Leiden Riddle

The Leiden Riddle is an Old English riddle. It is noteworthy for being:

• one of our earliest attested pieces of English poetry;
• one of only a small number of representatives of the Northumbrian dialect of Old English;
• one of only a relatively small number of Old English poems to survive in multiple manuscripts;
• evidence for the translation of the poetry of Aldhelm into Old English.

Text

Aldhelm’s lorica	The Leiden Riddle (dots indicating lost letters)	Exeter Book Riddle 33/35
Roscida me genuit gelido de uiscere tellus; Non sum setigero lanarum uellere facta, Licia nulla trahunt nec garrula fila resultant Nec crocea Seres texunt lanugine uermes Nec radiis carpor duro nec pectine pulsor; Et tamen en 'uestis' uulgi sermone uocabor. Spicula non uereor longis exempta faretris.[1]	Mec se uēta uong, uundrum frēorig, ob his innaðae aerest cændæ. Ni uaat ic mec biuorthæ uullan fliusum, hērum ðerh hēhcraeft, hygiðonc.... Uundnae mē ni bīað ueflæ, ni ic uarp hafæ, ni ðerih ðreatun giðraec ðrēt mē hlimmith, ne mē hrūtendu hrīsil scelfath, ni mec ōuana aam sceal cnyssa. Uyrmas mec ni āuēfun uyrdi craeftum, ðā ði geolu gōdueb geatum fraetuath. Uil mec huethrae suae ðēh uīdæ ofaer eorðu hātan mith hæliðum hyhtlic giuǣde; ni anoegun ic mē aerigfaerae egsan brōgum, ðēh ði n... ...n sīæ nīudlicae ob cocrum.[2]	Mec se wǣta wong, wundrum frēorig, of his innaþe ǣrist cende. Ne wāt ic mec beworhtne wulle flȳsum, hǣrum þurh hēahcræft, hygeþoncum mīn. Wundene mē ne bēoð wefle, ne ic wearp hafu, ne þurh þreata geþræcu þrǣd mē ne hlimmeð, ne æt mē hrūtende hrīsil scrīþeð, ne mec ōhwonan sceal ām cnyssan. Wyrmas mec ne āwǣfan wyrda cræftum, þā þe geolo gōdwebb geatwum frætwað. Wile mec mon hwæþre seþēah wīde ofer eorþan hātan for hæleþum hyhtlic gewǣde. Saga sōðcwidum, searoþoncum glēaw, wordum wīsfæst, hwæt þis gewǣde sȳ.[3]
The damp earth produced me from her cold womb; I am not made from the rasping fleece of wool, no leashes pull [me] nor garrulous threads reverberate, nor do Oriental worms weave [me] with yellow down, nor am I plucked by shuttles nor beaten by the hard reed; and yet I will be called a coat in the common speech. I do not fear arrows pulled out from long quivers.[4]	The wet ground, incredibly cold, first produced me from its innards. I do not know myself in my mind's considerations to be made with wool from fleeces, from hair through great skill. There are no woofs woven in me, nor do I have warps, nor does thread resound in me through the thrusting of pressers, nor do whizzing shuttles shake in me, nor must the sley knock me anywhere. Worms did not weave me with the skills of the fates, those which adorn the costly yellow cloth with decorations. But nevertheless, widely across the earth, I am wont to be called desirable clothing amongst heroes. Nor do I dread terror from the peril of a flight of arrows, though it might be taken eagerly from the quivers.[5]	The wet ground, incredibly cold, first produced me from its innards. I do not know myself in my mind's considerations to be made with wool from fleeces, from hair through great skill. There are no woofs woven in me, nor do I have warps, nor does thread resound in me through the thrustings of pressers, nor does whizzing shuttle glide in me, nor must the sley knock me anywhere. Worms did not weave me with the skills of the fates, those which adorn the costly yellow cloth with decorations. But nevertheless, widely across the earth, I am wont to be called desirable clothing amongst heroes. Person clever in your ideas, wise in your words, say in truthful utterance what this clothing might be.[6]

Manuscript

The Leiden Riddle is attested in MS Leiden, Bibliotheek der Rijksuniversiteit, Voccius Lat. 4o 106, where it accompanies the Latin text on which it is based. The manuscript was described by Herbert Dean Merritt thus:

25 leaves, Riddles of Symphosius and Aldhelm, ninth century. At the end of the Riddles, folio 25v, is the well-known Leiden Riddle in Old English. On folio 10r, in a space [xviii] at the end of chapter headings, are written in the hand of the text the Old English glosses to nymph names.^[7]

The manuscript was probably copied in western France, perhaps at Fleury Abbey. The riddle was added after the completion of the main contents, fairly certainly at Fleury Abbey, in the tenth century, but the language of the text is older, of the eighth century. It was already hard to read by the earlier nineteenth century, and was further damaged by the librarian, Willem George Pluygers, who in 1864 applied reagents to the text in an attempt to make it more legible.^[8]

