Evans v. Michigan
| Evans v. Michigan | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| Argued November 6, 2012 Decided January 20, 2013 | |||||||
| Full case name | Lamar Evans v. Michigan | ||||||
| Docket nos. | 11-1327 | ||||||
| Citations | |||||||
| Prior history |
acquittal reversed and remanded, 288 Mich.App. 410, 794 N.W.2d 848 (2010); affirmed, 491 Mich. 1, 810 N.W.2d 535; certiorari granted, 567 U.S. ___ (2012) | ||||||
| Argument | Oral argument | ||||||
| Holding | |||||||
| The double jeopardy clause bars a retrial when a directed verdict was rendered, even if erroneous. Michigan Supreme Court reversed. | |||||||
| Court membership | |||||||
| |||||||
| Case opinions | |||||||
| Majority | Sotomayor, joined by Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Kagan | ||||||
| Dissent | Alito | ||||||
Evans v. Michigan 568 U.S. ___ (2013) was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that if a person accused of a crime receives a directed acquittal, the Double Jeopardy Clause bars a second trial of that person for the same crime, even if the person was acquitted in error.[1]
References
- ↑ Evans v. Michigan www.scotusblog.com Retrieved February 27, 2013
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Sunday, February 21, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.
