Fama–MacBeth regression

The Fama-MacBeth regression is a method used to estimate parameters for asset pricing models such as the Capital asset pricing model (CAPM). The method estimates the betas and risk premia for any risk factors that are expected to determine asset prices. The method works with multiple assets across time (panel data). The parameters are estimated in two steps:

  1. First regress each asset against the proposed risk factors to determine that asset's beta for that risk factor.
  2. Then regress all asset returns for a fixed time period against the estimated betas to determine the risk premium for each factor.

Eugene F. Fama and James D. MacBeth (1973) demonstrated that the residuals of risk-return regressions and the observed "fair game" properties of the coefficients are consistent with an "efficient capital market" (quotes in the original).[1]

Note that Fama MacBeth regressions provide standard errors corrected only for cross-sectional correlation. The standard errors from this method do not correct for time-series autocorrelation. This is usually not a problem for stock trading since stocks have weak time-series autocorrelation in daily and weekly holding periods, but autocorrelation is stronger over long horizons.[2] This means Fama MacBeth regressions may be inappropriate to use in many corporate finance settings where project holding periods tend to be long. For alternative methods of correcting standard errors for time series and cross-sectional correlation in the error term look into double clustering by firm and year.[3]

See also

References

  1. ↑ Fama, Eugene F.; MacBeth, James D. (1973). "Risk, Return, and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests". Journal of Political Economy 81 (3): 607–636. doi:10.1086/260061. JSTOR 1831028.
  2. ↑ Fama, E. F.; French, K. R. (1988). "Permanent and temporary components of stock prices". Journal of Political Economy 96 (2): 246–273. doi:10.1086/261535. JSTOR 1833108.
  3. ↑ Petersen, Mitchell (2009). "Estimating Standard Errors in Finance Panel Data Sets: Comparing Approaches". Review of Financial Studies 22 (1): 435–480. doi:10.1093/rfs/hhn053.

External links


This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Monday, August 10, 2015. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.