Joseph Deniker

Joseph Deniker

Joseph Deniker (6 March 1852 in Astrakhan – 18 March 1918 in Paris) was a French naturalist and anthropologist, known primarily for his attempts to develop highly detailed maps of race in Europe.

Life

Deniker was born in 1852 to French parents in Astrakhan, Russian Empire. He first studied at the university and technical institute of St. Petersburg, where he adopted engineering as a profession, and in this capacity traveled extensively in the petroleum districts of the Caucasus, in Central Europe, Italy and Dalmatia. Settling at Paris, France in 1876, he studied at the Sorbonne, where he received a doctorate in natural science in 1886. In 1888 he was appointed chief librarian of the Natural History Museum in Paris.

Deniker became one of the chief editors of the Dictionnaire de geographie universelle, and published many papers in the anthropological and zoological journals of France. In 1904 he was invited by the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain to give the Huxley Memorial Lecture. He died in Paris in 1918.

Deniker's classification system

Deniker's "Races de l'Europe" from 1899, listing as "principal races": Nordic, Littoral, Oriental, Dinaric, Iberic, Occidental and as "secondary races": Subnordic, Nord-Occidental, Vistulian, Subadriatic. Towards the north and east, boundaries to the territory settled by non-European races are shown: the Sami (Lap) (north), Eastern Finns (Finno-Ugrians) (east) and Turco-Mongols (east and south-east)

Deniker's complicated maps of European races, of which he sometimes counted upwards of twenty, were widely referenced in his day, if only to illustrate the extremes of arbitrary racial classification.^[1] Deniker had an extensive debate with another racial cartographer, William Z. Ripley, over the nature of race and the number of races. At the time, Ripley maintained that the peoples of Europe were composed of three main racial stocks, while Deniker held there were six primary European races (besides four secondary or subsidiary races). The six primary races are:

• Nordic, in the Germanic core territory in Scandinavia, Northern Germany and Frisia, the British Isles and the Baltic.
• Littoral or Atlanto-Mediterranean, in the Pyrenees and parts of Spain, western and southern France and north-western Italy
• Oriental; also called Eastern, in the Slavic core territory (Belarus, Ukraine and eastern Poland)
• Adriatic or Dinaric, around the Adriatic Sea, with widespread remnants in parts of France, Austria, Ukraine and Ciscaucasia.
• Ibero-Insular in the Iberian Peninsula, western France, southern Italy and the Mediterranean islands.
• Occidental (also called Cevenole); corresponding to Czekanowski's Lapponoid race, was supposedly the race of the paleolithic inhabitants of Europe, with scattered remnants throughout the continent

The four subtypes are:

• Sub-Nordic, on the fringes of Germanic settlement in southern Britain, Germany and the Baltic
• North-Occidental, in the contact zone of Celtic and Germanic, in the British Isles and northern France
• Vistulian, named for the Vistula, in the Germanic-Slavic contact zone in Poland
• Sub-Adriatic; corresponding to Ripley's Alpine race, was primarily met in the Alps and the historical Continental Celtic core territory

According to Jan Czekanowski, both Deniker and Ripley omitted the existence of Armenoid race, which Czekanowski claims to be one of the four main races of Europe, met especially among the Eastern and Southern Europeans.^[2] Deniker's most lasting contribution to the field of racial theory was the designation of one of his races as la race nordique. While this group had no special place in Deniker's racial model, this "Nordic race" would be elevated by the famous eugenicist and anthropologist Madison Grant in his Nordic theory to the engine of civilization. Grant adopted Ripley's three-race model for Europeans, but disliked Ripley's use of the "Teuton" for one of the races. Grant transliterated la race nordique into "Nordic", and promoted it to the top of his racial hierarchy in his own popular racial theory of the 1910s and 1920s.

Deniker proposed that the concept of race was too confusing, and instead proposed the use of the word "ethnic group" instead, which was later adopted prominently in the work of Julian Huxley and Alfred C. Haddon. Ripley argued that Deniker's idea of a race should be rather called a "type", since it was far less biologically rigid than most approaches to the question of race.

Selected works

• Recherches anatomiques et embryologiques sur les singes anthropoides (1886)
• Etude sur les Kalmouks (1883)
• Les Ghiliaks (1883)
• Races et peuples de la terre (1900)
• The races of man: an outline of anthropology and ethnography (1900)

The author abbreviation Deniker is used to indicate this individual as the author when citing a botanical name.^[3]

References

1. Ripley, William Z. (1899). "Deniker's Classification of the Races of Europe". The Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 28: 166–173. Retrieved 2016-01-22.
2. Czekanowski, Jan (1934). Człowiek w Czasie i Przestrzeni (eng. A Human in Time and Space) - The lexicon of biological anthropology. Kraków, Poland: Trzaska, Ewert i Michalski - Bibljoteka Wiedzy.
3. http://www.genres.de/CF/ipgri_cwr/demo/authors.cfm?searchVal=Deniker

• Arthur Keith and Alfred C. Haddon, "Obituary: Dr. Joseph Deniker" Man 18 (May 1918): 65-67.
• Ashley Montagu, "The Concept of Race," American Anthropologist 64:5 (October 1962): 919-928.

External links

• The races of man: an outline of anthropology and ethnography at the Internet Archive
• Les Ghiliaks at Gallica