Gila Sher

Gila Sher
Born Israel
Era 20th-century philosophy
Region Western Philosophy
School Analytic Philosophy
Main interests
 Philosophy of Logic, Epistemology
Notable ideas
 Foundational holism

Gila Sher is a professor of philosophy at the University of California, San Diego. She has worked extensively in the theory of truth and philosophy of logic. Sher is a leading advocate of foundational holism, a holistic theory of epistemology.

Sher earned a Ph.D. in philosophy from Columbia University, where she studied the works of Willard Quine and Alfred Tarski. Her dissertation was directed by Charles Parsons. Her early work focused on Tarski's definition of truth. Her reformulation of this definition has been influential in modern truth theory. Her dissertation was expanded into the book The Bounds of Logic (1991),[1] in which Sher also formalized definitions for unique second-order quantifiers such as 'most'.[1]

Sher has pursued research into logical positivism and logical foundationalism. She has argued that strict-ordering Foundationalism, in the vein of Rudolf Carnap, is untenable, supporting Quine's argument from Two Dogmas of Empiricism. She has, however, resisted the mainstream move toward all-or-nothing and semantic holism. The former view she considers unexplanatory, and the latter she considers untenable (see: Jerry Fodor).[2]

Sher has also written more generally on the metaphysics of truth. She put forward an influential criticism of John Etchemendy in the article "Did Tarski Commit Tarski's Fallacy?"[3] This article was influential in defending Tarskian truth theory from the radical attack posed by Etchemendy. She is also a leading Quine scholar, writing about the place of philosophy in his theory of naturalized epistemology.[4]

Since 2012, she is one of editors-in-chief of the journal Synthese.[5]

External links

Bibliography

References

  1. 1 2 Sher, Gila. (1991), The Bounds of Logic, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  2. ↑ Sher, Gila. (2004), In Search of a Substantive Theory of Truth, The Journal of Philosophy
  3. ↑ Sher, Gila. (1996), Did Tarski Commit Tarski's Fallacy?, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 61, 653-86.
  4. ↑ Sher, Gila. (1999), Is There a Place for Philosophy in Quine's Theory?, The Journal of Philosophy 96, 491-524.
  5. ↑ "Synthese".
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Tuesday, March 22, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.