Fluorescent tag

S. cerevisiae septins revealed with fluorescent microscopy utilizing fluorescent labeling

In molecular biology and biotechnology, a fluorescent tag, also known as a label or probe, is a molecule that is attached chemically to aid in the labeling and detection of a biomolecule such as a protein, antibody, or amino acid. Generally, fluorescent tagging, or labeling, uses a reactive derivative of a fluorescent molecule known as a fluorophore. The fluorophore selectively binds to a specific region or functional group on the target molecule and can be attached chemically or biologically.[1] Various labeling techniques such as enzymatic labeling, protein labeling, and genetic labeling are widely utilized. Ethidium bromide, fluorescein and green fluorescent protein are common tags. The most commonly labelled molecules are antibodies, proteins, amino acids and peptides which are then used as specific probes for detection of a particular target.[2]

History

Stokes George G
Osamu Shimomura-press conference Dec 06th, 2008-1

The development of methods to detect and identify biomolecules has been motivated by the ability to improve the study of molecular structure and interactions. Before the technology of fluorescent labeling, radioisotopes were used to detect and identify molecular compounds. Since then, safer methods have been developed that involve the use of fluorescent dyes or fluorescent proteins as tags or probes as a means to label and identify biomolecules.[3] Although fluorescent tagging in this regard has only been recently utilized, the discovery of fluorescence has been around for a much longer time.

Sir George Stokes developed the Stokes Law of Fluorescence in 1852 which states that the wavelength of fluorescence emission is greater than that of the exciting radiation. Richard Meyer then termed fluorophore in 1897 to describe a chemical group associated with fluorescence. Since then, Fluorescein was created as a fluorescent dye by Adolph von Baeyer in 1871 and the method of staining was developed and utilized with the development of fluorescence microscopy in 1911.[4]

Within the past century, Ethidium bromide and variants were developed in the 1950s,[4] and in 1994, fluorescent proteins or FPs were introduced.[5] Green fluorescent protein or GFP was discovered by Osamu Shimomura in the 1960s and was developed as a tracer molecule by Douglas Prasher in 1987.[6] FPs led to a breakthrough of live cell imaging with the ability to selectively tag genetic protein regions and observe protein functions and mechanisms.[5] For this breakthrough, Shimomura was awarded the Nobel Prize in 2008.[7]

In recent years, new methods for tracking biomolecules have been developed including the use of colorimetric biosensors, photochromic compounds, biomaterials, and electrochemical sensors. Fluorescent labeling is also a common method in which applications have expanded to enzymatic labeling, chemical labeling, protein labeling, and genetic labeling.[1]

Types of biosensors

Methods for tracking biomolecules

There are currently several labeling methods for tracking biomolecules. Some of the methods include the following.

Isotope markers

Common species that isotope markers are used for include proteins. In this case, amino acids with stable isotopes of either carbon, nitrogen, or hydrogen are incorporated into polypeptide sequences.[8] These polypeptides are then put through mass spectrometry. Because of the exact defined change that these isotopes incur on the peptides, it is possible to tell through the spectrometry graph which peptides contained the isotopes. By doing so, one can extract the protein of interest from several others in a group. Isotopic compounds play an important role as photochromes, described below.

Colorimetric biosensors

Biosensors are attached to a substance of interest. Normally, this substance would not be able to absorb light, but with the attached biosensor, light can be absorbed and emitted on a spectrophotometer.[9] Additionally, biosensors that are fluorescent can be viewed with the naked eye. Some fluorescent biosensors also have the ability to change color in changing environments (ex: from blue to red). A researcher would be able to inspect and get data about the surrounding environment based on what color he or she could see visibly from the biosensor-molecule hybrid species.[10]

Colorimetric assays are normally used to determine how much concentration of one species there is relative to another.[9]

Photochromic compounds

Photochromic compounds have the ability to switch between a range or variety of colors. Their ability to display different colors lies in how they absorb light. Different isomeric manifestations of the molecule absorbs different wavelengths of light, so that each isomeric species can display a different color based on its absorption. These include photoswitchable compounds, which are proteins that can switch from a non-fluorescent state to that of a fluorescent one given a certain environment.[11]

