed concerns that Martinez might have gotten parole within 10 years if sentenced to life, even after pleading guilty to killing the two officers.[6]

Siobhan Esposito and Barbara Allen, the widows of the officers, have continued to pursue justice for their husbands' deaths. Esposito opposed the Obama administration's nomination of Major General Joseph Taluto as director of the Army National Guard.[11] Taluto served as the general in charge of their husbands' National Guard unit. Esposito argued that Taluto should have taken action and disciplined Martinez for his many threats against her husband, and thus prevented the attack.[12] After Esposito complained to the Senate Armed Services Committee about Taluto, he withdrew his nomination. "Since the trial, the widows have pushed for the military to strictly enforce regulations that prohibit threats against superiors and require soldiers to report violations of "good order and discipline."[10]

The case was one of only two publicly known instances of U.S. Army enlisted soldiers charged with intentionally killing superior officers during the Iraq war, and the only one to occur in Iraq. In 2005, Hasan Akbar was convicted of killing two officers in Kuwait in 2003.[6]

References

  1. 1 2 3 Giordono, Joseph (November 1, 2005). "Hearing starts for soldier accused of fragging in Iraq". Stars and Stripes. Retrieved February 23, 2009.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Zucchino, David (November 29, 2008). "For two widows, a soldier's trial is their battlefield". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved February 23, 2009.
  3. ↑ Gavin, Robert (December 16, 2008). "Army Staff Sergeant Alberto Martinez, Acquitted of Murder of Two Officers in Iraq, Speaks with Reporter". Times Union (Albany). Archived from the original (Reprint of newspaper article) on February 11, 2009. Retrieved February 23, 2009.
  4. ↑ Easley, Hema (June 16, 2005). "More than 500 attend Esposito funeral". The Journal News. Retrieved February 23, 2009.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Giordono, Joseph (June 18, 2005). "Guardsman faces murder charges in deaths of two officers at FOB Danger". Stars and Stripes. Retrieved February 23, 2009.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 von Zielbauer, Paul (February 21, 2009). "After Guilty Plea Offer, G.I. Cleared of Iraq Deaths" (Newspaper article). New York Times. Retrieved February 23, 2009.
  7. ↑ Staff, "Defense for alleged fragger asks for more time", Military Times, 18 April 2007, accessed 15 March 2013
  8. ↑ Associated Press (August 22, 2008). "Judge refuses to dismiss Martinez charges". Military Times. Retrieved February 23, 2009.
  9. ↑ Thompson, Estes (November 25, 2008). "Defense wraps up in fragging court-martial". Military Times. Retrieved February 23, 2009.
  10. 1 2 David Zucchino, "Widows pursue justice in soldiers' slayings", Los Angeles Times, 8 April 2010, 15 March 2013
  11. ↑ http://siobhanesposito.blogspot.com/2009/05/fragging-widow-slams-taluto-as-unfit-to.html
  12. ↑ http://siobhanesposito.blogspot.com/2009/05/media-mentions-and-armys-spin.html

Further reading

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Wednesday, March 09, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.