District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority

The District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority (DC Water) provides drinking water, sewage collection and sewage treatment in Washington, D.C.. DC Water also provides wholesale wastewater treatment services to several adjoining municipalities in Maryland and Virginia. In addition, DC Water provides maintenance and repair of more than 9,000 public fire hydrants on behalf of the District of Columbia. DC Water was created in 1996, when the District Government and the U.S. federal government established it as an independent authority of the District government.

DC Water provides more than 600,000 residents, 16.6 million annual visitors and 700,000 people who are employed in the District of Columbia with water, sewage and wastewater treatment. DC Water also provides wholesale wastewater treatment for 1.6 million people in Montgomery and Prince George’s counties in Maryland, and Fairfax and Loudoun counties in Virginia.[1]

History

In 2010, under new leadership, the Authority underwent a rebranding effort. The rebranding included a new logo, new color palette, and a new name. Since its inception, the Authority had been doing business as DC Water. The legal name remains the District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority.

Drinking water

In 1852, Congress commissioned the construction of an aqueduct system to provide a reliable supply of drinking water to the city from the Potomac River. The US Army Corps of Engineers designed and built the Washington Aqueduct, which began full operation in 1864. Filtration plants were added to the system in the 20th century.[2][3]

Wastewater Treatment

In 1938, the District of Columbia built a sewage treatment plant in the Blue Plains area, at the southernmost tip of DC. The cost was $4 million. The plant was built to stop raw sewage from entering the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers. At that time, the plant was built to treat sewage from a population of 650,000, with a capacity of 100 million gallons per day (mgd). By 1943, the population grew to 1.5 million people, contributing much more sewage, and upgrades to the plant were necessary.[4][5] Secondary treatment units were added in 1959, with an expanded discharge capacity of 240 mgd. In the 1970s a major expansion commenced that led to construction of advanced wastewater treatment components, and by 1983 the capacity was 300 mgd.[6]

Statistics

Blue Plains Wastewater Treatment Plant

Governance

An eleven-member Board of Directors governs DC Water. The District is represented by six Board Members. Prince George's County and Montgomery County each have two Board Members. Fairfax County has a single Board Member. Each participating jurisdiction is a signatory to the Blue Plains Intermunicipal Agreement, which spells out the roles and responsibilities for each party, and addresses facilities management, capacity allocation and financing.[7]

The Authority develops its own budget. which is then included in the overall District of Columbia budget. Together these two budgets are presented annually to Congress for approval.

When DC Water was created as an independent authority in 1996, its finances were separate from those of the District of Columbia. The independence of DC Water with regard to finance, procurement and personnel matters was affirmed by Congress under the District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority Independence Preservation Act of 2008.[8]

Operations

A General Manager is responsible for all daily operations and reports to the DC Water Board of Directors.

DC Water purchases drinking water from the Washington Aqueduct division of the Army Corps of Engineers. The Aqueduct sources the water from the Potomac River at Great Falls and Little Falls, north of the District. The Aqueduct treats the water and DC Water distributes it through 1,300 miles (2,100 km) of water pipes throughout the District of Columbia.

DC Water also manages 1,900 miles (3,100 km) of sewer lines and operates the Blue Plains Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant.[9] The plant discharges to the Potomac River at the southernmost tip of the District.

Awards

The National Association of Clean Water Agencies (NACWA) honored DC Water with its Research and Technology Award, given annually to member agencies who contribute to the field of biosolids usage and disposal or wastewater treatment. The research project must be completed in-house (or by a contractor working directly with the agency) and it must relate to the collection process, treatment process, or reuse of wastewater. This innovation by the DC Water team has global impact in protecting aquatic life in waterways that receive wastewater discharges. The year 2010 marks the second consecutive year that DC Water has been recognized with this award.[10]

In 2010, DC Water received from NACWA the Platinum Peak Performance Award after receiving five consecutive Gold Awards for 100 percent compliance with permit limits. This Award is presented to member agencies for exceptional compliance for their National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit limits.[11]

Funding

Rates paid by ratepayers cover the cost of delivery of water and sewer service. A little more than half of the rates cover operations. Another quarter covers the cost of capital projects like replacement of aging water and sewer lines, valve replacements and pump station improvements. Capital projects also include several projects designed to protect the environment, and are required by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Though the mandate comes from the federal government, the funding sources for these construction projects are not identified. While a small amount of funding has come through the Clean Water Act and Safe Drinking Water Act and other grants, the majority of these capital costs are borne by the ratepayers.[12]

Environmental stewardship

At Blue Plains, wastewater treatment goes beyond primary and secondary treatment levels, to tertiary (or advanced) treatment. The effluent that leaves Blue Plains and is discharged to the Potomac is highly treated and meets some of the most stringent NPDES permit limits in the United States.