The most common organic molecule to be used as a photochrome is diarylethene.[12] Other examples of photoswitchable proteins include PADRON-C, rs-FastLIME-s and bs-DRONPA-s, which can be used in plant and mammalian cells alike to watch cells move into different environments.[11]

Biomaterials

Fluorescent biomaterials are a possible way of using external factors to observe a pathway more visibly. The method involves fluorescently labeling peptide molecules that would alter an organism's natural pathway. When this peptide is inserted into the organism's cell, it can induce a different reaction. This method can be used, for example to treat a patient and then visibly see the treatment's outcome.[13]

Electrochemical sensors

Electrochemical sensors can used for label-free sensing of biomolecules. They detect changes and measure current between a probed metal electrode and an electrolyte containing the target analyte. A known potential to the electrode is then applied from a feedback current and the resulting current can be measured. For example, one technique using electrochemical sensing includes slowly raising the voltage causing chemical species at the electrode to be oxidized or reduced. Cell current vs voltage is plotted which can ultimately identify the quantity of chemical species consumed or produced at the electrode.[14] Fluorescent tags can be used in conjunction with electrochemical sensors for ease of detection in a biological system.

Fluorescent labels

Aequorea victoria
GFP structure

Of the various methods of labeling biomolecules, fluorescent labels are advantageous in that they are highly sensitive even at low concentration and non-destructive to the target molecule folding and function.[1]

Green fluorescent protein is a naturally occurring fluorescent protein from the jellyfish Aequorea victoria that is widely used to tag proteins of interest. GFP emits a photon in the green region of the light spectrum when excited by the absorption of light. The chromophore consists of an oxidized tripeptide -Ser^65-Tyr^66-Gly^67 located within a β barrel. GFP catalyzes the oxidation and only requires molecular oxygen. GFP has been modified by changing the wavelength of light absorbed to include other colors of fluorescence. YFP or yellow fluorescent protein, BFP or blue fluorescent protein, and CFP or cyan fluorescent protein are examples of GFP variants. These variants are produced by the genetic engineering of the GFP gene.[15]

An equivalent RNA mimic version of GFP has also been developed, known as the Spinach aptamer.[16] Similar to GFP, Spinach can be genetically encoded on the mRNA level for cellular imaging without the need of chemical ligation or hybridization.

Synthetic fluorescent probes can also be used as fluorescent labels. Advantages of these labels include a smaller size with more variety in color. They can be used to tag proteins of interest more selectively by various methods including chemical recognition-based labeling, such as utilizing metal-chelating peptide tags, and biological recognition-based labeling utilizing enzymatic reactions.[17] However, despite their wide array of excitation and emission wavelengths as well as better stability, synthetic probes tend to be toxic to the cell and so are not generally used in cell imaging studies.[1]

Fluorescent labels can be hybridized to mRNA to help visualize interaction and activity, such as mRNA localization. An antisense strand labeled with the fluorescent probe is attached to a single mRNA strand, and can then be viewed during cell development to see the movement of mRNA within the cell.[18]

Use of tags in fluorescent labeling

In a direct fluorescent antibody test, antibodies have been chemically linked to a fluorescent dye
FISH image of bifidobacteria Cy3
FISH analysis di george syndrome

Fluorescent labeling is known for its non-destructive nature and high sensitivity. This has made it one of the most widely used methods for labeling and tracking biomolecules.[1] Several techniques of fluorescent labeling can be utilized depending on the nature of the target.

Enzymatic labeling

In enzymatic labeling, a DNA construct is first formed, using a gene and the DNA of a fluorescent protein.[19] After transcription, a hybrid RNA + fluorescent is formed. The object of interest is attached to an enzyme that can recognize this hybrid DNA. Usually fluorescein or biotin is used as the fluorophore.

