Eleanor Robson

For the actress and philanthropist, see Eleanor Robson Belmont.

Eleanor Robson is a Professor of Ancient Near Eastern History at the Department of History, University College London, chair of the British Institute for the Study of Iraq and a Quondam Fellow of All Souls College, Oxford.[1]

Robson is the author or co-author of several books on Mesopotamian culture and the history of mathematics. In 2003, she won the Lester R. Ford Award of the Mathematical Association of America for her work on Plimpton 322, a clay tablet of Babylonian mathematics; contrary to previous theories according to which this tablet represented a table of Pythagorean triples, Robson showed that it could have been a collection of school exercises in solving quadratic equations.[2][3][4][5] She has also been widely quoted for her criticism of the U.S. Government's failure to prevent looting at the National Museum of Iraq during the Iraq War in 2003.[6][7][8][9]

Books

References

  1. http://www.all-souls.ox.ac.uk/people.php?cat=6&people_title=Former%20Fellows, All Souls College, retrieved 2011-10-02.
  2. MAA Writing Awards, retrieved 2010-03-12.
  3. Powell, Eric (May 1, 2001), "Math homework 4,000 years ago", Discover Magazine.
  4. "Reassessing an ancient artifact", Science News, January 27, 2001.
  5. "Random Samples", Science 291 (5508), February 23, 2001: 1481, doi:10.1126/science.291.5508.1481a |contribution= ignored (help).
  6. "Verbatim: Apr. 28, 2003", Time Magazine, April 28, 2003.
  7. Jehl, Douglas; Becker, Elizabeth (April 16, 2003), "Experts' Pleas to Pentagon Didn't Save Museum", New York Times.
  8. Johnson, Chalmers (July 9, 2005), "The smash of civilizations", Asia Times.
  9. Fisher, Mark (January 19, 2006), "Tomb raiders", The Guardian.
  10. Review by K.-B. Gundlach (2001), Mathematical Reviews, MR 1735671.
  11. Review by Leo Depuydt (2003) in Journal of Near Eastern Studies 62 (3): 231–232, doi:10.1086/380342.
  12. Review by Peggy Aldrich Kidwell (2004), Technology and Culture 45 (3): 662–664, doi:10.1353/tech.2004.0136.
  13. Review by T. M. Porter (2005), Historia Mathematica 32 (1): 98–99, doi:10.1016/j.hm.2004.07.001.
  14. Review by A. R. George (2005), Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain & Ireland (Third Series) 15: 219–220, doi:10.1017/S1356186305215262.
  15. Review by Daniel Shoup (2006), European Journal of Archaeology 9 (2–3): 298–300, doi:10.1177/14619571060090020706.
  16. Review by Victor J. Katz (2009), Mathematical Reviews, MR 2440977.
  17. Review by Duncan J. Melville (2009), Historia Mathematica 36 (4): 428–433, doi:10.1016/j.hm.2009.07.013.
  18. Review by Frank J. Swetz (2008), Loci, doi:10.4169/loci003211.
  19. Review by Jens Høyrup (2009), The Mathematical Intelligencer, doi:10.1007/s00283-009-9097-z.
  20. Review by Hardy Grant (2010), Historia Mathematica 37 (1): 112–118, doi:10.1016/j.hm.2009.09.002.

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Monday, March 21, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.