Sarcopterygii

Lobe-finned fishes Temporal range: Late Silurian - Present, 418–0 Ma PreЄ Є O S D C P T J K Pg N
Coelacanth
Scientific classification
Kingdom:	Animalia
Phylum:	Chordata
Superclass*:	Osteichthyes
Class:	Sarcopterygii Romer, 1955
Subgroups
Actinistia - coelacanths & relatives †Onychodontiformes Rhipidistia Dipnomorpha - lungfish & relatives Tetrapodomorpha - four-limbed vertebrates

The Sarcopterygii /ˌsɑːrkɒptəˈrɪdʒi.aɪ/ or lobe-finned fish (from Greek σαρξ sarx, flesh, and πτερυξ pteryx, fin) – sometimes considered synonymous with Crossopterygii ("fringe-finned fish", from Greek κροσσός krossos, fringe) – constitute a clade (traditionally a class or subclass) of the bony fish, though a strict cladistic view includes the terrestrial vertebrates. The living sarcopterygians are the coelacanths and lungfish; additionally, all tetrapods are sarcopterygians or descendants of them.

Characteristics

Guiyu oneiros, the earliest known bony fish, lived during the Late Silurian, 419 million years ago).^[1][2] It has the combination of both ray-finned and lobe-finned features, although analysis of the totality of its features place it closer to lobe-finned fish.^[3][4][5][6]

Early lobe-finned fishes are bony fish with fleshy, lobed, paired fins, which are joined to the body by a single bone.^[7] The fins of lobe-finned fishes differ from those of all other fish in that each is borne on a fleshy, lobelike, scaly stalk extending from the body. The scales of sarcopterygians are true scaloids, consisting of lamellar bone surrounded by layers of vascular bone, dentine-like cosmine, and external keratin.^[8] Pectoral and pelvic fins have articulations resembling those of tetrapod limbs. These fins evolved into the legs of the first tetrapod land vertebrates, amphibians. They also possess two dorsal fins with separate bases, as opposed to the single dorsal fin of actinopterygians (ray-finned fish). The braincase of sarcopterygians primitively has a hinge line, but this is lost in tetrapods and lungfish. Many early sarcopterygians have a symmetrical tail. All sarcopterygians possess teeth covered with true enamel.

Most species of lobe-finned fishes are extinct. The largest known lobe-finned fish was Rhizodus hibberti from the Carboniferous period of Scotland which may have exceeded 7 meters in length. Among the two groups of extant (living) species, the coelacanths and the lungfishes, the largest species is the West Indian Ocean coelacanth, reaching 2 m (6.5 ft) in length and weighing up 110 kg (240 lb). The largest lungfish is the African lungfish which can reach 2 m (6.6 ft) in length and weigh up to 50 kg (110 lb).^[9][10]

Classification

Taxonomists who subscribe to the cladistic approach include the grouping Tetrapoda within this group, which in turn consists of all species of four-limbed vertebrates.^[11] The fin-limbs of lobe-finned fishes such as the coelacanths show a strong similarity to the expected ancestral form of tetrapod limbs. The lobe-finned fishes apparently followed two different lines of development and are accordingly separated into two subclasses, the Rhipidistia (including the Dipnoi, the lungfish, and the Tetrapodomorpha which include the Tetrapoda) and the Actinistia (coelacanths).

Taxonomy

The classification below follows Benton 2004, and uses a synthesis of rank-based Linnaean taxonomy and also reflects evolutionary relationships. Benton included the Superclass Tetrapoda in the Subclass Sarcopterygii in order to reflect the direct descent of tetrapods from lobe-finned fish, despite the former being assigned a higher taxonomic rank.^[12]

