Distribution waterfall

In private equity investing, distribution waterfall is a method by which the capital gained by the fund is allocated between the limited partners (LPs) and the general partner (GP).[1][1]

Overview

In a private equity fund, the general partner manages the committed capital of the limited partners. The GP usually commits some amount to the fund, usually 1 to 2% of the commitment. When distributing the capital back to the investor, hopefully with an added value, the general partner will allocate this amount based on a previously agreed waterfall structure.

A waterfall structure can be pictured as a set of buckets or phases. Each bucket contains its own allocation method. When the bucket is full, the capital flows into the next bucket. The first buckets are usually entirely allocated to the LPs, while buckets further away from the source are more advantageous to the GP. This structure is designed to encourage the general partner to maximize the return of the fund.

Typical distribution waterfall

A standard distribution waterfall is defined by a hurdle rate, a catchup rate and a carried interest rate.

Multihurdle waterfall

A GP may decide to define many hurdle rates, each linked to a specific allocation. In this case, the higher hurdles are linked to allocations more favorable to the general partner. An example of hurdle would look like:

Hurdle Carried Interest
Preferred return: 8% 10% / 90%
Hurdle 1: 11% 20% / 80%
Hurdle 2: 15% 25% / 75%

European vs American waterfall

The European waterfall, or global waterfall, means that the hurdle threshold is calculated at fund level.[2][3] The American waterfall, or deal-by-deal waterfall, calculates the hurdle thresholds for each deal. The American waterfall is more favorable to the GP than the European watefall:

To mitigate the effect of a deal-by-deal waterfall and to make it more attractive to LPs, private equity funds using an American waterfall may include a clawback clause in their LPAs.[4]

Clawback clause

When liquidating the fund, if the LPs were distributed less than the agreed preferred return, they claw back the missing amount from the carried interest distributed to the GP.[4][5] The clawback clause is triggered at the very end of the fund, at a time where the General Partner may have already put the clawback amount to other use.

In August 2010, Blackstone Group returned $3 million in carried interest to the limited partner of a fund as part of a clawback provision.[6]

See also

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Thursday, October 22, 2015. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.