Golubac Fortress

Golubac Fortress
Golubac, Serbia

Golubac Fortress
Golubac Fortress
Coordinates 44°39′39″N 21°40′40″E / 44.660717°N 21.677914°E / 44.660717; 21.677914
Type Fortification, mixed
Site information
Open to
the public		 Yes
Site history
Built 14th century
Materials Stone

The Golubac Fortress (Serbian: Голубачки град or Golubački grad, Hungarian: Galambóc vára, Bulgarian: Гълъбец, Romanian: Cetatea Golubăț, Turkish: Güvercinlik Kalesi) was a medieval fortified town on the south side of the Danube River, 4 km downstream from the modern-day town of Golubac, Serbia. The fortress, which was most likely built during the 14th century, is split into three compounds which were built in stages. It has ten towers, most of which started square, and several of which received many-sided reinforcements with the advent of firearms.

Golubac Fortress has had a tumultuous history. Prior to its construction it was the site of a Roman settlement. During the Middle Ages, it became the object of many battles, especially between the Ottoman Empire and the Kingdom of Hungary. It changed hands repeatedly, passing between Turks, Bulgarians, Hungarians, Serbs, and Austrians, until 1867, when it was turned over to the Serbian Knez, Mihailo Obrenović III. Now, it is a popular tourist attraction in the region and a sightseeing point on Danube boat tours.

Location

Golubac, in the Braničevo District of north-eastern Serbia and on the modern-day border with Romania, marks the entrance to the Đerdap national park. It is strategically located on the embankment of the Danube River where it narrows to form the Iron Gate gorge,[1][2] allowing for the regulation and taxation of traffic across and along the river.[3][4] In the Middle Ages, this was done with the aid of a strong chain connected to Babakaj, a rock on the far side of the river.

History

Main entrance and forward compound

Golubac's early history is uncertain. Inscriptions and evidence of older defensive structures in the area show the presence of a Roman settlement, sometimes named "Columbaria,"[5] long before the creation of Golubac.[5][6] From 803 to 1018, the area belonged to the First Bulgarian Empire, to Byzantium from then until 1193, and the Second Bulgarian Empire until 1257. The area remained in Bulgarian hands from then until the Ottoman conquest in the 15th century, with control of the region changing many times between Hungarians, Bulgarians and Serbs before then. It is also unclear whether the medieval fortress was built by Bulgarians, Serbs or Hungarians,[3][6] or how many towers it had originally. However, an Orthodox chapel built as part of one tower shows that it, at least, was built by a local noble. There is also uncertainty about when construction started, although it is generally agreed that the majority of the fortress was built early in the 14th century.[1][2][4]

The first known record of Golubac is in Hungarian sources from 1335, when it was occupied by Hungarian military.[6] Sometime between 1345 and 1355, Serbian Tsar Stefan Dušan toured the Braničevo region, which was part of Serbia. He also visited Golubac, which was under the command of Castellan Toma, Voivode of Transylvania.[6] After Dušan's death, the House of Rastislalić gained influence in Braničevo, later winning independence. According to Serbian chroniclers, Knez Lazar evicted the last Rastislalić feudal lord, Radič Branković, in 1379, then presented outlying villages to monasteries in Wallachia.[6] By the time of the Battle of Kosovo in 1389, Golubac was held by Serbia. It is unclear when or how it changed hands, though one source puts it later than 1382.[6] After the battle, the fortress was lost to Sultan Bayezid I, marking the first possession by the Ottoman Empire. In 1391, Golubac switched hands twice. Hungarian Timişoaran Comes Péter Perényi won it, but shortly afterwards lost it again to the Turks.[5] Later, it returned once again to the Kingdom of Hungary.

Forward compound

The first extended Serbian possession of Golubac began in 1403 when Sigismund, King of Hungary, ceded it as a personal fiefdom to Despot Stefan Lazarević after he became a Hungarian vassal. When the issue of Stefan's successor came up in 1426, he and Sigismund met in May in Tata to discuss it. A contract was written stating that Sigismund would accept Đurađ Branković as successor on the condition that Golubac, Belgrade, and Mačva were returned to Hungary when Stefan died.[7][8] After Stefan's death in 1427, Sigismund hurried to have the clauses of the Tata contract fulfilled, and Belgrade and Mačva were handed over without a problem. However, Golubac's commander, Voivode Jeremija, demanded a compensation of 12,000 ducats.[7] When Sigismund refused to pay, Jeremija handed Golubac to the Turks,[7][8] who turned it into the pasha's residence.

