Ecological speciation

European Holly (Ilex aquifolium). The genus Ilex is an example of ecological speciation.
Gasterosteus aculeatus, a documented case of ecological speciation
Centaurea solstitialis, a candidate species for incipient ecological speciation

Ecological speciation is the process by which ecologically based divergent selection between different environments leads to the creation of reproductive barriers between populations.[1] This is often the result of selection over traits which are genetically correlated to reproductive isolation, thus speciation occurs as a by-product of adaptive divergence.[2][3]

Ecological selection is "the interaction of individuals with their environment during resource acquisition".[4] Natural selection is inherently involved in the process of speciation, whereby, "under ecological speciation, populations in different environments, or populations exploiting different resources, experience contrasting natural selection pressures on the traits that directly or indirectly bring about the evolution of reproductive isolation".[5] Evidence for the role ecology plays in the process of speciation exists. Studies of stickleback populations support ecologically-linked speciation arising as a by-product,[6] alongside numerous studies of parallel speciation—of which, substantiates speciation's occurrence in nature.

The key difference between ecological speciation and other kinds of speciation, is that it is triggered by divergent natural selection among different habitats, as opposed to other kinds of speciation processes, like random genetic drift, the fixation of incompatible mutations in populations experiencing similar selective pressures, or various forms of sexual selection not involving selection on ecologically relevant traits. Ecological speciation can occur either in allopatry, sympatry, or parapatry. The only requirement being that speciation occurs as a result of adaptation to different ecological or micro-ecological conditions.[1]

Some debate exists over the framework concerning the delineation of whether a speciation event is ecological or nonecological. "The pervasive effect of selection suggests that adaptive evolution and speciation are inseparable, casting doubt on whether speciation is ever nonecological".[7]

Parallel speciation

Parallel speciation is where "greater reproductive isolation repeatedly evolves between independent populations adapting to contrasting environments than between independent populations adapting to similar environments".[8] It is established that ecological speciation occurs and with much of the evidence, "...accumulated from top-down studies of adaptation and reproductive isolation".[8]

Research and supporting evidence

Known examples of ecological speciation include three-spined stickleback fishes, distinct species of which emerged as the result to adaptation of different conditions along water depth clines in freshwater lakes.[9] Ancestors of the genus Ilex (holly) became isolated from the remaining Ilex when the Earth mass broke away into Gondwana and Laurasia about 82 million years ago, resulting in a physical separation of the groups (allopatry) and beginning a process of change to adapt to new conditions; over time survivor species of the holly genus adapted to different ecological niches. The invasive weed species Centaurea solstitialis is a candidate to be a case of incipient ecological speciation; in less than 200 years, incipient reproductive isolation appeared as a result to adaptation to different ecological conditions between native and non-native ranges.[10][11]

Mosquito fish

Parallel speciation occurs for example in mosquito fish in the Bahamas, where Gambusia fish inhabit "blue holes"—carbonate caves and depressions flooded with water throughout the islands. Some of the holes contain the piscivorous predator fish Gobiomorus dormitor, while others have no major predators (excluding birds). The authors of the study tested for ecological speciation by measuring three different data sets: morphological data (to test for divergent natural selection), molecular data (to test for "replicated trait evolution in independent populations" with similar phenotypes), and mate-choice trials (to test for reproductive isolation between "ecologically divergent pairs of populations than ecologically similar ones": a by-product resulting from divergent traits). The study allowed for a natural experiment to test the effects of predator-mediated natural selection and it's by-product: ecological speciation. The results suggested a "strong confirmation of the ecological speciation hypothesis" and amply supported parallel speciation taking place within the different blue holes.[12]

Skinks

Another example is in skinks, where the Plestiodon genus (formerly Eumeces) has a complex evolutionary history with ecological speciation and parallel speciation of the three species (within two morphotypes): E. skiltonianus and E. lagunensis, and E. gilberti. E. gilberti occupies dry, low-elevation habitats, has a larger body size, and uniform, solid color scales. The other two species inhabit higher-elevation regions, have smaller bodies, and exhibit colored stripes. The members of the group have similar phenotypic stages during early development but differ in their morphology in later stages. A phylogenetic analysis using mtDNA of the entire group, (including all species and subspecies of the Eumeces group inhabiting the western United States) combined with comparative approaches to morphology, and geographic distribution showed "instances of parallel morphological evolution...and provide evidence that this system is consistent with a model of ecological speciation" due to "the similarity in early ontogenetic trajectories and the close association between differences in body size and color pattern[s]" of each morphotype.[13]

See also

References

  1. 1 2 Nosil, P. (2012). Ecological Speciation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 280. ISBN 978-0199587117.
  2. Mayr, E. (1942). Systematics and the origin of species from the viewpoint of a zoologist. New York: Columbia University Press. p. 337. ISBN 0-674-86250-3.
  3. Mayr, E. (1947). "Ecological factors in speciation.". Evolution 1: 263–288. doi:10.2307/2405327.
  4. Howard D. Rundle and Patrik Nosil (2005), "Ecological speciation", Ecology Letters 8: 336–352, doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00715.x
  5. Dolph Schluter (2001), "Ecology and the origin of species", Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16 (7)
  6. Jeffrey S. McKinnon; et al. (2004), "Evidence for ecology’s role in speciation", Nature 429: 294–298, doi:10.1038/nature02556
  7. James M. Sobel; et al. (2009), "The Biology of Speciation", Evolution 64 (2): 295–315
  8. 1 2 Dolph Schluter (2009), "Evidence for Ecological Speciation and Its Alternative", Science 326: 737–740
  9. Behm, J. E., A. R. Ives and J. W. Boughman. 2010. "Breakdown in postmating isolation and the collapse of a species pair through hybridization" American Naturalist 175:11–26.
  10. Montesinos, D., Santiago, G., & Callaway, R. M. (2012). Neo-allopatry and rapid reproductive isolation. The American Naturalist, 180(4), 529–33.
  11. Graebner, R. C., Callaway, R. M., & Montesinos, D. (2012). Invasive species grows faster, competes better, and shows greater evolution toward increased seed size and growth than exotic non-invasive congeners. Plant Ecology, 213(4), 545–553.
  12. R. Brian Langerhans; et al. (2007), "Ecological Speciation in Gambusia Fishes", Evolution 61 (9): 2054–2074
  13. Jonathan Q. Richmond & Tod W. Reeder (2002), "Evidence for Parallel Ecological Speciation in Scincid Lizards of the Eumeces skiltonianus Species Group (Squamata: Scincidae)", Evolution 56 (7): 1498–1513
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Monday, April 11, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.