Decline and Fall of the Freudian Empire

Decline and Fall of the Freudian Empire

Cover of the first edition
Author Hans Eysenck
Country United Kingdom
Language English
Subject Sigmund Freud
Published 1985 (Viking)
Media type Print (hardcover and paperback)
Pages 224 (1986 Pelican edition)
ISBN 0-14-022562-5 (1986 Pelican edition)

Decline and Fall of the Freudian Empire (1985; second edition 2004) is a book by psychologist Hans Eysenck, in which Eysenck criticizes Sigmund Freud and argues that psychoanalysis is unscientific. The revised edition has a preface by the author's widow, Sybil Eysenck.[1]

Summary

Eysenck argues that psychoanalysis is unscientific and that its theories are based on no legitimate base of observation or experiment and have the status only of speculation. Eysenck argues that the veracity of psychoanalysis is testable through traditional empirical means, and that in all areas where such tests have been carried out it has failed.[2] Eysenck calls Freud, "a genius, not of science, but of propaganda, not of rigorous proof, but of persuasion, not of the design of experiments, but of literary art."[2] According to Eysenck, Freud set back the study of psychology and psychiatry by around fifty years.[3] Eysenck calls psychoanalyst Ernest Jones' The Life and Work of Sigmund Freud (1953-1957) the "most famous" biography of Freud, but sees it as "more a mythology than a history, leaving out as it does nearly all the warts and making many alterations to the portrait by suppressing data and items which might reflect unfavourably on Freud." Eysenck gives favorable evaluations of several works critical of psychoanalysis, including psychiatrist Henri Ellenberger's The Discovery of the Unconscious (1970), psychologist Frank Sulloway's Freud, Biologist of the Mind (1979), Jacques Van Rillaer's Les Illusions de la Psychanalyse (1980), and philosopher Adolf Grünbaum's The Foundations of Psychoanalysis (1984). He accepts Elizabeth Thornton's argument, made in her Freud and Cocaine (1983), also published under the title The Freudian Fallacy, that Freud's patient Anna O. suffered from tuberculous meningitis.[4][5]

Scholarly reception

Malcolm Macmillan writes in Freud Evaluated (1991) that Eysenck is one of several authors to have argued that Anna O. suffered from an organic malady. He observes these authors provide conflicting accounts of what malady Anna O. suffered from, and argues that establishing any retrospective diagnosis with certainty is difficult.[6] Author Richard Webster writes in Why Freud Was Wrong (1995) that Decline and Fall of the Freudian Empire contains many cogent criticisms of Freud. However, he criticizes Eysenck for accepting uncritically Thornton's argument that Freud's patient Anna O. suffered from tuberculous meningitis.[4]

References

Footnotes

  1. ↑ Wilcocks.
  2. 1 2 Frosh 1987. pp. 6, 276.
  3. ↑ Eysenck 1986. p. 202.
  4. 1 2 Webster 2005. pp. 577-78.
  5. ↑ Eysenck 1986. pp. 212-213.
  6. ↑ Macmillan 1997. pp. 10, 684.

Bibliography

Books
  • Eysenck, Hans (1986). Decline and Fall of the Freudian Empire. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books. ISBN 0-14-022562-5. 
  • Frosh, Stephen (1987). The Politics of Psychoanalysis: An Introduction to Freudian and Post-Freudian Theory. Hong Kong: Macmillan Education. ISBN 0-333-39613-8. 
  • Macmillan, Malcolm (1997). Freud Evaluated: The Completed Arc. Cambridge: The MIT Press. pp. 10, 684. ISBN 0-262-63171-7. 
  • Webster, Richard (2005). Why Freud Was Wrong: Sin, Science and Psychoanalysis. Oxford: The Orwell Press. pp. 577–578. ISBN 0-9515922-5-4. 
Online articles
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Sunday, May 01, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.