François Recanati
François Recanati (born 1952) is a French analytic philosopher and professor of language and mind.[1]
Biography
Recanati has been a research fellow at the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique since 1979.[2]
In 1991, Recanati was named the first president for the European Society for Analytic Philosophy. He would retain the position until 1993.[3]
He has previously taught at the University of California, Berkeley, Harvard University and the University of St Andrews.[2]
Notable publications
- Meaning and Force: The Pragmatics of Performative Utterances, Cambridge University Press, 1988
- Direct Reference: From Language to Thought, Blackwell Publishers, 1993, 1997
- Oratio Obliqua, Oratio Recta: An Essay on Metarepresentation, MIT Press, 2000
- Literal Meaning, Cambridge University Press, 2003; ISBN 0521537363
- Perspectival Thought: A Plea for (Moderate) Relativism, Clarendon Press, 2007
- Truth-Conditional Pragmatics, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2010
- Mental Files, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012; ISBN 978-0-19-965998-2
Critical works
Recanati's work is analyzed or commented on in various published works, including:
- Saying, Meaning and Referring: Essays on François Recanati's Philosophy of Language edited by Maria Jose Frapolli; Palgrave Macmillan (2007) ISBN 978-1403933287
Reviews
Jason Stanley of Rutgers University, reviewed Literal Meaning in Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews.[4] He wrote: " In Recanati (1993, pp. 227-274), he argued that what is intuitively said by an utterance is affected by context in ways that could not be explained by any combination of Chomsky, Montague and Grice (that is, ordinary syntax and semantics, together with Gricean pragmatics). Since the publication of that work, he has been developing this thesis in detail. His arguments for the thesis he calls contextualism are brought together in characteristically clear and concise form in Literal Meaning."[4] Stanley later comments "The problem with Recanati's appeal to circumstances of evaluation to justify incomplete semantic contents is that it is in tension with much of current linguistic research."[4] and sums up: "In this book, Recanati does an extremely impressive job of laying out the interlocking commitments of his favored version of this position. Furthermore, he faces up to these commitments more honestly than almost any other member of the debate."[4]
Kent Bach, of San Francisco State University reviewed Truth-Conditional Pragmatics in Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews.[5] Bach opened his review with the comment that "If you're unfamiliar with the title phrase of François Recanati's latest book, you'll naturally think he's proposing an alternative to truth-conditional semantics. And you'll be right. But not in the way you'd expect. And not in the way he intends."[5] and summed up by saying "Thanks to Recanati's openness to diverse approaches, his fairness in critically examining competing views, his carefully nuanced argumentation, and his general thoroughness, to my mind the main rewards offered by the book Truth-Conditional Pragmatics can be derived by delving into its details. That's what I recommend doing."[5]
References
- ↑ Philosophy at St Andrews: Staff profiles
- 1 2 Francois Recanati - Centre for the Study of Mind in Nature
- ↑ ESAP
- 1 2 3 4 Stanley, Jason (9 August 2005). "François Recanati: Literal Meaning". Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews. University of Notre Dame. Retrieved 25 September 2013.
- 1 2 3 Bach, Kent (31 August 2011). "François Recanati: Truth-Conditional Pragmatics". Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews. University of Notre Dame. Retrieved 25 September 2013.