Historically, wastewater treatment plants have contributed nutrients such as phosphorus and nitrogen to the waterways in which they discharge. These nutrients have been found to deplete oxygen in the marine environment, a process that is detrimental to fish and other aquatic life.

Since the mid-1980s, Blue Plains has reduced phosphorus to the limit of technology, primarily in support of water quality goals of the Potomac River, but also for the restoration of the Chesapeake Bay. The Chesapeake Bay Agreement, reached in 1987, was a first step in reducing nitrogen discharge to waterways that are tributary to the Chesapeake Bay. Under the agreement, the Bay states and the District committed to voluntarily reduce nitrogen loads by 40 percent from their 1985 levels. Blue Plains was the first plant to achieve that goal. Furthermore, in every year since the full-scale implementation of the Biological Nitrogen Removal (BNR) process was completed in 2000, Blue Plains has every year successfully achieved and exceeded that goal of a 40 percent reduction. In Fiscal Year 2009, the BNR process at Blue Plains reduced the nitrogen load by more than 58 percent.[13]

DC Water and EPA agreed upon new nitrogen limits as part of the NPDES permit. effective September 2010. reducing nitrogen levels to 4.7 million pounds per year. DC Water plans to achieve these levels by constructing new facilities at Blue Plains to perform enhanced nitrogen removal (ENR). The total cost of the project is nearly $1 billion.[14]

In FY 09, the Authority rehabilitated pumping equipment and accessories in one of two stations that pump incoming wastewater into the plant and replaced aged infrastructure and equipment in the plant’s final filters with a more effective system. All the upgrade projects were tied into the plant-wide process control system (PCS), which monitors and controls the plant’s processes from a central location.

Progress was achieved in implementing the nitrification/denitrification facilities upgrade to convert nitrification reactors from coarse to fine bubble diffusion and to modify structures and equipment. The rehabilitated and new equipment will support other ongoing upgrades to the nitrification/denitrification process, and aims to meet the nitrogen reduction goals of the Chesapeake Bay Program. It will also increase energy efficiency.

On the waterways, the Authority operates two skimmer boats that remove floatable debris from the Anacostia and Potomac rivers every Monday through Friday. These crews remove more than 400 tons of trash from our waterways each year.

Plastic bottles, plastic bags, inflatable toys, baseballs and environmental debris like tree limbs, are all skimmed from the waterways and deposited into oversized dumpsters for removal. In decades past, there used to be larger items, such as sofas and refrigerators. But over the years, the skimmer boats have removed most of those. Still, there is the occasional unlikely item, such as the live deer that was recently rescued to dry ground.

In addition to their full-time work assignments, these crews clean the way for special events like the Nation’s Triathlon and high school crew competitions, as well as for conservation efforts.

As a result of the work DC Water contributes, “The District, as a city, is head and shoulders above any other municipality in the Bay watershed,” said Tom Schueler of the nonprofit Chesapeake Stormwater Network. In 2009, The Stormwater Network developed a stormwater performance grading scale in which the District received the highest grade of B+ and others went on score as low as Cs and even Ds.[15]

DC Water Clean Rivers Project

The District of Columbia is one of 772 older cities in the country with a combined sewer system. The combined sewer system covers about a third of the city, and was built in the late 19th century to carry both sanitary sewage and storm water in the same pipe. The system operates well in dry weather. However, during rainstorms, the flow can exceed the capacity of the pipe. To prevent sewer backups and flooded streets, these combined sewers may discharge into the Anacostia and Potomac Rivers and Rock Creek, a phenomenon known as combined sewer overflows (CSOs).

