Lockheed Propulsion Company

The Lockheed Propulsion Company was a division of the Lockheed Aircraft Corporation located at 1500 Crafton Avenue in the Mentone, California area northeast of Redlands, California, adjacent to the Santa Ana River, from 1961 to 1975. It developed, tested and produced solid rocket motors and propellant used in military and National Aeronautics and Space Administration applications.

The site consists of approximately 400 acres which was leased from the City of Redlands. The predecessor Grand Central Rocket Company facility was used for the production, testing and disposal of solid rocket propellant used in rocket engines. Lockheed used the facility for research and for production of solid fuel rockets for military and commercial use until 1974.[1]

History

The Lockheed Propulsion Company was originally founded in 1952 as the Grand Central Rocket Company by Major C. C. Moseley, co-founder of Western Airlines [2] and Charles E. Bartley, the inventor of rubber-based solid rocket fuel propellants.[3] Grand Central was sold in 1961 to become the Lockheed Propulsion Company as a research and production facility of solid fuel rockets and solid rocket propellant.[1]

The Redlands plant provided the ABL X-248 Altair third stage [4] of the Explorer I satellite launch vehicle in 1958. Grand Central signed a contract to produce the solid rocket motor for the Project Mercury escape tower. This motor was ultimately produced by Lockheed when the Redlands plant was sold to Lockheed Aircraft Corporation.[5]

Between 1966 and 1975, the Boeing Company sub-contracted with Lockheed Propulsion Company for propellants used in the AGM-69 short-range attack missile.[6]

For the Apollo program, Lockheed Propulsion Company provided both the Launch Escape Motor and the Pitch Control Motor of the emergency escape tower atop the Apollo command module, using propellant made of polysulfides.[7][8]

On 27 January 1972, the Marshall Spaceflight Center selected Aerojet-General, Lockheed Propulsion Company, Thiokol Chemical Company, and United Technology Center to study the use of 120-inch and 156-inch solid motors as part of the Space Shuttle booster package.[9] Thiokol was ultimately selected as the solid rocket booster provider on 20 November 1973. In January 1974, Lockheed protested to the General Accounting Office (GAO) NASA's selection of Thiokol as designer of the SRB. Because of the protest, NASA issued Thiokol a 90-day study contract on 13 February so the firm could continue its work while GAO studied the situation. The study contract was extended again on 20 May for 45 days. In May 1975, NASA confirmed the Thiokol SRB contract.[9]

With the end of the Apollo project contracts, and no orders for the Space Shuttle program, as well as the conclusion of the AGM-69 SRAM project, Lockheed Propulsion Company was closed and sold in 1975.[6]

Environmental pollution

"In the 1980s, trichloroethylene (TCE), a solvent, was detected in four out of twelve groundwater wells sampled in the Redlands area. The Division of Drinking Water and Environmental Management (DDW) within the California Department of Health Services CDHS, directed that any drinking water wells which contained TCE at levels exceeding 5 parts per billion (ppb) or the maximum contaminant level (MCL), be taken off-line. In 1989, as a result of the TCE contamination, the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB), Santa Ana Region, and the Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC) provided funding for the installation of a Liquid Phase Granular Activated Carbon (GAC) groundwater treatment system to treat and clean the water from the TCE impacted wells. Subsequent investigations by the CRWQCB determined that Lockheed Martin Corporation (formerly Lockheed Propulsion Company) was the source of the TCE contamination. TCE had been the primary contaminant of concern emanating from the Lockheed site, until mid-1997 when the first tests for perchlorate in drinking water were performed." [1]

In 1997, ammonium perchlorate was discovered in a number of domestic water supply wells that serve several water purveyors throughout San Bernardino and Riverside counties. Two of the wells in the City of Loma Linda's municipal drinking water system had been impacted by the perchlorate groundwater plume, originating from the Lockheed site.[1] Perchlorate adversely affects human health by interfering with iodine uptake into the thyroid gland. In adults, the thyroid gland helps regulate the metabolism by releasing hormones, while in children, the thyroid helps in proper development.[10]

Some 800 residents in the Redlands community subsequently filed suit against Lockheed, alleging that the groundwater contamination had caused health problems.[11] The California Supreme Court, in a landmark ruling in 2003, however, found that the citizens of Redlands, had no basis for filing a class action toxic tort lawsuit against the Lockheed Martin Corporation. The ruling in Carrillo v. Lockheed Martin both clarified the terms upon which mass medical tort claims may be filed, and debunked the increasingly common notion that "medical monitoring" is always a reasonable response when people are exposed to hazardous chemicals.[12]

Nonetheless, the Lockheed-Martin Corporation, successor to Lockheed Aircraft Corporation, has resisted efforts to make it pay for the clean-up of the contamination. Federal policies allowed for burning toxic chemical waste in open, unlined dirt pits during the 1970s, according to a lawsuit that Lockheed Martin Corp. filed against the U.S. government. Lockheed reported more than $500 million in liabilities companywide from "environmental matters," which include soil and groundwater contamination in Redlands and unrelated projects, according to SEC filings. In a suit filed on 1 July 2008, the company wants the government to pay past cleanup costs and to be held liable for future expenses. A Lockheed spokeswoman declined to comment on the company's lawsuit, filed Tuesday in federal court in the District of Columbia. The lawsuit doesn't say how much money the company is seeking.[13]

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 "ATSDR-PHA-HC-Lockheed Propulsion Company-p1". Atsdr.cdc.gov. 1997-05-28. Retrieved 2016-02-24.
  2. ↑ https://web.archive.org/20090607112632/http://www.godickson.com:80/ahsfvstory.htm. Archived from the original on June 7, 2009. Retrieved November 17, 2010. Missing or empty |title= (help)
  3. ↑ https://web.archive.org/20121105034640/http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-67787514.html. Archived from the original on November 5, 2012. Retrieved November 17, 2010. Missing or empty |title= (help)
  4. ↑ "Viking, Redstone, and Vanguard". Ericweisstein.com. Retrieved 2016-02-24.
  5. ↑ "Project Mercury - A Chronology. Appendix 9". History.nasa.gov. 1960-12-14. Retrieved 2016-02-24.
  6. 1 2 (PDF) https://web.archive.org/20110715130953/http://www.pubklaw.com/rd/boards/asbca54853.pdf. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 15, 2011. Retrieved November 18, 2010. Missing or empty |title= (help)
  7. ↑ "Launch Escape". Apollosaturn.com. Retrieved 2016-02-24.
  8. ↑ "楽天が運営するポータルサイト ： 【インフォシーク】Infoseek". Apollomaniacs.web.infoseek.co.jp. Retrieved 2016-02-24.
  9. 1 2 "table1.39". History.nasa.gov. Retrieved 2016-02-24.
  10. ↑ "Perchlorate". Dtsc.ca.gov. Retrieved 2016-02-24.
  11. ↑
  12. ↑ https://web.archive.org/20070804012651/http://www.atlanticlegal.org/case.php?cid=1017. Archived from the original on August 4, 2007. Retrieved November 17, 2010. Missing or empty |title= (help)
  13. ↑ "Lockheed: U.S. must pay for rocket-test cleanup". The Washington Times. Retrieved 2016-02-24.
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Thursday, February 25, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.