Hal Hinson

Hal Hinson is an American film critic who writes for the Washington Post.[1] As of July 2015 he has 887 reviews collected on the website Rotten Tomatoes. Hinson has been cited as a critic who is unpopular with his fellow critics, as he is not afraid to give a polarized review; he lauded Hudson Hawk (1991) for instance, which was universally panned.[1] Hinson wrote an essay on Montgomery Clift, entitled “Some Notes on Method Acting” for Sight & Sound in 1984.[2] He also reviewed for Film Comment in the mid 1980s.[3]

References

  1. 1 2 New York Magazine. New York Media, LLC. 7 October 1996. p. 12. ISSN 0028-7369.
  2. Kurnick, David (5 December 2011). Empty Houses: Theatrical Failure and the Novel. Princeton University Press. p. 242. ISBN 1-4008-4009-0.
  3. Robson, Eddie (31 July 2011). Coen Brothers - Virgin Film. Ebury Publishing. p. 322. ISBN 978-0-7535-4770-0.

External links


This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Wednesday, March 09, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.