Hyperdiffusionism in archaeology

Grafton Elliot Smith: Map of Hyperdiffusionism from Egypt, 1929

Hyperdiffusionism is a hypothesis stating that one civilization or people is the creator of all logical and great things, which are then diffused to less civilized nations. Thus, all great civilizations that share similar cultural practices, such as construction of pyramids, are derived from the same single ancient nation.[1] According to its proponents, examples of hyperdiffusionism can be found in religious practices, cultural technologies, megalithic monuments, and lost ancient civilizations.

Hyperdiffusionism is different in a few ways from trans-cultural diffusion, one being that hyperdiffusionism is usually not testable due its pseudo-scientific nature (Williams 1991, 255-156). Additionally, unlike trans-cultural diffusion, hyperdiffusionism does not use trading and cultural networks to explain the expansion of a society within a single culture; instead, hyperdiffusionists claim that all major cultural innovations and societies derive from one (usually lost) ancient civilization (Williams 1991, 224-232). Ergo, the Tucson artifacts derive from Ancient Rome, carried by the "Romans who came across the Atlantic and then overland to Arizona;" this is believed because the artifacts resembled known ancient Roman artifacts (Williams 1991, 246).

Some key proponents

Charles Hapgood

Grafton Elliot Smith

Barry Fell

These three authors describe hyperdiffusionism as the driving force behind the apparent cultural similarities and population distribution among all civilizations. Hapgood's hypothesis states that one specific civilization is responsible for similar cultural practices in all other civilizations. Smith says that religions are proof of hyperdiffusionism, as similar worship ceremonies and symbols recur in geographically separated societies. Also, Smith believes that the Earth's population is made up of six types of humans, who diffused across the Earth's continents by virtue of their skin color (Smith 1931, 47-48). Finally, Fell asserts that ancient mariners, such as Druids and Phoenicians, traveled from Europe and comprised the early population of ancient America.

Carl Whiting Bishop

Carl Whiting Bishop in the 1930s and the 1940s produced a series of articles arguing hyperdiffusionism in explaining the expansion of teachnology into China. Among the scholars influenced by Bishop were Owen Lattimore, who was intrigued by Bishop's emphasis on geography as a shaping factor in Chinese civilization and his emphasis on field work rather than library research. [6]

Popular culture

Atlantis and Lemuria

Lost civilizations of the sea

Mayans

Culture

Religion and mythology

Egypt

Critiques

Ethnocentrism and racism

Pigeonholes and continuums[9]

Pseudoarchaeology

Fantastic archaeology

Hyperdiffusionism versus Independent Invention[10]

Ideology

Culture

The Diffusion Controversy

Methods

See also

Notes

  1. Fagan, Garrett G., ed. (2006). Archaeological Fantasies. Oxford, England: Routledge. pp. 362–367. ISBN 978-0-415-30593-8.
  2. Hapgood, Charles H. (1966). Maps of the Ancient Sea Kings. Philadelphia: Chilton Company. pp. 193–206.
  3. Smith, G. Elliot (1929). The Migrations of Early Culture. Manchester: Manchester University Press. pp. 4–30–132. OCLC 1868131.
  4. Smith, G. Elliot (1931). The Evolution of Man. London: Ernest Benn Limited. pp. 13–47. OCLC 637203360.
  5. Fell, Barry (1976). Ancient Settlers in the New World. New York: Quadrangle. pp. 81–92. ISBN 0-8129-0624-1.
  6. Newman, Robert P. (1992), Owen Lattimore and the 'Loss' of China, University of California Press, p. 24
  7. Webster, David (2006), "The Mystique of the Ancient Maya", in Fagan, Garrett G., ed., Archaeological Fantasies, Oxford: Routledge, pp. 129–154, 978-0-415-30593-8
  8. Hale, Christopher (2006), "The Atlantean Box", in Fagan, Garrett G., ed., Archaeological Fantasies, Oxford: Routledge, pp. 235–259, ISBN 978-0-415-30593-8
  9. Shermer, Michael (2002) [1997]. Why People Believe Weird Things. New York: St. Martin's Press. ISBN 978-0-8050-7089-7.
  10. Kehoe, Alice Beck (2008). Controversies in Archaeology. California: Left Coast Press, INC. pp. 140–172. ISBN 978-1-59874-062-2.
  11. Goldenweiser, Alexander (1927). Culture: The Diffusion Controversy. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. pp. 99–106. OCLC 1499530.
  12. Williams, Stephen (1991). Fantastic Archaeology: The Wild Side of North American Prehistory. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. pp. 224–257. ISBN 0-8122-1312-2.
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Saturday, April 16, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.