Chemical labeling

Chemical labeling or the use of chemical tags utilizes the interaction between a small molecule and a specific genetic amino acid sequence.[20] Chemical labeling is sometimes used as an alternative for GFP. Synthetic proteins that function as fluorescent probes are smaller than GFP's, and therefore can function as probes in a wider variety of situations. Moreover, they offer a wider range of colors and photochemical properties.[21] With recent advancements in chemical labeling, Chemical tags are preferred over fluorescent proteins due to the architectural and size limitations of the fluorescent protein's characteristic β-barrel. Alterations of fluorescent proteins would lead to loss of fluorescent properties.[20]

Protein labeling

Protein labeling uses a short tag to minimize disruption of protein folding and function. Transition metals are used to link specific residues in the tags to site-specific targets such as the N-termini, C-termini, or internal sites within the protein. Examples of tags used for protein labeling include biarsenical tags, Histidine tags, and FLAG tags.[1]

Genetic labeling

Fluorescence in situ hybridization, or FISH, is an example of a genetic labeling technique that utilizes probes that are specific for chromosomal sites along the length of a chromosome, also known as chromosome painting. Multiple fluorescent dyes that each have a distinct excitation and emission wavelength are bound to a probe which is then hybridized to chromosomes. A fluorescence microscope can detect the dyes present and send it to a computer that can reveal the karyotype of a cell. This technique allows abnormalities such as deletions and duplications to be revealed.[22]

Recent advancements in cell imaging

In recent years, chemical tags have been tailored to advanced imaging technologies more so than fluorescent proteins due to the fact that chemical tags can localize photosensitizers closer to the target proteins. Proteins can then be labeled and detected with imaging such as super-resolution microscopy, Ca2+-imaging, pH sensing, hydrogen peroxide detection, chromophore assisted light inactivation, and multi-photon light microscopy. In vivo imaging studies in live animals have been performed for the first time with the use of a monomeric protein derived from the bacterial haloalkane dehalogenase known as the Halo-tag.[20][23] The Halo-tag covalently links to its ligand and allows for better expression of soluble proteins.[23]

Advantages

Although fluorescent dyes may not have the same sensitivity that radioactive probes did, they are able to show real-time activity of molecules in action.[24] Moreover, radiation and appropriate handling is no longer a concern.

With the development of fluorescent tagging, fluorescent microscopy has allowed the visualization of specific proteins in both fixed and live cell images. Localization of specific proteins has led to important concepts in cellular biology such as the functions of distinct groups of proteins in cellular membranes and organelles. In live cell imaging, fluorescent tags enable movements of proteins and their interactions to be monitored.[22]

Latest advances in methods involving fluorescent tags have led to the visualization of mRNA and its localization within various organisms. Live cell imaging of RNA can be achieved by introducing synthesized RNA that is chemically coupled with a fluorescent tag into living cells by microinjection. This technique was used to show how the oskar mRNA in the Drosophila embryo localizes to the posterior region of the oocyte.[25]