Actinistia	West Indian Ocean coelacanth	Actinistia, coelacanths, are a subclass of mostly fossil lobe-finned fishes. This subclass contains the coelacanths, including the two living coelacanths, the West Indian Ocean coelacanth and the Indonesian coelacanth.
Dipnoi	Queensland lungfish	Dipnoi, lungfish, also known as salamanderfish,[13] are a subclass of freshwater fish. Lungfish are best known for retaining characteristics primitive within the bony fishes, including the ability to breathe air, and structures primitive within the lobe-finned fishes, including the presence of lobed fins with a well-developed internal skeleton. Today, lungfish live only in Africa, South America, and Australia. While vicariance would suggest this represents an ancient distribution limited to the Mesozoic supercontinent Gondwana, the fossil record suggests advanced lungfish had a widespread freshwater distribution and the current distribution of modern lungfish species reflects extinction of many lineages following the breakup of Pangaea, Gondwana, and Laurasia.
Tetrapodomorpha	Advanced tetrapodomorph Tiktaalik	Tetrapodomorpha, tetrapods and their extinct relatives, are a clade of vertebrates consisting of tetrapods (four-limbed vertebrates) and their closest sarcopterygian relatives that are more closely related to living tetrapods than to living lungfish. Advanced forms transitional between fish and the early labyrinthodonts, like Tiktaalik, have been referred to as "fishapods" by their discoverers, being half-fish, half-tetrapods, in appearance and limb morphology. The Tetrapodomorpha contain the crown group tetrapods (the last common ancestor of living tetrapods and all of its descendants) and several groups of early stem tetrapods, and several groups of related lobe-finned fishes, collectively known as the osteolepiforms. The Tetrapodamorpha minus the crown group Tetrapoda are the Stem Tetrapoda, a paraphyletic unit encompassing the fish to tetrapod transition. Among the characters defining tetrapodomorphs are modifications to the fins, notably a humerus with convex head articulating with the glenoid fossa (the socket of the shoulder joint). Tetrapodomorph fossils are known from the early Devonian onwards, and include Osteolepis, Panderichthys, Kenichthys, and Tungsenia.[14]

A modern coelacanth, Latimeria chalumnae

Queensland lungfish

• Subclass Sarcopterygii
  • †Order Onychodontida
  • Order Actinistia
  • Infraclass Dipnomorpha
    • †Order Porolepiformes
    • Subclass Dipnoi
      • Order Ceratodontiformes
      • Order Lepidosireniformes
  • Infraclass Tetrapodomorpha
    • †Order Rhizodontida
    • Superorder Osteolepidida
      • †Order Osteolepiformes
        • †Family Tristichopteridae
      • †Order Panderichthyida
      • Superclass Tetrapoda

Phylogeny

The cladogram presented below is based on studies compiled by Philippe Janvier and others for the Tree of Life Web Project,^[15] Mikko's Phylogeny Archive ^[16] and Swartz 2012.^[17]

Sarcopterygii

†Onychodontidae Actinistia (coelacanths) Rhipidistia †Styloichthys changae Zhu & Yu 2002 Dipnomorpha †Porolepiformes Dipnoi (lungfishes) Tetrapodomorpha ?†Tungsenia paradoxa Lu et al. 2012 †Kenichthys campbelli Chang & Zhu 1993 †Rhizodontiformes ?†Thysanolepidae †Canowindridae †Osteolepiformes Eotetrapodiformes †Tristichopteridae †Tinirau clackae Swartz 2012 †Platycephalichthys Vorobyeva 1959 Elpistostegalia †Panderichthys rhombolepis Gross 1941 †Elpistostegidae Stegocephalia †Elginerpetonidae †Metaxygnathus denticulus Campbell & Bell 1977 †Ventastega curonica Tetrapoda s.s.

• Sarcopterygii incertae sedis
  • †Guiyu oneiros Zhu et al. 2009
  • †Diabolepis speratus (Chang & Yu 1984)
  • †Langdenia campylognatha Janvier & Phuong 1999
  • †Ligulalepis Schultze 1968
  • †Meemannia eos Zhu, Yu, Wang, Zhao & Jia 2006
  • †Psarolepis romeri Yu 1998 sensu Zhu, Yu, Wang, Zhao & Jia 2006
• Paraphyletic Osteolepida incertae sedis [taxa not treated by Ahlberg & Johanson, 1998]:
  • †Bogdanovia orientalis Obrucheva 1955 [has been treated as Coelacanthinimorph sarcopterygian]
  • †Canningius groenlandicus Säve-Söderbergh 1937
  • †Chrysolepis [non Chrysolepis (chinquapins), a genus of fabaceaen plants (Fabaceae)]
  • †Geiserolepis
  • †Latvius
    • †L. grewingki (Gross 1933)
    • †L. porosus Jarvik 1948
    • †L. obrutus Vorobyeva 1977
  • †Lohsania utahensis Vaughn 1962
  • †Megadonichthys kurikae Vorobyeva 1962
  • †Platyethmoidia antarctica Young, Long & Ritchie 1992
  • †Shirolepis ananjevi Vorobeva 1977
  • †Sterropterygion brandei Thomson 1972
  • †Thaumatolepis edelsteini Obruchev 1941
• Paraphyletic Elpistostegalia/Panderichthyida incertae sedis
  • †Parapanderichthys stolbovi (Vorobyeva 1960) Vorobyeva 1992
  • †Howittichthys warrenae Long & Holland 2008
  • †Livoniana multidentata Ahlberg, Luksevic & Mark-Kurik 2000
• Stegocephalia incertae sedis
  • †Antlerpeton clarkii Thomson, Shubin & Poole 1998
  • †Austrobrachyops jenseni Colbert & Cosgriff 1974
  • †Broilisaurus raniceps (Goldenberg 1873) Kuhn 1938
  • †Densignathus rowei Daeschler 2000
  • †Doragnathus woodi Smithson 1980
  • †Jakubsonia livnensis Lebedev 2004
  • †Limnerpeton dubium Fritsch 1901 (nomen dubium)
  • †Limnosceloides Romer 1952
    • †L. dunkardensis Romer 1952 (Type)
    • †L. brahycoles Langston 1966
  • †Occidens portlocki Clack & Ahlberg 2004
  • †Ossinodus puerorum emend Warren & Turner 2004
  • †Romeriscus periallus Baird & Carroll 1968
  • †Sigournea multidentata Bolt & Lombard 2006
  • †Sinostega pani Zhu et al.2002
  • †Ymeria denticulata Clack et al. 2012

