Double seam

A double seam is the closure between a can body and a can end (or lid).

Originally, the can end was soldered or welded onto the can body after the can was filled.[1] However, this introduced a variety of issues, such as foreign contaminants (including lead and other harmful heavy metals). The double seam was later developed as a cheaper and safer alternative and quickly replaced the welded seam.

The double seam is made using a double seamer, which can have just one or a number of heads or seaming stations. The double seam is formed by mechanically interlocking five layers of material together: three layers of the can end and two layers of the can body. Each seaming head typically consists of two rolls, a first operation roll and second operation roll, and a chuck. Some seaming machines have two first operation rolls and two second operation rolls and a few machines use a method called "rail seaming" which requires no rolls. During the seaming operation, the can end is lowered on to the filled can body and held down by the chuck, which acts as an anvil to the seaming operation. The first operation roll then engages the can end against the can body thereby folding the end curl around the flange of the body. In some seaming machines, this is done as the can is turning at high speed. In other seaming machines, the can is stationary and the first operation roll (or rolls) spins around several times to ensure a complete first operation. After the first operation is complete, the first operation roll disengages from the can and the second operation roll then engages the can. The purpose of the second operation is to iron out the double seam into its final shape and remove the voids between the layers of can and end material. In practice, ironing out all of the can and end material in a double seam without leaving some voids is impossible without the use of a sealing compound.

Defects

The production of a high-quality double seam is dependent on several factors, including conformity to the set can and end specifications, the quality of the seamer tooling used and its compliance with the can and end being used, the condition of the seaming machine and the setup of the seaming rolls, lifter pressure and other components. When the machinery is set up correctly and the incoming materials (cans, ends, tooling, etc.) comply to the set specifications, the result should be[2] ideal first and second operation seams.

A problem in any one of these factors and others can contribute to seam defects that have an adverse effect on the ability of the can to withstand foreign contamination and keep the product from leaking or reduce its shelf life. Below is a list that can be used as a reference.[3]

Government regulations

In the United States, the production and quality of double seams is regulated by the US Department of Health and Human Services - Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Department of Agriculture (USDA). The plant's responsibility towards the government depends on the product being canned. The FDA regulates all components of canning low acid canned foods, including handling of empty containers, glass, metal and plastic containers.[4] The USDA regulates canning of animal products.[5]

US FDA regulations regarding low acid canned food

Before regulating inspection procedures and frequencies, the regulation pertaining to double seams establishes the terminology, explains how a seam is formed and lists the possible double seam defects.

Responsibility for the quality of the double seam

The regulation states that the can manufacturer is responsible for providing the can filler with guidelines and specifications for the can seam: "Can seam guidelines (specifications) are provided to the low acid canned food manufacturer by the supplier of the container and end being used. The guidelines detail the measurements, in thousands of an inch, of each attribute of the double seam for both the first and second seaming operations. They also provide a set-up aim or ideal starting dimensions for the set up of the seamer. The operating limits set the range for good practice." While specifying these guidelines is important, the plant is responsible for the double seam quality: "It is extremely important to understand that seam guidelines by themselves cannot be used for determining the quality of a double seam. The seam guidelines are to be used in setting up the double seams initially and maintaining seam integrity during production. Final acceptability of the double seam should be based on total evaluation of the seam by a qualified person and not on dimensions alone. Good seaming practice requires constant visual examination, frequently scheduled tear-down evaluation, machine maintenance, and immediate correction of unacceptable conditions." The regulation also states that if the double seams do not meet the guidelines, the can filler plant "must know what steps to take to correct the condition".

Critical seam parameters

Since there are several parameters that can be used to judge seam quality, the FDA regulation specifies the most critical parameters: "The most critical attributes to consider in judging the quality of the double seam are overlap and tightness (wrinkle). If one of the can seam measurements (i.e., body hook) is slightly beyond the specified guidelines but the rest of the seam is evaluated and the overlap and tightness (wrinkle) are within specified guidelines, then adjustments to the seamer can be made at the next scheduled shut-down. In this instance, the manufacturer should identify the out-of-guideline measurement and document they have evaluated the rest of the double seam, but did not find immediate corrective action necessary. However, if overlap measurement or tightness rating evaluation are below the minimum guidelines a resample from the questionable seaming station should be made. If the resample continues to show out-of-guideline measurements in overlap and/or wrinkle the machine should be stopped and adjusted."

Evaluation requirements - non-destructive testing

The FDA regulations specifies the frequency and requirements of non-destructive testing: "21 CFR Part 113.60(a) requires a visual examination of at least 1 can per seaming head by a qualified container closure inspector at intervals of sufficient frequency. The regulation requires that double seamed containers be visually inspected for gross closure defects such as sharp seams, cut-overs, deadheads, false seams, droops and broken chuck. The frequency of the visual examination should be made at intervals not to exceed 30 minutes (of operational time); and additional visual examinations must be performed immediately following a jam in a closing machine, after closing machine adjustment, or after startup of a machine following a prolonged shut-down. An example of a prolonged shut down may be when the plant ceases production at 6:00 PM and restarts production at 8:00 AM the next day."

