Efficient Taxation of Income

Taxation in the United States of America
This article is part of a series on

Federal taxation Alternative minimum tax Capital gains tax Corporate tax Estate tax Excise tax Gift tax Income tax Payroll tax Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Internal Revenue Code (IRC) IRS tax forms Revenue by state History Constitutional authority Taxpayer standing Court Protest Evasion
State and local taxation State income tax Property tax Sales tax Use tax Land value tax State tax levels
Federal tax reform Automated payment transaction tax 9–9–9 Competitive Tax Plan Efficient Taxation of Income FairTax Flat tax Hall–Rabushka flat tax Kemp Commission Taxpayer Choice Act USA Tax Value added tax
United States portal

The Efficient Taxation of Income is an approach to taxation that would apply different tax rates for property-type income and earned income from work. Earned income would be taxed at a flat rate of 10%, while property-type income would be taxed at 30%. The plan was created by Dale Jorgenson, Samuel W. Morris University Professor at Harvard University, and Kun-Young Yun, Professor of Economics at Yonsei University, Korea.^[1] Jorgenson states that the plan would provide big gains in economic efficiency that would result from making the tax treatment of income from corporate, non-corporate and household property the same.^[2] The plan has been discussed before the United States Congress but a bill has not been introduced.^[3]

Under Efficient Taxation of Income, each dollar of new business investment would generate a credit against taxes on business income. The rates for these credits would make tax burdens on all income sources the same. Taxes on new investments by households would be collected by car dealers, real estate developers, and other providers. These would not apply to existing home owners and would protect property values. Jorgenson states that the Efficient Taxation of Income could be implemented without cumbersome transition rules. In the United States, the tax treatment of Social Security and Medicare contributions and benefits would be unaffected, as would the treatment of private pension plans. Jorgenson estimates that the total one-off gain from Efficient Taxation of Income in the U.S. would be $4,900 billion, while adoption of the Flat Tax would yield only $2,060 billion.^[4] The gains underscore the benefits of shifting investment to higher-yielding assets and reflect greater investment and faster economic growth.

Notes

↑ Jorgenson, Dale; Yun, Kun-Young (2002-11-15). "Efficient Taxation of Income" (PDF). Harvard. Retrieved 2007-07-17.
↑ Jorgenson, Dale (2002-06-18). "A Smarter Type of Tax". Financial Times. Archived from the original on 2007-02-13. Retrieved 2007-07-17.
↑ Jorgenson, Dale (2002-05-09). "Hearing on the Extraterritorial Income Regime". House Committee on Ways and Means. Retrieved 2007-07-18.
↑ Jorgenson, Dale (2003-04). "Efficient Taxation of Income". Harvard Magazine. Retrieved 2007-07-17. Check date values in: |date= (help)

References

Jorgenson, Dale; Yun, Kun-Young (2002). Investment, Vol. 3: Lifting the Burden: Tax Reform, the Cost of Capital, and U.S. Economic Growth (Hardcover ed.). The MIT Press. ISBN 0-262-10091-6.

External links

Jorgenson's Harvard biography

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Friday, February 26, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.

Efficient Taxation of Income

See also

Notes

References

External links