Eight-vertex model
In statistical mechanics, the eight-vertex model is a generalisation of the ice-type (six-vertex) models; it was discussed by Sutherland,[1] and Fan & Wu,[2] and solved by Baxter in the zero-field case.[3]
Description
As with the ice-type models, the eight-vertex model is a square lattice model, where each state is a configuration of arrows at a vertex. The allowed vertices have an even number of arrows pointing towards the vertex; these include the six inherited from the ice-type model (1-6), and sinks and sources (7, 8).

We consider a  lattice, with
 lattice, with  vertices and
 vertices and  edges. Imposing periodic boundary conditions requires that the states 7 and 8 occur equally often, as do states 5 and 6, and thus can be taken to have the same energy. For the zero-field case the same is true for the two other pairs of states. Each vertex
 edges. Imposing periodic boundary conditions requires that the states 7 and 8 occur equally often, as do states 5 and 6, and thus can be taken to have the same energy. For the zero-field case the same is true for the two other pairs of states. Each vertex  has an associated energy
 has an associated energy  and Boltzmann weight
 and Boltzmann weight  , giving the partition function over the lattice as
, giving the partition function over the lattice as
where the summation is over all allowed configurations of vertices in the lattice. In this general form the partition function remains unsolved.
Solution in the zero-field case
The zero-field case of the model corresponds physically to the absence of external electric fields. Hence, the model remains unchanged under the reversal of all arrows; the states 1 and 2, and 3 and 4, consequently must occur as pairs. The vertices can be assigned arbitrary weights
The solution is based on the observation that rows in transfer matrices commute, for a certain parametrisation of these four Boltzmann weights. This came about as a modification of an alternate solution for the six-vertex model; it makes use of elliptic theta functions.
Commuting transfer matrices
The proof relies on the fact that when  and
 and  , for quantities
, for quantities 
the transfer matrices  and
 and  (associated with the weights
 (associated with the weights  ,
,  ,
,  ,
,  and
 and  ,
,  ,
,  ,
,  ) commute. Using the star-triangle relation, Baxter reformulated this condition as equivalent to a parametrisation of the weights given as
) commute. Using the star-triangle relation, Baxter reformulated this condition as equivalent to a parametrisation of the weights given as
for fixed modulus  and
 and  and variable
 and variable  . Here snh is the hyperbolic analogue of sn, given by
. Here snh is the hyperbolic analogue of sn, given by
and  and
 and  are Jacobi elliptic functions of modulus
 are Jacobi elliptic functions of modulus  . The associated transfer matrix
. The associated transfer matrix  thus is a function of
 thus is a function of  alone; for all
 alone; for all  ,
, 
The matrix function 
The other crucial part of the solution is the existence of a nonsingular matrix-valued function  , such that for all complex
, such that for all complex  the matrices
 the matrices  commute with each other and the transfer matrices, and satisfy
 commute with each other and the transfer matrices, and satisfy
- 
 (1) 
where
The existence and commutation relations of such a function are demonstrated by considering pair propagations through a vertex, and periodicity relations of the theta functions, in a similar way to the six-vertex model.
Explicit solution
The commutation of matrices in (1) allow them to be diagonalised, and thus eigenvalues can be found. The partition function is calculated from the maximal eigenvalue, resulting in a free energy per site of
for
where  and
 and  are the complete elliptic integrals of moduli
 are the complete elliptic integrals of moduli  and
 and  .
The eight vertex model was also solved in quasicrystals.
.
The eight vertex model was also solved in quasicrystals.
Equivalence with an Ising model
There is a natural correspondence between the eight-vertex model, and the Ising model with 2-spin and 4-spin nearest neighbour interactions. The states of this model are spins  on faces of a square lattice. The analogue of 'edges' in the eight-vertex model are products of spins on adjacent faces:
 on faces of a square lattice. The analogue of 'edges' in the eight-vertex model are products of spins on adjacent faces:

The most general form of the energy for this model is
where  ,
,  ,
,  ,
,  describe the horizontal, vertical and two diagonal 2-spin interactions, and
 describe the horizontal, vertical and two diagonal 2-spin interactions, and  describes the 4-spin interaction between four faces at a vertex; the sum is over the whole lattice.
 describes the 4-spin interaction between four faces at a vertex; the sum is over the whole lattice.

We denote horizontal and vertical spins (arrows on edges) in the eight-vertex model  ,
,  respectively, and define up and right as positive directions. The restriction on vertex states is that the product of four edges at a vertex is 1; this automatically holds for Ising 'edges'. Each
 respectively, and define up and right as positive directions. The restriction on vertex states is that the product of four edges at a vertex is 1; this automatically holds for Ising 'edges'. Each  configuration then corresponds to a unique
 configuration then corresponds to a unique   ,
,  configuration, whereas each
 configuration, whereas each   ,
,  configuration gives two choices of
 configuration gives two choices of  configurations.
 configurations. 
Equating general forms of Boltzmann weights for each vertex  , the following relations between the
, the following relations between the  and
 and  ,
,  ,
,  ,
,  ,
,  define the correspondence between the lattice models:
 define the correspondence between the lattice models:
It follows that in the zero-field case of the eight-vertex model, the horizontal and vertical interactions in the corresponding Ising model vanish.
These relations gives the equivalence  between the partition functions of the eight-vertex model, and the 2,4-spin Ising model. Consequently a solution in either model would lead immediately to a solution in the other.
 between the partition functions of the eight-vertex model, and the 2,4-spin Ising model. Consequently a solution in either model would lead immediately to a solution in the other.
See also
Notes
References
- Baxter, Rodney J. (1982), Exactly solved models in statistical mechanics (PDF), London: Academic Press Inc. [Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers], ISBN 978-0-12-083180-7, MR 690578






![\begin{align}
\zeta(u)&=[c^{-1}H(2\eta)\Theta(u-\eta)\Theta(u+\eta)]^N\\
\phi(u)&=[\Theta(0)H(u)\Theta(u)]^N.
\end{align}](../I/m/01de1194902918cdf252efb02f53d90e.png)




