Independent sector treatment centre

Independent sector treatment centres (ISTCs) are private-sector owned treatment centres contracted within the English National Health Service to treat NHS patients free at the point of use. They are sometimes referred to as 'surgicentres' or ‘specialist hospitals’. ISTCs are often co-located with NHS hospitals. They perform common elective (i.e. non-emergency) surgery and diagnostic procedures and tests. Typically they undertake 'bulk' surgery such as hip replacements, cataract operations or MRI scans rather than more complex operations such as neurosurgery.

The NHS Plan 2000 originally conceived of opening eight treatment centres by 2005, but by August 2005 at least 25 had been opened, with more being planned. 46 NHS treatment centres opened between 2003 and 2009, treating approximately 300,000 patients a year with high rate of patient satisfaction (>94%).

Contracts

Wave I ISTCs worked on pre-arranged central government bulk contracts nominally at or below the national tariff on which NHS hospitals can charge commissioning NHS Primary Care Trusts. These contracts included a profit margin. Additional costs associated with the programme, up to a ceiling of 25% over and above the NHS Equivalent Cost, were paid for by central Government.[1] Treatments were paid for in advance by central government whether or not the numbers paid for were taken up and regardless of success rates. The rationale was that the waiting times for patients are cut by separating routine elective surgery and tests from emergency work.

Referral rates varied across the country, with some ISTCs performing as much 115% of their contracted volumes but with the average referral rate around 85%. Pressure was put on local GPs to refer patients to the centres, rather than to NHS hospitals, because the Primary Care Trusts had to pay for activity whether or not it was used.[2] According to the NHS Partners Network, which represents private providers working within the health service, GP referral rates were rising in 2009 as patients report positive experiences back to their GPs.[3]

In 2009 a British Medical Journal paper concluded that up to £927m of the £1.5bn first wave of ISTC contracts "may have been paid to ISTCs for patients who did not receive treatment".[4] This was based on a Scottish example and does not in fact reflect the experience of the English ISTC program, where referrals have been more in line with the expectations of the original contracts and continue to grow.

Debate

The Department of Health claims stated that by concentrating on a set type of procedures they are able to streamline the patient care pathway,[5] resulting in an improved patient experience[6] and help the NHS to quickly meet waiting time targets;[7] however, the majority of independent research conducted to date has contradicted these claims.

A critique of this development is that more difficult and expensive work is left for NHS hospitals to do, increasing their marginal costs and making them appear less 'efficient'. An article by Angus Wallace in the British Medical Journal (BMJ vol 332 11 March 2006) suggested that treatments may be proportionally less successful in ISTCs due to the employment of inexperienced or less fully trained staff with less backup than the NHS facilities.[8] This could result in the NHS having to fund difficult revision operations (insofar as they can be so revised) and would defeat the object of the exercise. However, a subsequent study conducted by the researchers from London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine and the Royal College of Surgeons of England confirmed the high quality of care, concluding that "patients undergoing cataract surgery or hip replacements in ISTCs achieved a slightly greater improvement … than those treated in NHS facilities" and "Patients treated in ISTCs were less likely to report post-operative problems than those treated in NHS facilities…"(BMC Health Services Research 2008. 8:78).[9] ISTC contracts typically exclude referrals of older, fatter and sicker patients, so comparisons with results in NHS hospitals who deal with these more difficult patients is difficult.

In the 2008 Healthcare Commission 2008 NHS Inpatient Survey,[10] ISTCs scored highly on a number of measures, including overall quality of care.[11]

A British Medical Journal study in 2011 concluded: " Patients undergoing surgery in ISTCs were slightly healthier and had less severe conditions than those undergoing surgery in NHS providers. Some outcomes were better in ISTCs, but differences were small compared with the impact ISTCs could have on the provision of elective services.".[12] Their findings supported the idea that separating elective surgical care from emergency services could improve the quality of care.

Providers

The NHS Plan 2000 originally conceived of opening eight treatment centres by 2005, but by August 2005 at least 25 had been opened, with more being planned. A second Wave of ISTCs was completed in 2009 and those marked the end of the centrally planned centres.[13] It was then for local PCTs to make decisions on how best to work with their local ISTCs after the initial five-year contracts have expired.[14] This list of providers was current in 2006.[15] Some of the centres subsequently changed hands.

References

  1. "Netcare Briefing" (PDF). Keep Our NHS Public. 2006. Retrieved 17 October 2014.
  2. "GPs urged to refer directly to the independent sector". Health Service Journal. 9 August 2007. Retrieved 3 February 2014.
  3. The Guardian, 2 September 2009, Private prophet
  4. Allyson Pollock and Graham Kirkwood (2009), British Medical Journal, Independent sector treatment centres: learning from a Scottish case study, BMJ 2009;338:b1421
  5. Department of Health Patient Pathways http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Healthcare/Primarycare/Treatmentcentres/DH_4097263
  6. Department of Health Patient Experience of Treatment Centres http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Healthcare/Primarycare/Treatmentcentres/DH_4001412
  7. HSJ The 18-week target, 26 May 2009 http://www.hsj.co.uk/resource-centre/your-ideas-and-suggestions/the-18-week-target/5001918.article
  8. "Fears over NHS-funded private ops". BBC News. 2006-03-10. Retrieved 2013-12-15.
  9. John Browne, Liz Jamieson, Jim Lewsey, Jan van der Meulen, Lynn Copley and Nick Black (2008), Case-mix & patients' reports of outcome in Independent Sector Treatment Centres: Comparison with NHS providers. BMC Health Services Research 2008, 8:78 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/8/78 2.
  10. Civitas Blog 'Evidence' BMA style 6 August 2009. http://www.civitas.org.uk/wordpress/?p=1407
  11. "Outcomes of elective surgery undertaken in independent sector treatment centres and NHS providers in England: audit of patient outcomes in surgery". British Medical Journal. 20 October 2011. Retrieved 2 February 2014.
  12. HSJ Three more ISTCs get green light 10 April 2008. http://www.hsj.co.uk/three-more-istcs-get-green-light/1096934.article
  13. HealthInvestor War of independents 3 June 2009 http://www.healthinvestor.co.uk/(A(ur1fkg7VyQEkAAAANGIwNzI2YjItOWFkYi00OTg2LTliM2MtOTlmNDhjMDc0MjNlSnlX28cGalW7EluCtbLL307oW7Q1)S(o3sp2kzmauj5umutqce5onrc))/ShowArticle.aspx?ID=494&AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1
  14. "Appendix A: current registered ISTCs". Health - Fourth Report. House of Commons Health Committee. 16 February 2006. Retrieved 2 February 2014.
  15. "Care UK buys rival provider". Health Service Journal. 1 January 2007. Retrieved 4 February 2014.
  16. "Care UK acquires UK Specialist Hospitals". Health Service Journal. 21 February 2013. Retrieved 4 February 2014.

Books

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Monday, October 12, 2015. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.