Halbert v. Michigan
| Halbert v. Michigan | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| Argued April 25, 2005 Decided June 23, 2005 | |||||||
| Full case name | Antonio Dwayne Halbert v. Michigan | ||||||
| Citations | |||||||
| Holding | |||||||
| A Michigan law denying an appeals public defender to those who have plead guilty violated rights to due process and equal protection. | |||||||
| Court membership | |||||||
| |||||||
| Case opinions | |||||||
| Majority | Ginsburg, joined by Stevens, O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter, Breyer | ||||||
| Dissent | Thomas, joined by Scalia, Rehnquist | ||||||
| Laws applied | |||||||
| U.S. Const. amend. XIV | |||||||
Halbert v. Michigan, 545 U.S. 605 (2005), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that a Michigan law, which denied public counsel for defendants appealing a conviction on a plea, violated the equal protection and due process clauses of the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution.
See also
References
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Sunday, April 03, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.
