Elias Bassalygo bound
The Elias-Bassalygo bound is a mathematical limit used in coding theory for error correction during data transmission or communications. The properties of the Elias-Bassalygo bound are defined, below, using mathematical expressions.
Definition
Let  be a
 be a  -ary code of length
-ary code of length  , i.e. a subset of
, i.e. a subset of ![[q]^n](../I/m/fd56f53f413fd36b409cfdc732be355d.png) . (Each
. (Each  -ary block code of length
-ary block code of length  is a subset of the strings of
 is a subset of the strings of  where the alphabet set
 where the alphabet set  has
 has  elements). Let
 elements). Let  be the rate of
 be the rate of  and
 and  (delta) be the relative distance.
 (delta) be the relative distance.   
Let ![B_q(\boldsymbol{y}, \rho n) =\{ \boldsymbol{x} \in [q]^n | \Delta(\boldsymbol{x}, \boldsymbol{y}) \le \rho n \}](../I/m/4da5d701b8060ba2f508d7f59e3c3b02.png) be the Hamming ball of radius
 be the Hamming ball of radius  centered at
 centered at  .  Let
.  Let  be the volume of the Hamming ball of radius
 be the volume of the Hamming ball of radius  .  It is obvious that the volume of a Hamming Ball is translation-invariant, i.e. irrelevant with position of
.  It is obvious that the volume of a Hamming Ball is translation-invariant, i.e. irrelevant with position of  .  In particular,
.  In particular,  .
 .
With large enough  , the rate
, the rate  and  the relative distance
 and  the relative distance  satisfies the Elias-Bassalygo bound:
 satisfies the Elias-Bassalygo bound: 
where
is the q-ary entropy function and
-   is a function related with Johnson bound. is a function related with Johnson bound.
Proof
To prove the Elias–Bassalygo bound, start with the following Lemma:
Lemma 1: Given a q-ary code, ![C\subseteq  [q]^n](../I/m/85eac2353e9987c83c520fed5b7a0f6a.png) and
 and  , there exists a Hamming ball of radius
, there exists a Hamming ball of radius  with at least
 with at least  codewords in it.
 codewords in it.
Proof of Lemma 1: To prove Lemma 1, use the probability method. Randomly pick a received word ![y \in [q]^n](../I/m/3f216e041cf866c4468452a80a8265b3.png) . The expected size of overlapped region between
. The expected size of overlapped region between  and the Hamming ball centered at
 and the Hamming ball centered at  with radius
 with radius  ,
,  is
 is  since
 since  is (uniform) randomly selected. Since this is the expected value of the size, there must exist at least one
 is (uniform) randomly selected. Since this is the expected value of the size, there must exist at least one  such that
 such that  , otherwise the expectation must be smaller than this value.
, otherwise the expectation must be smaller than this value.
Now we prove the Elias–Bassalygo bound.
Define  .
. 
By Lemma 1, there exists a Hamming ball with  codewords such that
 codewords such that 

By the Johnson bound, we have  . Thus,
. Thus,  
The second inequality follows from lower bound on the volume of a Hamming ball:
 .
.
Putting in  and
 and  gives the second inequality.
 gives the second inequality.
Therefore we have
See also
References
Bassalygo, L. A. (1965), "New upper boundes for error-correcting codes", Problems of Information Transmission 1 (1): 32–35
Claude E. Shannon, Robert G. Gallager; Berlekamp, Elwyn R. (1967), "Lower bounds to error probability for coding on discrete memoryless channels. Part I.", Information and Control 10: 65–103, doi:10.1016/s0019-9958(67)90052-6
Claude E. Shannon, Robert G. Gallager; Berlekamp, Elwyn R. (1967), "Lower bounds to error probability for coding on discrete memoryless channels. Part II.", Information and Control 10: 522–552, doi:10.1016/s0019-9958(67)91200-4


