Kinder der Landstrasse

Kinder der Landstrasse (literally: Children of the country road) was a project of the Swiss foundation Pro Juventute until the 1970s, of which the focus was among others to 'equalize' the Yeniche culture in Switzerland by removing about 590 children from their parents.

Excerpt

Kinder der Landstrasse, movie poster of 1992

From 1926 to 1973, the Swiss government had, according to the final report Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz – Zweiter Weltkrieg (Volume 23) of the Swiss parliamentary commission of that name, a semi-official policy of institutionalizing Yeniche parents and having their children adopted by more "normal" Swiss citizens, in an effort to eliminate Yeniche culture.[1] The name of this program, provided by the Swiss children-oriented Pro Juventute foundation, was Kinder der Landstrasse (literally: children of the country road). In all, about 590 children were taken from their parents and institutionalized in orphanages, mental institutions and even prisons.[2]

History

In 1926, Pro Juventute started – supported by the federal authorities and official institutions – systematically taking children away from Yeniche families living in Switzerland and placing them in foster homes, psychiatric hospitals and even prisons. This so-called "re-education" had the goal of establishing Yeniche families, and particularly the next generation, in a 'sedentary' lifestyle. After 47 years of those unremitting activities, the affected people obtained in 1973, with the support of the media, an end to these practices.[3]

Organization of the genocide

As the legal basis of the forced separation of families and children served the Swiss Civil Code (Zivilgesetzbuch) of 1912, by – at misfeasance behavior of parents, permanent risk or, more generally, neglect – the guardianship authorities were empowered, parents to take away the custody of their children. Although the Civil Code mentioned a supervision over the work of the authorities, it was widely ignored. Although the welfare authorities possessed the right parents to escape custody, such as the supervision in the mass application of the laws of the article, was nowhere determined. Crucial and sufficient was the 'legal fact', that the children were members of a traveling (=Yeniche) family, and thus a sufficient reason, to take away the children from their parents.[4]

Statutory basis for the "fund"

As a professionally-welfare justification generic psychiatric reports, which let the "Fund" the full control over his wards. The 'general scientific basis' for the attitude of those responsible functioneers was primarily the conviction of the harmfulness of family socialization "categorized as asocial families, as families who were traveling with origin per se". These fascist assumption informed at the same time in "hereditary biological notions of inferior 'genetic asocial material', whether sedentary or not, that will "damage the valuable heritage of the settled majority population, if its disclosure would not prevent."[4]

Proceeding by the officials

Therefore, the "charity" was anxious to detain children, both not sedentary and sedentary families, propelled implement of origin or in foreign families. Not a real driving lifestyle of the parents was the decisive criterion of a child removal, but "belonging to a collective wearer as socially damaging properties classified fringe group of tinker, basketters, scissor sharpener, beggars, "or worse". In some cases, children have been taken away from their mothers immediately after birth. The children were housed usually in homes, in some cases also in foreign families, in psychiatric hospitals and in prisons or assigned as forced child laborers to farming families. Contacts between children and parents were systematically prevented. Sometimes even the term of "charity ward" was changed to remain undetectable for their relatives. Child abuse was legitimized as education for work. In the 1930/40s the child removals peaked, resulting in more than Yeniche 200 children under the control of "charity".[5]

Among the protagonists of such population sanitary and racial hygiene concepts, namely psychiatrist Josef Jörgerstraße (canton of Graubünden with his psychiatric-eugenic writings on the fictitious "Family Zero" or the German eugenicists and self-proclaimed "Gypsy expert" Robert Ritter. Federal Heinrich Haberlin, Board of Trustees President Pro Juventute, described the Yeniche people in a brochure published in 1927 as "a dark spot in our culture on his order so proud Swiss countryside", which it applies to eliminate. The "charity" needed and found the support of dispensaries, teachers, pastors and non-profit organizations. The legislation opened maneuver, which were often but extensively used in different ways. The limits were exceeded to open illegality.[4][5]

Media are investigating in 1972

The scandal got in the even international focus before 1972, as the Beobachter newspaper's journalists investigated, after the newspaper got hints by affected Yeniche people, and as the first media, Hans Caprez published on 15 April 1972 in the article Kinder der Landstrasse the facts and the background involving in all about 590 children of the Yeniche people minority in Switzerland.[6]

Aftermath: public indignation but no consequences for responsible politicians

In the aftermath of the project, it was intensively discussed and condemned in Switzerland, as well as in several books and movies.[7]

Public pressure prompted Pro Juventute then after, to dissolve the "Fund" in spring 1973: Remaining guardianships were abolished or transferred to other persons. The Swiss authorities that had had co-initiated the "Fund" 37 years ago, was forced by the public disgust to pay financial compensation from 2000 to 7000 Swiss francs per victim. A prosecution of those responsible for the project, in particular of the two main actors Alfred Siegfried (1890-1972) and Clara Reust (1916-2000), as well as the person responsible in the guardianship authorities who did not fulfill their supervisory role, was never done.[8]

In 1975, for the first time, Yenich people were recognized as an independent ethnic group in the Canton of Bern, and since the 1980s, self-help organizations try to provide redress and rehabilitation of the slandered victims that even by pseudo-scientific programs were mistreated.[3]

Potentially genocide and UN-Convention of 1948 and Swiss law

The UN Genocide Convention, signed on 9 December 1948, qualifies forcibly transferring of children of a "national, ethnic, racial or religious group to another group" in the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, as a genocide.[9] This is followed by the Swiss criminal law in general in Art. 264 (Strafgesetzbuch) as ".... marked by their nationality, race, religion or ethnicity group".[10] The most relevant fact, whether the Yeniche people are one of the groups the convention respectively Swiss law are attributable, is affirmed by parts of the recent scientific work,[11] and at least will further have to be discussed in the public, also in the context to Child labour in Switzerland.