Despite gaining Golubac, Sultan Murad II was not pleased with the increased Hungarian influence elsewhere in Serbia, so he sent his army to attack. One squad came from Golubac and targeted nearby Serbian and Hungarian settlements in the Braničevo region.[7] In response, Đurađ personally travelled to Golubac, promising forgiveness to Jeremija and urging him to return the fortress by any means possible. The Voivode refused, and attacked the Despot when he and his escort attempted to enter the walls.[7] These betrayals were followed in 1428 by the Battle of Golubac.[5]

View from the eastern tower

Around April 1428, Sigismund amassed an army of 25,000 infantry, 6,000 Wallachian archers led by Prince Dan II,[9] 200 Italian artillery, and a number of Polish cavalry on the far side of the Danube, then attacked Golubac and the Turks.[5] He also had ships attacking from the river,[7] one of which was commanded by Cecília Rozgonyi wife of Timișoaran Comes István Rozgonyi.[5] Murad rushed to help the besieged Turks, arriving in late May.[7] Sigismund, who did not wish to fight the bigger army, finalised a treaty by early June.[7] Once part of the Hungarian army had withdrawn to the far side of the river, however, the Turkish commander Sinan Bey attacked their rear,[7] capturing and killing those who remained,[5] among them the Polish knight Zawisza Czarny. Sigismund was nearly caught with the rest of his army;[7] the intervention of Cecília Rozgonyi is solely responsible for his rescue.[5][10][11]

During this and other fights resulting from Stefan's death, southern and eastern Serbia, including the Monastery of Daljša near Golubac, suffered heavily. It was after this fighting, however, that Sigismund was first referred to as "our Emperor", in the memoir of a Daljšan monk, in contrast to the Turkish "pagan emperor".[7]

The Ottoman Empire retained control of Golubac throughout its occupation of the Serbian Despotate. After years of fighting, which resulted in the Hungarian army expelling the Ottomans from Serbia, the Peace of Szeged restored the Despotate late in the summer of 1444. Included in the redefined territory, after much discussion, was Golubac Fortress.[12] However, the Turks once again conquered it after the death of Đurađ Branković in 1456. In 1458, Matthias Corvinus of Hungary regained the fortress,[13] but lost it to Mehmed II that same year.[14]

The years 1481–82 led to more fighting between the Hungarians and Turks. During the fall of 1481, while Golubac was held by the Ottoman Empire, Timișoaran Comes Pál Kinizsi undertook an expedition against the Turks in the Temes area.[15] On November 2, 1481,[15] he turned his army of 32,000 men south towards the Danube,[5] pushing to Kruševac.[15] At Golubac, a thousand Turkish cavalry were killed or taken prisoner, 24 ships were sunk, and Mihaloğlu İskender Bey, pasha of Ottoman-held Smederevo and leader of the Turkish army, was beheaded at the gate by Jakšić, one of Kinizsi's men.[5] The Turks were forced to retreat and leave the fortress behind. Kinizsi's foray was only a raid, however, and shortly after he returned to Temes. The Turks, who had suffered heavily but did not lose any land, retook Golubac and quickly improved its fortifications.[15]

Golubac was held by the Habsburg Monarchy between 1688 and 1690 and 1718 and 1739. Serb rebels controlled it during Kočina Krajina in 1788–91, and again from 1804–13, during the First Serbian Uprising. Afterwards, it fell back under Ottoman control until 1867 when it, along with Kalemegdan and other towns in Serbia, was given to Knez Mihailo of Serbia.

In recent years

From the late 19th century into the early mid-20th century, bloodsucking flies sometimes referred to as "Golubac mosquitoes" thrived in the area. They were particularly dangerous to livestock, some years killing off entire herds of cattle.[5][10][11] After World War I, a road was constructed that went through both of the fort's portcullises. This road is the shortest link between Serbia and eastern parts of the Balkan peninsula. Between 1964–72, a hydroelectric dam was built in the Iron Gate gorge, significantly elevating the river's water level. As a result, the lower edge of the slope and corresponding parts of the fortress are now flooded.[5]

From the beginning of the 21st century, much of the fort has been overgrown, making most of the sections higher on the hill inaccessible. During the spring of 2005, a public project to restore the fort was started. Most of the plants were removed and certain parts, like the fountain in the moat raised in honour of knight Zawisza Czarny, were repaired. The walls, towers and stone stairs are in good condition, but the wooden floors and steps have rotted out, making most of the upper floors impassable. Golubac has also gained popularity as a tourist attraction. Two key reasons are the major road that passes through it, and its proximity to Lepenski Vir, making the two locales a touristic whole.

