Italian ironclad Messina

Messina's sister ship Principe di Carignano in Naples in 1867
History
Kingdom of Italy
Name: Messina
Namesake: Messina
Laid down: 28 September 1861
Launched: 20 December 1864
Completed: February 1867
Fate: Broken up
General characteristics
Class & type: Principe di Carignano-class ironclad warship
Displacement:
  • Normal: 3,868 t (3,807 long tons)
  • Full load: 4,245 t (4,178 long tons)
Length: 72.8 m (238 ft 10 in)
Beam: 15.10 m (49 ft 6 in)
Draft: 7.27 m (23 ft 10 in)
Installed power:
  • 6 cylindrical boilers
  • 1,968 ihp (1,468 kW)
Propulsion: One single-expansion steam engine
Speed: 11.4 knots (21.1 km/h; 13.1 mph)
Range: 1,200 nmi (2,200 km) at 10 kn (19 km/h; 12 mph)
Complement: 572
Armament:
  • 4 × 8 in (203 mm) guns
  • 18 × 164 mm (6 in) guns
Armor: Belt armor: 4.75 in (121 mm)

Messina was the second of three Principe di Carignano-class ironclads built for the Italian Regia Marina (Royal Navy) in the 1860s. She was laid down in September 1861, her hull was launched in December 1864, and she was completed in February 1867. Messina was a broadside ironclad armed with a battery of four 8-inch (200 mm) guns and eighteen 164-millimeter (6.5 in) guns. Her career was limited, owing to the emergence of more modern ironclads and a severe reduction in the Italian naval budget following their defeat at the Battle of Lissa in 1866. She was discarded in 1875 and sold to ship breakers to help pay for new ironclads then under construction.

Design

Messina was 72.8 meters (239 ft) long between perpendiculars; she had a beam of 15.1 m (50 ft) and an average draft of 7.27 m (23.9 ft). She displaced 3,868 metric tons (3,807 long tons; 4,264 short tons) normally and up to 4,245 t (4,178 long tons; 4,679 short tons) at full load. She had a crew of 572. Her propulsion system consisted of one single-expansion steam engine that drove a single screw propeller, with steam supplied by six coal-fired, cylindrical fire-tube boilers. Her engine produced a top speed of 11.4 knots (21.1 km/h; 13.1 mph) from 1,968 indicated horsepower (1,468 kW), making her the fastest member of her class. She could steam for about 1,200 nautical miles (2,200 km; 1,400 mi) at a speed of 10 knots (19 km/h; 12 mph). To supplement her steam engine, the ship was barque-rigged.[1]

Messina was a broadside ironclad, and she was armed with a main battery of four 72-pounder 8 in (200 mm) guns and eighteen 164 mm (6.5 in) rifled muzzle-loading guns. The ship was equipped with a spur-shaped ram at the bow. The ship's hull was sheathed with wrought iron armor that was 4.75 in (121 mm) thick.[1]

Service history

Messina was laid down at the Regio Cantiere di Castellammare di Stabia (Royal Dockyard in Castellammare di Stabia) on 28 September 1861. She was launched on 20 December 1864 and completed in February 1867. This was too late to see action during the Third Italian War of Independence, which had ended the previous August; Principe di Carignano was the only member of her class to have been completed in time for the war. The conflict nevertheless had a significant effect on Messina's career. The government lost confidence in the fleet after the defeat at the Battle of Lissa and drastically reduced the naval budget. The cuts were so severe that the fleet had great difficulty in mobilizing its ironclad squadron to attack the port of Civitavecchia in September 1870, as part of the wars of Italian unification. Instead, the ships were laid up and the sailors conscripted to man them were sent home.[2] In addition, Messina was rapidly surpassed first by central battery and then turret ships, which rendered the first generation of ironclads with traditional broadside obsolete. As a result, Messina was not used in any significant way in her ten years in service.[1][3][4]

In around 1870, the ship's armament was revised to six 10 in (250 mm) guns, four 8 in guns, and eight 164 mm guns. In 1880, the Navy struck Messina from the list of ships and broke her up for scrap.[1] The Navy discarded both of her sisters, along with the ironclad Re di Portogallo between 1875 and 1880 to remove the cost of maintaining them from the naval budget, as part of an effort to reduce the financial impact of the new Caio Duilio and Italia-classes then under construction.[5]

Notes

  1. 1 2 3 4 Gardiner, p. 338
  2. Gardiner, p. 336
  3. Sondhaus, p. 1
  4. Ordovini et al., p. 337
  5. Sondhaus, p. 5051

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Thursday, March 03, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.