Evolution

Evolution of lobe-finned fishes

Spindle diagram for the evolution of lobe-finned fishes, tetrapods and other vertebrate classes.^[18]

In Late Devonian vertebrate speciation, descendants of pelagic lobe-finned fish — like Eusthenopteron — exhibited a sequence of adaptations:

• Panderichthys, suited to muddy shallows;
• Tiktaalik with limb-like fins that could take it onto land;
• Early tetrapods in weed-filled swamps, such as:
  • Acanthostega, which had feet with eight digits,
  • Ichthyostega with limbs.

Descendants also included pelagic lobe-finned fish such as coelacanth species.

Lobe-finned fishes (sarcopterygians) and their relatives the ray-finned fishes (actinopterygians) comprise the superclass of bony fishes (Osteichthyes) characterized by their bony skeleton rather than cartilage. There are otherwise vast differences in fin, respiratory, and circulatory structures between the Sarcopterygii and the Actinopterygii, such as the presence of cosmoid layers in the scales of sarcopterygians. The earliest fossils of sarcopterygians, found in the uppermost Silurian (ca 418 Ma), closely resembled the acanthodians (the "spiny fish", a taxon that became extinct at the end of the Paleozoic). In the early–middle Devonian (416 - 385 Ma), while the predatory placoderms dominated the seas, some sarcopterygians came into freshwater habitats.

In the Early Devonian (416 - 397 Mya), the sarcopterygians split into two main lineages — the coelacanths and the rhipidistians. Coelacanths never left the oceans and their heyday was the late Devonian and Carboniferous, from 385 to 299 Ma, as they were more common during those periods than in any other period in the Phanerozoic; coelacanths still live today in the oceans (genus Latimeria).

The Rhipidistians, whose ancestors probably lived in the oceans near the river mouths (estuaries), left the ocean world and migrated into freshwater habitats. They in turn split into two major groups: the lungfish and the tetrapodomorphs. The lungfish's greatest diversity was in the Triassic period; today there are fewer than a dozen genera left. The lungfish evolved the first proto-lungs and proto-limbs; developing the ability to live outside a water environment in the middle Devonian (397 - 385 Ma).

There are three major hypotheses as to how they evolved their stubby fins (proto-limbs). The traditional explanation is the "shrinking waterhole hypothesis" or "desert hypothesis" posited by the American paleontologist Alfred Romer. He believed that limbs and lungs may have evolved from the necessity of having to find new bodies of water as old waterholes dried up.^[19]

The second hypothesis is the "inter-tidal hypothesis" put forward in 2010 by a team of Polish paleontologists (Grzegorz Niedźwiedzki, Piotr Szrek, Katarzyna Narkiewicz, Marek Narkiewicz, & Per Ahlberg). They argued that sarcopterygians may have first emerged unto land from intertidal zones rather than inland bodies of water. Their hypothesis is based on the discovery of the 395 million-year-old Zachełmie tracks in Zachełmie, Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship, Poland, the oldest ever discovered fossil evidence of tetrapods.^[20][21]

The third hypothesis is dubbed the "woodland hypothesis" and was proposed by the American paleontologist Greg Retallack in 2011. He argues that limbs may have developed in shallow bodies of water in woodlands as a means of navigating in environments filled with roots and vegetation. He based his conclusions on the evidence that transitional tetrapod fossils are consistently found in habitats that were formerly humid and wooded floodplains.^[19][22]

The first tetrapodomorphs, which included the gigantic rhizodonts, had the same general anatomy as the lungfish, who were their closest kin, but they appear not to have left their water habitat until the late Devonian epoch (385 - 359 Ma), with the appearance of tetrapods (four-legged vertebrates). Tetrapods are the only tetrapodomorphs which survived after the Devonian.