To date, DC Water has significantly reduced CSOs by eliminating approximately 40 percent of the overflows through a $140 million program. This investment included inflatable dams to catch and store overflows during rain storms; tide gates to keep river water from flowing into the sewer system; sewer separation to eliminate CSO outfalls; and pumping station construction and rehabilitation to increase flow capacity. A deep underground tunnel system is employed in a $2.4 billion, 20-year DC Water Clean Rivers Project to reduce CSOs by 96 percent overall and 98 percent in the Anacostia River.

This tunnel system will store the combined sewage during wet weather and release it for treatment at Blue Plains once there is capacity in the system.[13]

Controversy

For more details on lead contamination in the early 2000s, see Lead contamination in Washington, D.C. drinking water and Marc Edwards (civil engineering professor).

In 2001, water supplied by the Authority was found to contain lead levels of at least 1,250 parts per billion (ppb)—about 83 times higher than the accepted safe level of 15 ppb.[16] The discovery was made by Marc Edwards, a civil engineering professor specializing in plumbing who DC Water had hired to investigate complaints of plumbing corrosion. DC Water threatened to cut off Edwards's funding unless he abandoned his investigation.[17] The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) released a report dismissing the idea of health risks from the water.[18]

The story was picked up by the Washington Post, which ran front-page stories about the problem in January 2004.[17] This led to a Congressional investigation, which found that the CDC had made "scientifically indefensible" claims about the lack of health effects from the lead in DC's water supply.[19]

The problem was traced to the Washington Aqueduct decision to replace the chlorine used to treat the water with chloramine, a similar chemical.[17] Chloramine picks up lead from pipes and solder, keeping it dissolved in the water throughout the system.[20]

In 2010, the CDC said that 15,000 homes in the DC area might still have water supplies with dangerous levels of lead.[21]

See also

References

  1. ↑ "2009 Annual Report" (PDF). DC Water. Retrieved August 25, 2010.
  2. ↑ Harry C. Ways, "The Washington Aqueduct: 1852-1992." (Baltimore, MD: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Baltimore District, 1996)
  3. ↑ DC Water (2011). "History of Our Water System."
  4. ↑ Wennersten, John R. (2008). Anacostia: The Death and Life of an American River. Baltimore: The Chesapeake Book Company
  5. ↑ "District of Columbia Official Code -- DC ST 1981 § 43-1661". 2001.
  6. ↑ "History of the Blue Plains Wastewater Treatment Plant". DC Water. Retrieved 2015-06-21.
  7. ↑ DC Water. "Blue Plains Intermunicipal Agreement.
  8. ↑ District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority Independence Preservation Act, Pub.L. 110–273, 122 Stat. 2491, approved 2008-07-15.
  9. ↑ U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Philadelphia, PA (2010). "Blue Plains - Final Permit."
  10. ↑ "Research and Technology Award". NACWA. 2010. Retrieved September 1, 2010.
  11. ↑ "Platinum Peak Award". NACWA. 2010. Retrieved September 1, 2010.
  12. ↑ "Rates and Metering". DC Water. 2009. Retrieved April 20, 2010.
  13. 1 2 "Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) Control Activities Update" (PDF). DC Water. October 2009. Retrieved August 25, 2010.
  14. ↑ "Capital Improvement Program Update" (PDF). DC Water. 2009. Retrieved April 20, 2010.
  15. ↑ "D.C. Set to Tunnel Its Way Out of Sewage Overflows". Bay Journal. May 2010. Retrieved September 1, 2010.
  16. ↑ August, Melissa (April 12, 2004). "The Plumbing Professor: getting the lead out". Time (New York: Time). Retrieved June 15, 2011.
  17. 1 2 3 Home-Douglas, Pierre (November 2004). "The Water Guy". Prism (American Society for Engineering Education) 14 (3). Retrieved June 15, 2011.
  18. ↑ Renner, Rebecca (April 10, 2009). "Health agency covered up lead harm". Salon. Salon Media Group. Retrieved June 15, 2011.
  19. ↑ Leonnig, Carol D. (May 20, 2010). "CDC misled District residents about lead levels in water, House probe finds". The Washington Post (Washington, DC). Retrieved June 15, 2011.
  20. ↑ Zacher, Jason (April 6, 2004). "Disinfectant linked to lead in D.C. used in Greenville". The Greenville News (Greenville, SC). p. A1.
  21. ↑ Brown, David (December 11, 2010). "Study of D.C. water sharpens understanding of lead threat". The Washington Post. Retrieved June 15, 2011.

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Saturday, April 09, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.