Harris v. Viegelahn
| Harris v. Viegelahn | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| Argued April 1, 2015 Decided May 18, 2015 | |||||||
| Full case name | Charles E. Harris, III, Petitioner v. Mary K. Viegelahn, Chapter 13 Trustee | ||||||
| Docket nos. | 14–400 | ||||||
| Citations | |||||||
| Holding | |||||||
| A debtor who converts to Chapter 7 bankruptcy is entitled to return of any post-petition wages not yet distributed by the Chapter 13 trustee. | |||||||
| Court membership | |||||||
| |||||||
| Case opinions | |||||||
| Majority | Ginsburg, joined by unanimous | ||||||
Harris v. Viegelahn, 575 U.S. ___ (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that "a debtor who converts to Chapter 7 bankruptcy is entitled to return of any post-petition wages not yet distributed by the Chapter 13 trustee."[1]
Opinion of the Court
Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg authored the unanimous opinion of the Court.[2]
References
External links
- Slip opinion from the U.S. Supreme Court
- SCOTUSblog coverage
- Oyez.org coverage
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Thursday, March 03, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.