Non-tetrapod sarcopterygians continued until towards the end of Paleozoic era, suffering heavy losses during the Permian-Triassic extinction event (251 Ma).

See also

• List of Sarcopterygii

References

Citations

1. "PALAEOBLOG".
2. "Descubrimiento de fósil de pez óseo en China aporta nuevos conocimientos clave sobre origen de los vertebrados_Spanish.china.org.cn".
3. Zhu, M; Zhao, W; Jia, L; Lu, J; Qiao, T; Qu, Q (2009). "The oldest articulated osteichthyan reveals mosaic gnathostome characters". Nature 458: 469–474. doi:10.1038/nature07855. PMID 19325627.
4. Coates, M.I. (2009). "Palaeontology: Beyond the Age of Fishes". Nature 458: 413–414. doi:10.1038/458413a. PMID 19325614.
5. Post details: Critical transitions in fish evolution lack fossil documentation Science Literature, 27 March 2009.
6. PharyngulaScience blogs, 1 April 2009.
7. Clack, J. A. (2002) Gaining Ground. Indiana University
8. Kardong, Kenneth V. (1998). Vertebrates: Comparative Anatomy, Function, Evolution, second edition, USA: McGraw-Hill, 747 pp.. ISBN 0-07-115356-X/0-697-28654-1.
9. Froese, Rainer, and Daniel Pauly, eds. (2009). "Lepidosirenidae" in FishBase. January 2009 version.
10. Protopterus aethiopicus. Fishing-worldrecords.com
11. Nelson 2006.
12. Benton, M.J. (2004). Vertebrate Paleontology. 3rd ed. Blackwell Science Ltd
13. Ernst Heinrich Philipp August Haeckel, Edwin Ray Lankester, L. Dora Schmitz (1892). The History of Creation, Or, The Development of the Earth and Its Inhabitants by the Action of Natural Causes: A Popular Exposition of the Doctrine of Evolution in General, and of that of Darwin, Goethe, and Lamarck in Particular : from the 8. German Ed. of Ernst Haeckel. D. Appleton. p. 422. page 289
14. Jing Lu, Min Zhu, John A. Long, Wenjin Zhao, Tim J. Senden, Liantao Jia and Tuo Qiao (2012). "The earliest known stem-tetrapod from the Lower Devonian of China". Nature Communications 3: 1160. Bibcode:2012NatCo...3E1160L. doi:10.1038/ncomms2170. PMID 23093197.
15. Janvier, Philippe. 1997. Vertebrata. Animals with backbones. Version 01 January 1997 (under construction). http://tolweb.org/Vertebrata/14829/1997.01.01 in The Tree of Life Web Project, http://tolweb.org/
16. Haaramo, Mikko (2003). "Sarcopterygii". in Mikko's Phylogeny Archive. Retrieved November 4, 2013.
17. Swartz, B. (2012). "A marine stem-tetrapod from the Devonian of Western North America". PLoS ONE 7 (3): e33683. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0033683. PMC 3308997. PMID 22448265.
18. Benton 2005.
19. "Fish-Tetrapod Transition Got A New Hypothesis In 2011". Science 2.0. December 27, 2011. Retrieved January 2, 2012.
20. Grzegorz Niedźwiedzki, Piotr Szrek, Katarzyna Narkiewicz, Marek Narkiewicz & Per E. Ahlberg (2010). "Tetrapod trackways from the early Middle Devonian period of Poland". Nature (Nature Publishing Group) 463 (7277): 43–48. Bibcode:2010Natur.463...43N. doi:10.1038/nature08623. PMID 20054388. Retrieved January 3, 2012.
21. Shanta Barley (January 6, 2010). "Oldest footprints of a four-legged vertebrate discovered". New Scientist. Retrieved January 3, 2010.
22. Retallack, Gregory (May 2011). "Woodland Hypothesis for Devonian Tetrapod Evolution". Journal of geology (University of Chicago Press) 119 (3): 235–258. Bibcode:2011JG....119..235R. doi:10.1086/659144.

Bibliography

• Nelson, Joseph S. (2006). Fishes of the World. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 0-471-25031-7