Forensic speechreading

Forensic speechreading (or forensic lipreading) is the use of speechreading for information or evidential purposes. Forensic speechreading can be considered a branch of forensic linguistics. In contrast to speaker recognition which is often the focus of voice analysis from an audio record, forensic speechreading usually aims to establish the content of speech, since the identity of the talker is usually apparent. Often, it involves the production of a transcript of lipread video-records of talk that lack a usable audiotrack, for example CCTV material. Occasionally, 'live' lipreading is involved, for example in the Casey Anthony case.[1] Forensic speechreaders are usually deaf or from deaf families (CODA), and use speechreading in their daily lives to a greater extent than people with normal hearing outwith a deaf community. Some speechreading tests suggest deaf people can be better lipreaders than most hearing people.[2]

Speechreading expertise

No tests of speechreading have yet been developed in a forensic context: that is, to benchmark individual skills in speechreading from a video record, including production of a reliable transcript.[3] For many years, UK agencies made extensive use of one particular speechreader, whose reports are now not to be used for evidential purposes.[4] Several speechreaders and deaf professionals currently offer these services. In the UK,these include Terry Ruane, Laraine Callow MBE,Tina Lannin among others. In the US, Consuelo Gonzalez is a leading lipreading expert. Expert speechreaders may be able to advise on various issues, including whether a videorecord is or is not speechreadable, and the accent and language used by a talker.[5] Commissioning agents need to be aware of issues inherent in the unreliability of speechreading, and be prepared to treat such advice with caution.[6]

Forensic speechreading and the law

In the UK, a landmark case and appeal (R. v Luttrell et al., 2004) established the admissibility of lipreading evidence.[7] However, the appeal court also required that the judge should issue a special warning as to its risks and limitations.[8]

While lipread speech can carry useful speech information, it is inherently less accurate than (clearly) heard speech because many distinctive features of speech are produced by actions of the tongue within the oral cavity and are not visible.[9][10] This is a limitation imposed by speech itself, not the expertise of the speechreader. It is the main reason why the accuracy of a speechreader working on a purely visual record cannot be considered wholly reliable, however skilled they may be and irrespective of hearing status.[10] The type of evidence and the utility of such evidence varies from case to case.

In the US, there is debate concerning the admissibility of speechreading evidence and its status,[11] especially in relation to variations in state and federal evidential procedures, and with respect to the privacy implications of the Fourth Amendment to the US constitution.[12]

Three UK cases involving speechreading evidence

[27]

References

  1. "Did Casey Anthony Contradict Her Own Defense by Mouthing Words". ABC News. July 5, 2011. Retrieved October 5, 2012.
  2. Auer, Edward T.; Bernstein, Lynne E. (2007). "Enhanced Visual Speech Perception in Individuals with Early-Onset Hearing Impairment". Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 50 (5): 1157–65. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2007/080). PMID 17905902.
  3. Campbell, Ruth; Mohammed, Tara-Jane Ellis (2010). "Speechreading for information gathering: a survey of scientific sources". Deafness Cognition and Language Research Centre.
  4. "CPS drops So Solid expert witness". BBC News. 2005-06-27. Retrieved 2012-10-15.
  5. "FAQ". Lip Reading Translation. Retrieved 2012-10-15.
  6. Campbell, Ruth (2010). "Guidance for organizations planning to use lipreading for information gathering". Deafness Cognition and Language Research Centre. Retrieved November 4, 2012.
  7. original case notes; http://lexisweb.co.uk/cases/2004/may/r-v-luttrell-and-others-r-v-dawson-and-another: appeal court decision; http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2004/1344.html&query=luttrell&method=boolean
  8. updated ruling in relation to expert witness evidence; Mary Luckham 'Forensic lipreading',http://www.qebholliswhiteman.co.uk/articles-pdfs/forensic-lip-reading.pdf
  9. Breeuwer, M; Plomp, R (1986). "Speechreading supplemented with auditorily presented speech parameters". The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 79 (2): 481–99. doi:10.1121/1.393536. PMID 3950202.
  10. 1 2 Auer, Edward T. (2010). "Investigating Speechreading and Deafness". Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 21 (3): 163–8. doi:10.3766/jaaa.21.3.4. PMID 20211120.
  11. "e-wire article: Taking experts out of the court". Jspubs.com. 2004-07-15. Retrieved 2012-10-15.
  12. CM (June 4, 2011). "Read My Lips, No Lip Reading Testimony?: Court Of Appeals Of Indiana Opinion Poses Question About Lip Read Statements". EvidenceProf Blog. Retrieved 2012-10-15.
  13. "Nine jailed over £11m stolen goods". BBC News. 2003-02-27. Retrieved 2012-10-15.
  14. "Luttrell & Ors, R v [2004] EWCA Crim 1344 (28 May 2004)". Bailii.org. Retrieved 2012-10-15.
  15. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1420816/Lip-reader-saw-Frasers-incriminating-conversations.html[]
  16. "Press Office - Frontline Scotland reveals new evidence in Arlene Fraser murder case". BBC. 2005-10-19. Retrieved 2012-10-15.
  17. "John Terry's racist slur uncensored in slow motion". YouTube. 2011-12-02. Retrieved 2012-10-15.
  18. "Racist and Religious Crime: Legal Guidance: The Crown Prosecution Service". Cps.gov.uk. Retrieved 2012-10-15.
  19. The Guardian 12th July 2012
  20. judgement; http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/media/judgments/2012/r-v-john-terry-judgment[]
  21. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-18827915[]
  22. The Football Association and John Terry
  23. r-v-john-terry
  24. The Football Association and John Terry(1.5)
  25. r-v-john-terry (page 4)
  26. http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/19842795[]
  27. http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2012/oct/05/john-terry-judgment-commission[]
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Saturday, February 13, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.