Literary origins and character of the text

The West Saxon aristocrat, monk, scholar, and poet Aldhelm (c. 639–709) composed, among many other works, a set of one hundred hexametrical 'enigmata' or 'enigmas', inspired by the so-called Riddles of Symphosius. The thirty-third was Lorica ('corselet'). This was translated into Old English, and first witnessed in the Northumbrian dialect of Old English as the Leiden Riddle; the language is of the seventh or eighth century.^[9] Unusually, the riddle is also attested, in West Saxon, among the Old English riddles of the later tenth-century Exeter Book, where it is number 33 or 35 (depending on the edition consulted). Apart from differences in language caused by dialect and date, and damage to the Leiden manuscript, the texts are the identical on all but a couple of points.^[10]

The translation has been praised for its complexity and wit. In the assessment of Thomas Klein,

The spirit behind this rewritten riddle may be best exemplified by a pun in the penultimate line of the Exeter Book version. In the manner of other riddles, the riddle dares us to find the solution, calling the reader searoþoncum gleaw, 'clever with cunning thoughts'. As a separate word, searo has several competing senses. It may designate either a 'device' or the intellectual power that created such a device. But more specifically, searo can mean 'armour'--so the pun reads, 'clever with thoughts of armour'.^[11]

Linguistic origins and character of the text

The Leiden Riddle is an unusually archaic example of Old English, and one of relatively few representatives of its Northumbrian dialect. This is easily shown through comparison between the Leiden Riddle and the later, West Saxon copy in the Exeter Book:

The differences between these two copies are ample testament to the distances in time and space that separate them. Several are relatively superficial, representing different conventions for the spelling of what was in fact the same sound: eg. Leiden's typically early ⟨u⟩, ⟨th⟩ and ⟨b⟩, frequently appearing for Exeter ⟨w⟩ (the Anglo-Saxon letter 'wynn'), ⟨þ⟩ and ⟨f⟩. Reflecting a distinct pronunciation are the Leiden forms ueta (1), herum (4) and auefun (9), whose ⟨e⟩ versus Exeter ⟨æ⟩ represents one of the most important dialect divisions between West Saxon and Anglian; similarly significant are the vowels in, e.g., Leiden heh (4) rather than heah, uarp (5) as opposed to wearp, biað (5) next to beoð, and so on. In general, there is a far greater range of unaccented vowels in Leiden, another feature of an early date (before these merged; compare, e.g., innaðae (2) with innaðe, hlimmith (6) with hlimmeð); and some important differences in inflexional endings (viz. Leiden's early preterite plural auefun (9), Exeter's late awæfan).^[12]

References

1. Fr. Glorie (ed.), Variae collectiones aenignmatvm Merovingicae aetatis (pars altera), Corpvs Christianorvm, Series Latina, 133a (Turnholt: Brepols, 1968), p. 417 (Riddle 33).
2. M. B. Parkes, ‘The Manuscript of the Leiden Riddle’, Anglo-Saxon England, 1 (1972), 207–17 (p. 208); DOI: 10.1017/S0263675100000168. Length-marks added to Parkes's transcription on the basis of John R. Clark Hall, A Concise Anglo-Saxon Dictionary, 4th rev. edn by Herbet D. Meritt (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1960).
3. C. Williamson (ed.), The Old English Riddles of the Exeter Book (Chapel Hill, 1977), pp. 88-89 (Riddle 33). Lenth-marks added to Williamson's edition on the basis of John R. Clark Hall, A Concise Anglo-Saxon Dictionary, 4th rev. edn by Herbet D. Meritt (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1960).
4. Thomas Klein, ‘The Old English Translation of Aldhelm’s Riddle Lorica’, The Review of English Studies, n. s., 48 (1997), 345–49 (p. 345).
5. Richard Dance, 'The Old English Language and the Alliterative Tradition', in A Companion to Medieval Poetry, ed. by Corinne Saunders (Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010), pp. 34-50 (pp. 40-41).
6. Richard Dance, 'The Old English Language and the Alliterative Tradition', in A Companion to Medieval Poetry, ed. by Corinne Saunders (Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010), pp. 34-50 (pp. 40-41).
7. Meritt, Herbert Dean (ed.), Old English Glosses: A Collection, The Modern Language Association of America, General Series, 16 (London, 1945), pp. xvii-xviii.
8. M. B. Parkes, ‘The Manuscript of the Leiden Riddle’, Anglo-Saxon England, 1 (1972), 207–17 (pp. 210-17); DOI: 10.1017/S0263675100000168.
9. Alaric Hall, Elves in Anglo-Saxon England: Matters of Belief, Health, Gender and Identity, Anglo-Saxon Studies, 8 (Woodbridge: Boydell, 2007), p. 79.
10. Thomas Klein, ‘The Old English Translation of Aldhelm’s Riddle Lorica’, The Review of English Studies, n. s., 48 (1997), 345–49 (p. 345).
11. Thomas Klein, ‘The Old English Translation of Aldhelm’s Riddle Lorica’, The Review of English Studies, n. s., 48 (1997), 345–49 (p. 349).
12. Richard Dance, 'The Old English Language and the Alliterative Tradition', in A Companion to Medieval Poetry, ed. by Corinne Saunders (Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010), pp. 34-50 (p. 41).