Architecture

Golubac consists of three main compounds guarded by 10 towers and 2 portcullises, all connected by fortress walls 2–3 metres thick.[3][4] In front of the fortress, the forward wall (I) doubled as the outer wall of the moat,[4] which connected to the Danube and was likely filled with water. A settlement for common people was situated in front of the wall.[3]

As is the case with many fortresses, Golubac's structure was modified over time. For years, there were only five towers. Later, four more were added.[3][16] The towers were all built as squares, a sign of the fortress' age, showing that battles were still fought with cold steel. Once firearms came into use, the Turks fortified the western towers with cannon ports and polygonal or cylindrical reinforcements up to two metres thick.[4] After the Hungarian raid in 1481,[15] they added the final tower, complete with cannon embrasures and galleries.[3]

Upper compound

Topographical sketch of Golubac Fortress prior to 1972 (symbols referenced in the text)

The upper compound (A) is the oldest part of the fortress. It includes the citadel (tower 1) and the Serbian Orthodox chapel (tower 4). Although it remains uncertain, the chapel has led many to believe that this section was built by a Serbian noble.

Later, during either Serbian or Hungarian rule, the fortress was expanded to include the rear and forward compounds.

Rear compound

The rear compound (D) is separated from the upper compound by both a wall connecting towers 2 and 4, and a steep rock 3–4 metres high. Next to tower 5 is a building (VII) which was probably used as a military barracks and for ammunition storage.

Forward compound

The forward compound was split into lower (C) and upper (B) parts by a wall linking towers 4 and 7. The entrance (II) is in the lower part, guarded by towers 8 and 9. Tower 8 has, in turn, been fortified with a cannon port. Opposing the entrance was a second portcullis that led to the rear compound. Along the path was a ditch 0.5 metres wide and 0.75 metres deep which then became a steep decline. At the outer end of the lower part, and connected to the 9th tower with a low wall, is tower 10, which the Turks added to act as a lower artillery tower. It controlled passage along the Danube and guarded the entrance to the harbour, which was probably situated between towers 5 and 10. There are remains connected to tower 8 which probably formed a larger whole with it, but the lower part did not otherwise contain buildings.

In the wall that separated the upper and lower parts was a gate that led to the upper part. The upper part did not have buildings, but there remains a pathway to the stairs up to gate IV, which is 2 metres off the ground, right next to tower 3.

Towers

The first nine towers are 20–25 metres high.[3][4] In all ten towers, the floors and stairs inside were made of wood, while external stairs were made of stone. Half of the towers (1, 2, 4, 5, 10) have all four sides and are completely made of stone, while the other half (3, 6, 7, 8, 9) lack the side facing the interior of the fort.

The rear gate and tower 5 on the right, and tower 10 on the left.

Tower 1, nicknamed "Hat Tower" (Šešir-kula),[16] is one of the oldest towers, and doubles as citadel and dungeon tower. It has an eight-sided base with a circular spire rising from it and a square interior. The next tower to the west, tower 2, is completely circular in shape. The third tower has a square base, with the open side facing the dungeon tower to the north. On the top floor is a terrace that overlooks the Danube and the entrance to the Iron Gate gorge. Down the slope from tower 3 is tower 4, which also has a square base. The ground floor has a Serbian Orthodox chapel that was built into the tower, rather than being added later. The last tower along this wall, tower 5, is the only tower to remain completely square.

The top tower along the front wall of the forward compound, tower 6, has a square base which was reinforced with a six-sided foundation. Working west, the square base of tower 7 was reinforced with a circular foundation. Tower 8, on the upper side of the front portcullis, has an irregular, but generally square, base. It is also the shortest of the first nine towers. Guarding the other side is tower 9, which has a square base reinforced by an eight-sided foundation.

The last tower is the cannon tower. It has only one floor and is the shortest of all ten towers. It was built with an eight-sided base and cannon ports to help control traffic on the Danube. Tower 10 is almost identical to the three artillery towers added to Smederevo fortress.