Notes

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Sahoo, Harekrushna (1 January 2012). "Fluorescent labeling techniques in biomolecules: a flashback". RSC Advances 2 (18): 7017–7029. doi:10.1039/C2RA20389H. Retrieved 9 March 2013.
  2. ↑ Presentation on Fluorescent labelling of biomolecules with organic probes | PharmaXChange.info
  3. ↑ Gwynne and Page, Peter and Guy. "Laboratory Technology Trends: Fluorescence + Labeling". Science. Retrieved 10 March 2013.
  4. 1 2 Kricka LJ, Fortina P (April 2009). "Analytical ancestry: "firsts" in fluorescent labeling of nucleosides, nucleotides, and nucleic acids". Clin. Chem. 55 (4): 670–83. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2008.116152. PMID 19233914.
  5. 1 2 "Chemical Tags for Labeling Proteins Inside Living Cells".
  6. ↑ "Green Fluorescent Protein - GFP History - Osamu Shimomura".
  7. ↑ Shimomura, Osamu. "The Nobel Prize in Chemistry". Retrieved 5 April 2013.
  8. ↑ Chen, Xian; Smith, Lloyd M.; Bradbury, E. Morton (1 March 2000). "Site-Specific Mass Tagging with Stable Isotopes in Proteins for Accurate and Efficient Protein Identification". Analytical Chemistry 72 (6): 1134–1143. doi:10.1021/ac9911600. Retrieved 3 April 2013.
  9. 1 2 "Colorimetric Assays". Retrieved 3 April 2013.
  10. ↑ Halevy, Revital; Sofiya Kolusheval; Robert E.W. Hancock; Raz Jelinek (2002). "Colorimetric Biosensor Vesicles for Biotechnological Applications" (PDF). Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings. 724. Biological and Biomimetic Materials - Properties to Function. Retrieved 4 April 2013.
  11. 1 2 Lummer, M; Humpert, F; Wiedenlüebbert, M; Sauer, M; Schüettpelz, M; Staiger, D (Feb 23, 2013). "A new set of reversibly photoswitchable fluorescent proteins for use in transgenic plants.". Molecular plant 6 (5): 1518–30. doi:10.1093/mp/sst040. PMID 23434876.
  12. ↑ Perrier, Aurélie; Maurel, François; Jacquemin, Denis (21 August 2012). "Single Molecule Multiphotochromism with Diarylethenes". Accounts of Chemical Research 45 (8): 1173–1182. doi:10.1021/ar200214k. PMID 22668009.
  13. ↑ Zhang, Yi; Yang, Jian (1 January 2013). "Design strategies for fluorescent biodegradable polymeric biomaterials". Journal of Materials Chemistry B 1 (2): 132. doi:10.1039/C2TB00071G.
  14. ↑ "bioee.ee.columbia.edu" (PDF).
  15. ↑ Cox, Michael; Nelson, David R.; Lehninger, Albert L (2008). Lehninger principles of biochemistry. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman. ISBN 0-7167-7108-X.
  16. ↑ Paige JS, Wu KY, Jaffrey SR (29 July 2011). "RNA Mimics of Green Fluorescent Protein". Science 33 (6042): 642–646. doi:10.1126/science.1207339. PMID 21798953.
  17. ↑ Jung D, Min K, Jung J, Jang W, Kwon Y (January 2013). "Chemical biology-based approaches on fluorescent labeling of proteins in live cells". Mol Biosyst 9 (5): 862–72. doi:10.1039/c2mb25422k. PMID 23318293.
  18. ↑ Weil, Timothy T.; Parton, Richard M.; Davis, Ilan (1 July 2010). "Making the message clear: visualizing mRNA localization". Trends in Cell Biology 20 (7): 380–390. doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2010.03.006. PMID 20444605.
  19. ↑ A. Richter, C. Schwager, S. Hentze, W. Ansorge, M.W. Hentze, and M. Muckenthaler (2002). "Comparison of Fluorescent Tag DNA Labeling Methods Used for Expression Analysis by DNA Microarrays" (PDF). BioTechniques 33:620-630. Retrieved 4 April 2013.
  20. 1 2 3 Wombacher R, Cornish VW (June 2011). "Chemical tags: applications in live cell fluorescence imaging". J Biophotonics 4 (6): 391–402. doi:10.1002/jbio.201100018. PMID 21567974.
  21. ↑ Jung, Deokho; Min, Kyoungmi; Jung, Juyeon; Jang, Wonhee; Kwon, Youngeun (1 January 2013). "Chemical biology-based approaches on fluorescent labeling of proteins in live cells". Molecular BioSystems 9 (5): 862. doi:10.1039/C2MB25422K.
  22. 1 2 Matthew P Scott; Lodish, Harvey F.; Arnold Berk; Kaiser, Chris; Monty Krieger; Anthony Bretscher; Hidde Ploegh; Angelika Amon (2012). Molecular Cell Biology. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman. ISBN 1-4292-3413-X.
  23. 1 2 N Peterson S, Kwon K (2012). "The HaloTag: Improving Soluble Expression and Applications in Protein Functional Analysis". Curr Chem Genomics 6 (1): 8–17. doi:10.2174/1875397301206010008. PMC 3480702. PMID 23115610.
  24. ↑ Proudnikov, Dmitri; Andrei Mirzabekov (1996). "Chemical methods of DNA and RNA fluorescent labeling" (PDF). Oxford University Press 24 (22): 4535–42. doi:10.1093/nar/24.22.4535. PMC 146275. PMID 8948646. Retrieved 5 April 2013.
  25. ↑ "Making the message clear: visualizing mRNA localization".

See also

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Wednesday, March 09, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.