Evaluation requirements - destructive testing

The FDA continues by detailing the requirements of double seam destructive testing: "The double seam teardown examination is a destructive test. Tools that are used to perform this test include a seam micrometer, countersink gauge can opener and nippers. Optional equipment for seam teardown examinations include a seam saw, seam projector and seam scope. Although it is not imperative the investigator carry this equipment to each LACF inspection, it is very important that they know how to operate this equipment and read measurements from the micrometer, seam projector or seam scope. It is also important that the investigator know how to determine the tightness or wrinkle rating of the cover hook. Knowledge of the procedures used to perform double seam teardown examination are essential to evaluating the firm's knowledge and ability to do this examination. Attachment 14 explains the procedure for using a seam projector for examining a cross section of the seam. Attachment 15 explains the can seam micrometer and procedure for use, and Attachment 16 explains the use of a seamscope for the same exam.

The requirements for double seam examinations are specified in 21 CFR Part 113.60(a)(1). The regulation states that teardown examinations shall be performed by a trained closure technician at intervals of sufficient frequency to ensure proper closure. The teardown examinations shall be made on the packer's end double seams on at least one can from each seaming head to ensure maintenance of seam integrity. Sufficient frequency is defined in the regulation as intervals not to exceed 4 hours (operational time).

The regulation allows for two different methods of double seam examination; the "micrometer" method or the "optical" method.

If the processor is using the micrometer method the regulation requires that three measurements are taken at points approximately 120° apart around the double seam. On three-piece cans the first measurement can be taken directly across from the side seam and the next two measurements are then taken 120° to either side of the first measurement. On three-piece cans the measurements must be taken at least one-half inch from the side seam juncture as the juncture may interfere with a true seam measurement.

Micrometer measurements are made and recorded in thousandths of an inch. The high and low measurements are recorded on the double seam teardown examination record. If the manufacturer is using the micrometer method the required measurements are:

Optional measurements are:

The regulation specifies the formula used to calculate overlap when micrometer measurements are used:

Measurements used to calculate the overlap should not be averaged. In fact, the lowest values should be used to determine the worst-case scenario. For example, to calculate the worst-case scenario you should use the lowest measurements for CH and BH and the highest measurements for W.

If a seam scope or seam projector is used (optical method) to make the seam measurements, the required measurements are:

Optional measurements are:

Evaluation - typical procedures

There are several different "customs" to evaluate double seams:

  1. Traditional teardown. Although pretty rare, in this case the external measurements are made (usually consisting of seam length, seam thickness and countersink). Internal parameters are evaluated by tearing down the seam, then measuring the cover hook and body hook parameters mechanically. Then, various calculations are made to evaluate overlap. This procedure is generally considered bad form as it does not evaluate all the seam parameters on the same exact point, which can lead to missing serious defects (including false seams).
  2. Seam projector, or seam scope. Originally built as projection systems, operators would cut the cans and project a magnification of the image onto a projector screen. Seam scopes and seam analysis systems digitize this and move the measurement method to a computer screen. Fully automatic double seam inspection systems extend this further by adding automatic detection to the various measurement points on the seam. In some cases, three cuts are made on a particular can. In others, a single cut is made, while external measurements (length, thickness, countersink) are evaluated using dedicated calipers or gauges. In addition, a wrinkle teardown is made (either from the same can, if one cut was made - or a separate can if three cuts were made).
  3. X-ray systems. These systems utilize X-ray technology to either provide an image from the side of the seam (comparable to double seam projector images) or from the top. X-ray systems are also capable of measuring the Cover Hook Wrinkle without damaging the can - this can provide an objective result in contrast to the subjective operator's visual assessment.
  4. 360 Seam measurement systems. These systems are used as a complementary method to try and locate problems in cans non-destructively by evaluating them 360 degrees around the can (usually measuring seam thickness and/or seam length).

References

  1. "Complete History of the Can". Can Manufacturers Institute. Retrieved 10 October 2012.
  2. "Double Seam Defects". ShoreLine PPM. Retrieved 11 October 2012.
  3. "US FDA - Guide to Inspections of Low Acid Canned Food Manufacturers: Part 3". US Food and Drug Administration. Retrieved 17 October 2012.
  4. "USDA - 9 CFR 381.301 - Containers and Closures" (PDF). US Department of Agriculture. Retrieved 17 October 2012.

See Also

Canning

http://www.canseamers.com/iseamproblems.htm - Images of 5-layer seal and common defect patterns

1956 American Can Co Video: "The Miracle of the Can" (start=23m49s) - video explanation of double seem construction.

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Saturday, June 20, 2015. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.