Rehabilitation

A governmental redress was promised after years of public reparation, a proper rehabilitation besides an apology by the government (Bundesrat), however not so far, and there only "emergency" payments were made at a ridiculously low level of each several thousand Swiss Francs to the meanwhile old-aged surviving victims of Kinder der Landstrasse.

Naschet Jenische

The foundation Naschet Jenische (literally: arise, Yeniche!) was established in 1986, focussing on the refurbishment and 'reparations' of the injustice perpetrated against the Yeniche (Fahrende) people in Switzerland, in particular by the programm Kinder der Landstrasse. In 1988 a fund commission, which regulated the inspection for the affected Yeniche people, was established and completed their work in 1992.[11] The inspection of the files of Pro Juventute is governed since then directly by the Swiss Federal Archives (Bundesarchiv). The affeced Yeniche people received in all 11 million Swiss Francs, but not more than 20,000 Swiss Francs each. The advice and support of people and families affected by Kinder der Landstrasse is still the main focus of the activities of the foundation. The foundation advises Yeniche people in personal, family and social problems, in particular in contacts with the Swiss authorities, and assists in the inspection of personal files. The foundation also supports the search and the reuninicfaction of families. Yeniche people are assisted with applications for financial assistance to public and private institutions. Advice can be also invoked in the case of difficulties with insurance and taxes. The consultancy activity is financed by Pro Juventute. Another important part of the foundation's activities are the public relations; Naschet Jenische informs about the history and the current situation in Switzerland and arbitrates contacts.[12]

Wiedergutmachungsinitiative

From April 2014 to October 2014 signatures for the Swiss national Wiedergutmachungsinitiative (literally: reparation initiative) will be collected. But that Volksinitiative primarily tries to take care of the fates of the so-called Verdingkinder (literally: forced child laborers), another 'integration project' related to 'misplaced persons' which were placed as cheap labour at Swiss farms, among them also Yeniche juveniles affected by "Kinder der Landstrasse", but not their families. The initiative, incidentally started by an inter-political committee as there were missing adequate measurements by the governmental authorities, includes:

Cinema and television (excerpt)

See also

Literature (excerpt)

References

  1. ↑ Thomas Huonker, Regula Ludi (2001). "Roma, Sinti und Jenische. Schweizerische Zigeunerpolitik zur Zeit des Nationalsozialismus. Beitrag zur Forschung (Veröffentlichungen der UEK, Band 23)" (PDF) (in German). UEK, Swiss Government. Retrieved 2014-11-13.
  2. ↑ Le Temps (Geneva), December 12, 2007, "Le passé enfin écrit des enfants enlevés en Suisse", an historical study spanning the years from 1926 to 1973.
  3. 1 2 Hansjörg Roth (2008-03-08). "Jenische" (in German). HDS. Retrieved 2014-11-15.
  4. 1 2 3 Thomas Huonker: Ein dunkler Fleck. In: Merken was läuft. Rassismus im Visier. Pestalozzianum, Zürich 2009, ISBN 978-3-03755-105-9.
  5. 1 2 Thomas Huonker and Ludi, under participation of Bernhard Schär (2000). "Roma, Sinti und Jenische. Beiheft zum Bericht "Die Schweiz und die Flüchtlinge zur Zeit des Nationalsozialismus"" (in German). Unabhängige Expertenkommission "Schweiz – Zweiter Weltkrieg". ISBN 3-908661-12-9. Retrieved 2014-11-14.
  6. ↑ Dominique Strebel and Christoph Schilling (2007-01-03). ""Kinder der Landstrasse": Der Kinderklau" (in German). Beobachter 1/2007. Retrieved 2014-11-14.
  7. ↑ Dominik Gross (2009-06-04). "Fahrende: Zwischen "Landstrasse" und Aktendeckeln" (in German). WOZ Die Wochenzeitung 23/2009. Retrieved 2014-11-13.
  8. ↑ Thomas Guss (2009-10-13). "Kinderarbeit" (in German). HDS. Retrieved 2014-11-15.
  9. ↑ "UNO-Konvention über die Verhütung und Bestrafung des Völkermords" (in German). United Nations. 1948. Retrieved 2014-11-14.
  10. ↑ "Schweizerisches Strafgesetzbuch" (in German). Schweizerische Eidgenossenschaft. Retrieved 2014-11-14.
  11. 1 2 Walter Leimgruber, Thomas Meier, Roger Sablonier. "Das Hilfswerk für die Kinder der Landstrasse. Historische Studie aufgrund der Akten der Stiftung Pro Juventute im Schweizerischen Bundesarchiv. Bundesarchiv Dossier 9. Bern 1998, ISBN 3-908-439-00-0 (PDF; 217 MB)" (in German). Bundesarchiv Schweizerische Eidgenossenschaft. Retrieved 2014-11-14.
  12. ↑ "Naschet Jenische" (in German). stiftung-fahrende.ch. Retrieved 2014-11-21.
  13. ↑ "Wiedergutmachungsinitiative" (in German). wiedergutmachung.ch. 2014. Retrieved 2014-11-15.
  14. ↑ "Prof.Dr. Roger Sablonier, Publikationen" (in German). University of Zürich, Historisches Seminar. Retrieved 2014-11-15.
  15. ↑ "Bundesamt für Kultur: Begriffserklärung" (in German). Schweizerische Eidgenossenschaft. Retrieved 2014-11-15.

External links

among others:

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Sunday, January 24, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.