Ergodic process
In econometrics and signal processing, a stochastic process is said to be ergodic if its statistical properties can be deduced from a single, sufficiently long, random sample of the process. The reasoning is that any collection of random samples from a process must represent the average statistical properties of the entire process. In other words, regardless of what the individual samples are, a birds-eye view of the collection of samples must represent the whole process. Conversely, a process that is not ergodic is a process that changes erratically at an inconsistent rate.[1]
Specific definitions
One can discuss the ergodicity of various statistics of a stochastic process. For example, a wide-sense stationary process has constant mean
- ,
and autocovariance
- ,
that depends only on the lag and not on time . The properties and are ensemble averages not time averages.
The process is said to be mean-ergodic[2] or mean-square ergodic in the first moment[3] if the time average estimate
converges in squared mean to the ensemble average as .
Likewise, the process is said to be autocovariance-ergodic or mean-square ergodic in the second moment[3] if the time average estimate
converges in squared mean to the ensemble average , as . A process which is ergodic in the mean and autocovariance is sometimes called ergodic in the wide sense.[3]
An important example of an ergodic processes is the stationary Gaussian process with continuous spectrum.
Discrete-time random processes
The notion of ergodicity also applies to discrete-time random processes for integer .
A discrete-time random process is ergodic in mean if
converges in squared mean to the ensemble average , as .
Example of a non-ergodic random process
Suppose that we have two coins: one coin is fair and the other has two heads. We choose (at random) one of the coins, and then perform a sequence of independent tosses of our selected coin. Let X[n] denote the outcome of the nth toss, with 1 for heads and 0 for tails. Then the ensemble average is ½ · ½ + ½ · 1 = ¾; yet the long-term average is ½ for the fair coin and 1 for the two-headed coin. Hence, this random process is not ergodic in mean.
See also
- Ergodic hypothesis
- Ergodicity
- Ergodic theory, a branch of mathematics concerned with a more general formulation of ergodicity
- Loschmidt's paradox
- Poincaré recurrence theorem
Notes
References
- Porat, B. (1994). Digital Processing of Random Signals: Theory & Methods. Prentice Hall. p. 14. ISBN 0-13-063751-3.
- Papoulis, Athanasios (1991). Probability, random variables, and stochastic processes. New York: McGraw-Hill. pp. 427–442. ISBN 0-07-048477-5.