James Ford Rhodes

Rhodes in 1902.

James Ford Rhodes (May 1, 1848 – January 22, 1927), was an American industrialist and historian born in Cleveland, Ohio. After earning a fortune in the iron, coal, and steel industries by 1885, he retired from business. He devoted his life to historical research and publishing a seven-volume history of the United States beginning in 1850; his work was published from 1893-1906. He published an eighth volume in 1920. His work, History of the Civil War, 1861-1865 (1918), won the second-ever Pulitzer Prize for History that year.

Early life and education

Born in Ohio, Rhodes attended New York University, beginning in 1865. After graduation, he went to Europe, studying at the Collège de France. During his studies in Europe, he visited ironworks and steelworks. After his return to the United States, he investigated iron and coal deposits for his father.

Career

In 1874, with his father, Rhodes started in the iron, coal, and steel industries at Cleveland. Having earned a considerable fortune in this business, he retired in 1885.

Rhodes moved to Boston for access to its libraries. He devoted the rest of his life to historical research and writing United States history. His brother-in-law was Mark Hanna, a leader of the Republican Party. Rhodes developed his own political viewpoint.

His major work, History of the United States from the Compromise of 1850, was published in seven volumes, 1893–1906; the eight-volume edition appeared in 1920. His single volume, History of the Civil War, 1861-1865 (1918), earned him a Pulitzer Prize in History that year. (This work is available online at History of the Civil War, 1861-1865 (1918).)

Rhodes focused on national politics. Working from primary sources of newspapers and published memoirs, Rhodes reconstructed the process by which major national decisions were made. He evaluated the strengths and weaknesses of all the major leaders. Rhodes emphasized that slavery and the anti-slavery movement were the chief causes of the Civil War. He detailed what he classified as corruption in the Reconstruction Republican governments in Washington, D.C. and the Southern states. He said that granting of unqualified suffrage to blacks after emancipation was a mistake and added to the problems during Reconstruction.

Reception

In papers written in 1954 and 1960, historians Russell, Sheehan and Syrett described him as a Republican historian noted for criticizing his own party in his work.[1][2] Howe described Rhodes as a Democrat in his 1929 biography of Rhodes.[3]

In several books and articles, John R. Lynch, former Congressman from Mississippi, who directly participated in Mississippi's Reconstruction directly challenged for his assertions of fact and his interpretation. In his 1917 article titled "Some Historical Errors of James Ford Rhodes".[4] Lynch wrote:

"the reader of Mr. Rhodes' history cannot fail to see that he believed it was a grave mistake to have given the colored men at the South the right to vote, and in order to make the alleged historical facts harmonize with his own views upon this point, he took particular pains to magnify the virtues and minimize the faults of the Democrats and to magnify the faults and minimize the virtues of the Republicans, the colored men especially."[5]

In book VI, pp. 35–40, Rhodes said of Thaddeus Stevens, a federal lawmaker and fierce opponent of slavery and discrimination against African-Americans, that "Reconstruction Acts, ostensibly in the interest of freedom, were an attack on civilization...[and] did not show wise constructive statesmanship in forcing unqualified Negro Suffrage on the South".[6] To this assertion, Lynch replied that the Acts allowed time for transition away from the society that was built on slavery. He wrote,

"But for the adoption of the Congressional plan of Reconstruction and the subsequent legislation of the nation along the same line, the abolition of slavery through the ratification of the 13th Amendment would have been in name only, a legal and constitutional myth."[7]

Lynch noted that Rhodes concluded that Reconstruction had failed. He disagreed, saying that not all its goals had been accomplished but that ratification of the 14th and 15th Amendments made it a success, as all people of color were granted citizenship, which could not be restricted by race or color, and they were granted suffrage nationally.[8] In 1913, Lynch published his own history of the era, titled, The Facts about Reconstruction.

Rhodes joined the American Historical Association and was elected its president in 1899 for a one-year term.

Legacy and honors

See also

References

  1. ↑ James Russell, "Lincoln’s Successor: President Andrew Johnson," in History Today 4 (1954), No. 9, p. 626
  2. ↑ Donald Sheehan/Harold C. Syrett, Essays in American Historiography, Papers presented in Honor of Allan Nevins. New York: 1960, p. 38
  3. ↑ Mark Antony De Wolfe Howe, James Ford Rhodes, American Historian (1929), pp. 21 and 24
  4. ↑ John R. Lynch, "Some Historical Errors of James Ford Rhodes", The Journal of Negro History, Vol. 2, No. 4, Oct., 1917
  5. ↑ Lynch (1917), "Errors", p.353
  6. ↑ Rhodes 1920
  7. ↑ Lynch (1917), "Error", pp. 362-363
  8. ↑ Lynch (1917), "Error", p. 365

Books by Rhodes

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Wednesday, February 17, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.