Reconstruction plan 2014

The Government of the Republic of Serbia has applied to the reconstruction project fortress Blace with IPA funds of the European Union in the framework of the international project "Cultural Route - Fortresses on the Danube".The funds were provided through these funds in the amount of 6, 5 million.Preliminary reconstruction project fortress is by architect Marina Jovin, professional consultants on the project were Siniša Temerin and archaeologist Dr Miomir Korac .Rebuilding will take three years.

Significance

Considering the age and location of the Golubac Fortress, it is both large and well-preserved. Its placement at the head of the Iron Gate gorge allowed for easy control of river traffic.[3][4] It was the last military outpost on that stretch of the Danube river, which caused it to frequently be part of the final line of defense between Hungary and the Ottoman Empire, especially during the periods when Serbia was Ottoman-held.[8] The importance of the fortress is further indicated by the attention it received from Sigismund and Murad II, rather than just fighting between locals and commanders of nearby cities. The Golubac Fortress was declared a Monument of Culture of Exceptional Importance in 1979, and it is protected by the Republic of Serbia.

See also

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Golubac Fortress.

Notes

References

  1. 1 2 "Golubac". Archived from the original on 2007-03-09. Retrieved 2007-01-28.
  2. 1 2 "Golubac". Serbia National Association of Travel Agencies. Retrieved 2007-03-23.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Hitchcock, Don (2004-12-13). "Golubac". Retrieved 2007-01-28.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Belovukovic, Katarina. "Golubacki Grad - Festung aus dem 13. Jahrhundert" (in German). BEO-BOOKS: Bücher aus Serbien. Retrieved 2007-01-28.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Zollner, Anton (1991). "Die Burgen "Sankt Ladislaus" und "Golubatsch"". Mittelalterliche Burgen auf dem Gebiet des rumänischen Banats (in German). Retrieved 2007-03-23.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Ranisavljević, Dejan. "Stari Grad Golubac" (in Serbian). Archived from the original on 2007-03-07. Retrieved 2007-03-03.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Ćorović, Vladimir (1997). "IV. Oporavljena Srbija - V. Despot Đurađ Branković". Istorija srpskog naroda (in Serbian). Banja Luka / Belgrade: Project Rastko. ISBN 86-7119-101-X. Retrieved 2007-03-23.
  8. 1 2 3 Imber, Colin (July 2006). "Introduction" (PDF). The Crusade of Varna, 1443-45 (PDF). Ashgate Publishing. pp. 23–26. ISBN 0-7546-0144-7. Retrieved 2007-03-29.
  9. ↑ Vladislav cel Inalt Tepelus. "Timeline of Romanian History, 900-1472". Romanian Knowledge Page. Retrieved 2007-03-23.
  10. 1 2 W. B. Forster Bovill (2006-03-27) [1908]. Hungary and the Hungarians. London: Methuen & Co. p. 293. Retrieved 2007-03-23.
  11. 1 2 Esterházy, Péter. The Glance of Countess Hahn-Hahn (Down the Danube). Translated by Richard Aczel. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press. p. 225. ISBN 0-8101-1760-6. Retrieved 2007-03-23.
  12. ↑ Perjes, Geza (1999) [1989]. "Chapter I: Methodology". In Bela Kiraly (ed.), Peter Pastor (ed.). The Fall of The Medieval Kingdom of Hungary: Mohacs 1526 - Buda 1541. Translated by Maria D. Fenyo. Columbia University Press / Corvinus Library - Hungarian History. ISBN 0-88033-152-6. LCCN 88062290. Retrieved 2007-03-23.
  13. ↑ "Matthias Corvinus". NNDB. Soylent Communications. Retrieved 2007-08-03.
  14. ↑ Inalcik, Halil (July 1960). "Mehmed the Conqueror (1432-1481) and His Time". Speculum (Medieval Academy of America) 35 (3): 408–427. doi:10.2307/2849734. JSTOR 2849734.
  15. 1 2 3 4 5 Harmankaya, Kaan (2002). "Die Familie Mihaloglu - Harmankaya" (in German). Retrieved 2007-03-29.
  16. 1 2 "Monumental Heritage of the Smederevo and Braničevo Region". Regional Institute for Protection of Cultural Monuments in Smederevo, Serbia. Project Rastko. 2003. Retrieved 2007-03-29.

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Friday, March 18, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.